babies and teens are all capable to consent, the only thing that needs to change according to age is the action

A place to debate contact stances and possible reforms. You can express pro-c, pro-reform, or anti-c views. Just be respectful and do not advocate engaging in criminalized sexual relationships.
Nopi Balki
Posts: 58
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2025 12:03 am

Re: babies and teens are all capable to consent, the only thing that needs to change according to age is the action

Post by Nopi Balki »

Theendoftheline wrote: Mon Jul 13, 2026 2:36 am
Nopi Balki wrote: Sun Jul 12, 2026 11:16 pm
Theendoftheline wrote: Sun Jul 12, 2026 8:35 am Okay....so some of you MAPS come up with the MOST wild shit ever...no baby can consent IDFC what anyone says.....

I mean their are arguments that "why should sexual play be any different than any other sort of touch except one has to do with genitals and the other doesn't so why do we stigmatize any genital contact in the name of learned trauma" And I do admit I have some of that learned disgust as well but....
What are you so mad for man?
I never said I was mad, just stating how I feel on the matter.
But i mean what do you see wrong of an adult being attracted to a baby?
Theendoftheline
Posts: 171
Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2026 8:38 pm

Re: babies and teens are all capable to consent, the only thing that needs to change according to age is the action

Post by Theendoftheline »

Nopi Balki wrote: Tue Jul 14, 2026 9:52 pm
Theendoftheline wrote: Mon Jul 13, 2026 2:36 am
Nopi Balki wrote: Sun Jul 12, 2026 11:16 pm

What are you so mad for man?
I never said I was mad, just stating how I feel on the matter.
But i mean what do you see wrong of an adult being attracted to a baby?
Idk I'm just biased...babies are the most disgusting things to me personally anyway, just blubbering masses of fat and drool that shit and piss themselves all day....I do not find that personally attractive at all.
Post Reply