I’m a Sex worker with teenage clients

[lovefindsaway]

In the country I live in, the age of consent is 14. It is perfectly legal for teenagers 14 and above to have sex with people of their choosing. Teenagers can also buy sex. Recently, I was contacted by a 16 year old client who found me on an escort site and he wanted to do a video call. I’m twice his age.
Some sex workers choose not to work with teenagers altogether, but as long as they have money and are willing to pay for my services, I say why not!?

If it was legal, how would you feel about an excited 5 to 10 year old brought by a parent who also agrees as a client?

This goes to prove that if all parties do consent then sex work with clients regardless of age is, in a sense, sex education and satisfaction for both at the end of the day ( of course, that alone isnt sex education but paired with schooling, its not a bad idea especially to prepare the youth before they hit.puberty. sexual attraction starts before the teens). And the workers make good money from it.

This is not a foreign concept at all. In the ethnography, “ sexual behavior in pre-contact Hawaii” https://www.hawaii.edu/PCSS/biblio/arti ... awaii.html
It talks about how indigenous Hawaiians started educating children as young as six years old on sex.

“ Until the age of 4-6, young males and females played together. Between 4 and 6, young males went to live in the hale nua, where, through observation, they learned sex roles and sex-related expectations from adult males. Unlike traditions that were present in some other parts of Oceania (see Schiefenhovel, 1990), there is no evidence that ritualized adult-male/adolescent-male sexual activities were practiced in traditional Hawai‘i.

Similarly, young females learned from the older women, with whom they remained. They were taught to look forward to sex and appreciate its pleasures. Both sexes heard the sex-positive conversations, songs, and stories of their elders and learned accordingly. By the age of puberty sexual exploration with same-sex age mates was actively encouraged.”

So to answer your question: Yes, I would accept a 5-10 year old client to talk about, explain, and explore pleasure for themselves.

[amorfati]

Seems apropos to bring up Luhmann and communication regimes that symbolic generalized media capture as discrete and codified. The friction generated when attempting to translate across boundaries is unavoidable. Intimacy and Economics, or specifically - love/not love and payment/nonpayment. No amount of love can be settled, cleanly in monetary terms nor can any amount of money be cleanly settled as love. These are distinctly different communication regimes whose friction is a feature and not a bug: if love and money are genuinely separate codes, neither substitutable for the other, then any transaction straddling both requires active work to keep it legible as belonging to one, the other, or a deliberately ambiguous third thing. The objections or support discussed here is doing this work essentially. To make the claim that there is a purer form of 'sex work without money,' is to attempt to borrow intimacy's code and attempt a reverse translation, which in an economic regime becomes irrelevant: transactional 'purity' might only be expressed as the ease with which payment occurs, not some magical transmutation that converts volume into more good-ness.