was wondering your guys opinion on people who are atracted to animals

A place for the discussion of all kinds of paraphilia, gender and sexual identities. Please be tolerant and supportive.
Post Reply
freezerpop
Posts: 17
Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2026 2:25 am

was wondering your guys opinion on people who are atracted to animals

Post by freezerpop »

i don't really have one myself but would love to hear your thoughts!
notlexie
Posts: 9
Joined: Sat Jul 11, 2026 7:37 pm

Re: was wondering your guys opinion on people who are atracted to animals

Post by notlexie »

I heard that dogs are really good lickers and that got me curious tbh
AAM/MAP girl - CSA survivor
Into men, especially hairy ones
Into boys younger then me and into girls 4 n up
User avatar
Condemned
Posts: 81
Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2025 5:06 am

Re: was wondering your guys opinion on people who are atracted to animals

Post by Condemned »

To each their own. I am not judging them one way or another. As long as there is no harm to the animal, go for it.
Heterosexual male | 40s | Married with kids | CSA survivor | AoA all genders 0 - 8 (primarily 0 - 3)
DANAT4T
Posts: 450
Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2025 4:02 pm

Re: was wondering your guys opinion on people who are atracted to animals

Post by DANAT4T »

Condemned wrote: Wed Jul 15, 2026 12:13 am To each their own. I am not judging them one way or another. As long as there is no harm to the animal, go for it.
I don't know what you are trying to say. Nobody mentioned harming animals. What's your point?
I support AAMs and MAPs. Personally I am a romantic GL but I support loving relationships between people from infants all the way up to the elderly.💘
User avatar
Jim Burton
Posts: 2797
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2024 10:33 pm

Re: was wondering your guys opinion on people who are atracted to animals

Post by Jim Burton »

There are a well-publicized and heavily prosecuted group called Zoosadists who derive pleasure (some, with sexual arousal) from harming animals.

The vast majority of online, self-identified Zoosadists are anti-contact. The anti-contact group are often insistent that Zoosadism is a Zoophile identity and should be part of Zoophile communities, in much the same way Objectophiles lobbied to be recognized as a sexuality.

The Zoosadist fandom became well-known in MAP spaces, after a Zoosadist activist founded and ran a well-known MAP/Paraphile space for around 4 or 5 years until recently. It divides opinion, I guess.
Committee Member: Mu. Editorial Lead: Yesmap

Adult-attracted gay man; writer. Attraction to minors is typical variation of human sexuality.
User avatar
Jim Burton
Posts: 2797
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2024 10:33 pm

Re: was wondering your guys opinion on people who are atracted to animals

Post by Jim Burton »

We did recently have a thread on Zoophilia that ran to 7 pages...

https://forum.map-union.org/viewtopic.php?t=3142
Committee Member: Mu. Editorial Lead: Yesmap

Adult-attracted gay man; writer. Attraction to minors is typical variation of human sexuality.
TheHamilplexOfficial
Posts: 74
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2026 2:17 am

Re: was wondering your guys opinion on people who are atracted to animals

Post by TheHamilplexOfficial »

i love my fellow zoos >w<!!!!!!!
"History Has Its Eyes On You"
AAM, zoo, objectphile/objectum, and fictophile
yawn eepy
#1 Hamilton Fan
Gordo-Nacho and Taffy Man
Zmap
Posts: 13
Joined: Wed May 20, 2026 12:57 am

Re: was wondering your guys opinion on people who are atracted to animals

Post by Zmap »

I'm not directly attracted to animals themselves but i am greatly attracted to animals doing things with other people. Dogs licking for example. Why? idk. Just am? it's all about the pleasure
39M. AOA: male 0-9, female 4-16. Through history minors have been sexual and who are we to deny them that.
Kierkegaard
Posts: 55
Joined: Fri Nov 21, 2025 4:15 am

Re: was wondering your guys opinion on people who are atracted to animals

Post by Kierkegaard »

I wouldn't call myself a zoophile in the same way I am a pedophile, but I do have something of a fetish for some kinds of bestiality, and I don't have any ethical hangups over sex with animals as long as the animal isn't being harmed. Which, in the case of most animals, is really as simple as looking at their body language and having basic common sense. It's not that hard to tell when an animal is in pain or stressed out. The whole "animals can't consent" line that people will throw out is even more ridiculous than when it's used for children, because depending on what consent is supposed to mean in this context it's either patently false or patently absurd. If consent just means simple willingness or assent then it's clearly not true. Dogs are very much willing to get erect and stick their penises into various things, including humans if given the chance. If it means informed consent in the sense we talk about adult humans giving informed consent then it's absurd, because dogs clearly cannot give informed consent to anything at all, being non-human animals who lack the capacity for abstract thought. That's not a serious ethical requirement for doing something with an animal. The only ethical consideration most people care about is if an animal is being needlessly harmed. And a dog fucking a human is not harmful to the dog if they're not being coerced into doing it.

Most people's stances on animal ethics are highly contradictory in general, not just when it comes to having sex with them. I'm not a vegan, but I think vegans are correct to say that non-vegans who oppose "animal abuse" while eating factory farmed meat are just blatant hypocrites who base their morality on arbitrary, irrational standards and don't take animal welfare seriously. I respect vegans who are serious about it, and I respect people who admit they don't really give a shit about animals one way or the other, but people who get all up in arms about how abusing dogs is evil while munching down on an omelet made with bacon and eggs from farm animals that were essentially tortured their whole lives in inhumane, miserable conditions so we can have cheap animal protein are annoying. Make up your mind, either you think animals are ethical subjects or you don't, but don't be all sanctimonious about it when your views aren't even internally consistent.

Anyway, I'm not really attracted to animals like I'm attracted to kids. It's more of a kink or fetish than an orientation. I think that certain animals with big cocks like dogs, wolves, horses, etc are hot, or more accurately, that seeing them ejaculate and mount people is hot. I have zero interest whatsoever in sticking my own penis inside an animal, but the idea of getting fucked by an animal penis or seeing that happen to someone else is kind of arousing.
Post Reply