Do female maps just have a regular relationship to not get caught
-
LookingForMilfs
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2025 4:22 am
Do female maps just have a regular relationship to not get caught
I’ve always seen female school teachers who are rapists but they always get arrested. So just do the occasional female maps get a regular relationship and feel like in a prison they’ll never get the true relationship they wanted?
18 male
Just looking for some older women who may like a younger person in their life
Just looking for some older women who may like a younger person in their life
Re: Do female maps just have a regular relationship to not get caught
I remember a well-known case that was in the news many years ago about a female teacher who was convicted for sleeping with her 12-year-old student (from what I've quickly googled, her name was Mary Kay Letourneau. Details might be off/omitted). When she got out of prison the second time (apparently she was sent back because they broke a no-contact order), they eventually got married and were together for 14 years. If I'm not mistaken, they had two daughters together while he was still a minor.
Re: Do female maps just have a regular relationship to not get caught
There is a strange belief for many people that pedophilia is a male "condition" but that's wrong on many levels.
There's a researcher I follow from time to time who published insightful articles, most of which are over my head but there are a few points of interest I've taken away.
1. No one knows how many females are maps because females are expected in their gender role to be close and caring for kids, so a female expressing closeness and interest in a child is just following her female instincts while a male doing the same is demonstrating predatory patterns. It could be that more women are pedophiles than men. We don't know for the reasons below.
2. She openly admits that part of the problem is that research is restricted to certain areas. A researcher has limited ways that they can collect data, so datasets are usually narrow and misleading. This is known but it's the only data that can be collected under curretn ethical frameworks. For example, data from offenders. If you were to base parental research on data collected from parents charged with neglect and extrapolate that to all parents then no one would be allowed to be parents.
3. She openly points out that research is very narrowly constrained and based on assumptions that can't be challenged. For example, sexual relationships with children is abusive, that's a fact that can't be challenged or researched. No university would allow such research and it would be career ending for the researcher. So starting from assumptions such as this, research can only be about how to reduce abusive behaviour, so it's assumed that pedophiles are an abuse risk by their nature. There has been a lot of neural research to identify how to detect and correct this mental illness, but so far there's been no evidence that there's any mental markers that differentiate it to other sexualities. So it's a sexuality that triggers the same patterns as other sexualities and can't be detected as something else. So the search continues because it's unacceptable to conclude that it is in fact a normal sexuality like others. Start with a set of assumptions that can't be challenged, set a narrow set of conclusions and only permit research that sits within those narrow bands.
There's a researcher I follow from time to time who published insightful articles, most of which are over my head but there are a few points of interest I've taken away.
1. No one knows how many females are maps because females are expected in their gender role to be close and caring for kids, so a female expressing closeness and interest in a child is just following her female instincts while a male doing the same is demonstrating predatory patterns. It could be that more women are pedophiles than men. We don't know for the reasons below.
2. She openly admits that part of the problem is that research is restricted to certain areas. A researcher has limited ways that they can collect data, so datasets are usually narrow and misleading. This is known but it's the only data that can be collected under curretn ethical frameworks. For example, data from offenders. If you were to base parental research on data collected from parents charged with neglect and extrapolate that to all parents then no one would be allowed to be parents.
3. She openly points out that research is very narrowly constrained and based on assumptions that can't be challenged. For example, sexual relationships with children is abusive, that's a fact that can't be challenged or researched. No university would allow such research and it would be career ending for the researcher. So starting from assumptions such as this, research can only be about how to reduce abusive behaviour, so it's assumed that pedophiles are an abuse risk by their nature. There has been a lot of neural research to identify how to detect and correct this mental illness, but so far there's been no evidence that there's any mental markers that differentiate it to other sexualities. So it's a sexuality that triggers the same patterns as other sexualities and can't be detected as something else. So the search continues because it's unacceptable to conclude that it is in fact a normal sexuality like others. Start with a set of assumptions that can't be challenged, set a narrow set of conclusions and only permit research that sits within those narrow bands.