(Saying this for legal purposes, not condoning doing anything illegal. I'm talking about a world where there is no arbitrary AOC)
Surely I can't be the only one frustrated by all the 'contact is fine, penetration is not' for under 5s. A lot of people seem to forget that you can start with fingers and lots of lubricant ect.
That being said I realise I might be an anomaly here. What do you personally think?
babies and teens are all capable to consent, the only thing that needs to change according to age is the action
-
johnnydoe12345
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2026 5:08 am
-
weird.organisms
- Posts: 386
- Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2026 2:54 am
Re: babies and teens are all capable to consent, the only thing that needs to change according to age is the action
I'd say that if such a world existed it would be a matter of individual concern and should be left up to the youth to decide after watching penetrative acts. I don't think when it comes to this that there's a universal age.
External contact is one thing. Internal could be uncomfortable for some at different ages.
External contact is one thing. Internal could be uncomfortable for some at different ages.
Writer, mediocre artist, and total sub!
Westernized society hates youth. MAPs are the cure. Youth are NOT slaves. They are our future and we must fight for their freedom.
Westernized society hates youth. MAPs are the cure. Youth are NOT slaves. They are our future and we must fight for their freedom.
