Registered US nonprofit: We prefer “Mutilating A Pedophile”

A place to draw attention to social media discussions about MAPs.
Post Reply
User avatar
Jim Burton
Posts: 758
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2024 10:33 pm

Registered US nonprofit: We prefer “Mutilating A Pedophile”

Post by Jim Burton »

What restrictions are there on the behavior of nonprofits in the US? I seem to recall the regulations are very thin, such that this behavior would be permitted:
You can’t make up the acronym. They’re telling you exactly who they are.

Pedophiles are trying to rebrand their evil to “Minor Attracted Persons”. We prefer “Mutilating A Pedophile” but that’s just us.
https://x.com/CourageHabit/status/1821653263378477074
Committee Member: Mu. Editorial Lead: Yesmap
User avatar
PorcelainLark
Posts: 578
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2024 9:13 pm

Re: Registered US nonprofit: We prefer “Mutilating A Pedophile”

Post by PorcelainLark »

Unfortunately, I don't think it's violating any laws.
Image
Image
AKA WandersGlade.
ZeroXJoker
Posts: 52
Joined: Wed Jul 24, 2024 12:54 am

Re: Registered US nonprofit: We prefer “Mutilating A Pedophile”

Post by ZeroXJoker »

Its a right wing group so I'm not surprised at the shit they are pushing. The irony about a lot these "groups" is they so against us MAP yet its people in these groups always seem to end getting arrested for SA'ing children or having PIM.
AoA
Males : 10-13
Girls : 10 or 11 -17
User avatar
Jim Burton
Posts: 758
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2024 10:33 pm

Re: Registered US nonprofit: We prefer “Mutilating A Pedophile”

Post by Jim Burton »

I'm thinking more about regulations determining what kind of political behavior is unbecoming of a charity. I understand the US has very relaxed laws around this.
Committee Member: Mu. Editorial Lead: Yesmap
User avatar
PorcelainLark
Posts: 578
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2024 9:13 pm

Re: Registered US nonprofit: We prefer “Mutilating A Pedophile”

Post by PorcelainLark »

Fragment wrote: Sat Aug 10, 2024 10:46 am According to a chatbot. Unfortunately it doesn’t specify the laws in question. I’m not sure if the IRS would be the actual place to contact. But it’s a place to start.
Apparently it's Internal Revenue Code Section 501(c)(3).
Image

You don't have to prove that it's hateful for it to be violating that section.
Image

Apparently that statement could be violating the section.
Image

However, I think, based on following, they could defend themselves on the basis either that statement lacks direct incitement and/or dispute that the statement is literal.
Image

Even if this example wouldn't quite fit, it's a good exercise, because now we will know what to look for. It's best to wait for a really strong example. If you tried this and it failed, organizations like that might start to become more careful and so we might end up missing an opportunity to set a legal precedent.
As Sun Tzu said: "Never interrupt an opponent while he is the middle of making a mistake".
AKA WandersGlade.
User avatar
BLueRibbon
Posts: 857
Joined: Sat Jun 29, 2024 12:03 pm

Re: Registered US nonprofit: We prefer “Mutilating A Pedophile”

Post by BLueRibbon »

So are anonymous complaints possible, or is anyone willing to make a complaint using their real name?
Brian Ribbon, Mu Co-Founder and Strategist

A Call for the Abolition of Apathy
The Push
Pro-Reform
16/12
NekoLovesFemaleMaps
Posts: 19
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2024 1:48 am

Re: Registered US nonprofit: We prefer “Mutilating A Pedophile”

Post by NekoLovesFemaleMaps »

I'm in favour of complaining.

I often report people who break rules by threatening to dox or hurt maps online and they're almost always punished. At the very least, rules and laws like that apply fairly. I think we ought to report to everywhere we can, including X itself or if they have a website we can report to their providers.
Post Reply