https://x.com/CourageHabit/status/1821653263378477074You can’t make up the acronym. They’re telling you exactly who they are.
Pedophiles are trying to rebrand their evil to “Minor Attracted Persons”. We prefer “Mutilating A Pedophile” but that’s just us.
Registered US nonprofit: We prefer “Mutilating A Pedophile”
- Jim Burton
- Posts: 758
- Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2024 10:33 pm
Registered US nonprofit: We prefer “Mutilating A Pedophile”
What restrictions are there on the behavior of nonprofits in the US? I seem to recall the regulations are very thin, such that this behavior would be permitted:
Committee Member: Mu. Editorial Lead: Yesmap
- PorcelainLark
- Posts: 578
- Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2024 9:13 pm
Re: Registered US nonprofit: We prefer “Mutilating A Pedophile”
Unfortunately, I don't think it's violating any laws.




AKA WandersGlade.
-
- Posts: 52
- Joined: Wed Jul 24, 2024 12:54 am
Re: Registered US nonprofit: We prefer “Mutilating A Pedophile”
Its a right wing group so I'm not surprised at the shit they are pushing. The irony about a lot these "groups" is they so against us MAP yet its people in these groups always seem to end getting arrested for SA'ing children or having PIM.
AoA
Males : 10-13
Girls : 10 or 11 -17
Males : 10-13
Girls : 10 or 11 -17
- Jim Burton
- Posts: 758
- Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2024 10:33 pm
Re: Registered US nonprofit: We prefer “Mutilating A Pedophile”
I'm thinking more about regulations determining what kind of political behavior is unbecoming of a charity. I understand the US has very relaxed laws around this.
Committee Member: Mu. Editorial Lead: Yesmap
- PorcelainLark
- Posts: 578
- Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2024 9:13 pm
Re: Registered US nonprofit: We prefer “Mutilating A Pedophile”
Apparently it's Internal Revenue Code Section 501(c)(3).Fragment wrote: Sat Aug 10, 2024 10:46 am According to a chatbot. Unfortunately it doesn’t specify the laws in question. I’m not sure if the IRS would be the actual place to contact. But it’s a place to start.

You don't have to prove that it's hateful for it to be violating that section.

Apparently that statement could be violating the section.

However, I think, based on following, they could defend themselves on the basis either that statement lacks direct incitement and/or dispute that the statement is literal.

Even if this example wouldn't quite fit, it's a good exercise, because now we will know what to look for. It's best to wait for a really strong example. If you tried this and it failed, organizations like that might start to become more careful and so we might end up missing an opportunity to set a legal precedent.
As Sun Tzu said: "Never interrupt an opponent while he is the middle of making a mistake".
AKA WandersGlade.
- BLueRibbon
- Posts: 857
- Joined: Sat Jun 29, 2024 12:03 pm
Re: Registered US nonprofit: We prefer “Mutilating A Pedophile”
So are anonymous complaints possible, or is anyone willing to make a complaint using their real name?
Brian Ribbon, Mu Co-Founder and Strategist
A Call for the Abolition of Apathy
The Push
Pro-Reform
16/12
A Call for the Abolition of Apathy
The Push
Pro-Reform
16/12
-
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2024 1:48 am
Re: Registered US nonprofit: We prefer “Mutilating A Pedophile”
I'm in favour of complaining.
I often report people who break rules by threatening to dox or hurt maps online and they're almost always punished. At the very least, rules and laws like that apply fairly. I think we ought to report to everywhere we can, including X itself or if they have a website we can report to their providers.
I often report people who break rules by threatening to dox or hurt maps online and they're almost always punished. At the very least, rules and laws like that apply fairly. I think we ought to report to everywhere we can, including X itself or if they have a website we can report to their providers.