I could just call it a pedophile manifesto, but...Jim Burton wrote: Wed Oct 01, 2025 3:31 pm I don't have any concerns with it, whatever form it takes, being an archived document on NewgonWiki, I'm just saying any pro-c manifesto that uses the terminology "MAP" is likely to become associated with the wider community almost automatically if it gains the necessary publicity to have any traction. This would certainly lead to a large part of the community taking a dim view of the person who wrote it and claiming they should have known what they were inviting unto themselves and others.
This is why I say look at it more as a way of representing pro-c MAPs in a favourable way (e.g. self-aware, concerned about being perceived as greedy or self-interested, aware of those risks), even if it is written as a manifesto. It's almost like we now have to sell the pro-c/anti-c divide to the public, so they actually get interested in our topic, and feel like they should be taking sides in some way.
1. That wouldn't technically be accurate as I'm pedohebephilic.
2. I don't want to focus on advocating decriminalization of sex with preteens, even in a radical manifesto.