babies and teens are all capable to consent, the only thing that needs to change according to age is the action

A place to debate contact stances and possible reforms. You can express pro-c, pro-reform, or anti-c views. Just be respectful and do not advocate engaging in criminalized sexual relationships.
johnnydoe12345
Posts: 12
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2026 5:08 am

What age do you think penetration should be permitted?

Post by johnnydoe12345 »

(Saying this for legal purposes, not condoning doing anything illegal. I'm talking about a world where there is no arbitrary AOC)

Surely I can't be the only one frustrated by all the 'contact is fine, penetration is not' for under 5s. A lot of people seem to forget that you can start with fingers and lots of lubricant ect.

That being said I realise I might be an anomaly here. What do you personally think?
weird.organisms
Posts: 476
Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2026 2:54 am

Re: babies and teens are all capable to consent, the only thing that needs to change according to age is the action

Post by weird.organisms »

I'd say that if such a world existed it would be a matter of individual concern and should be left up to the youth to decide after watching penetrative acts. I don't think when it comes to this that there's a universal age.

External contact is one thing. Internal could be uncomfortable for some at different ages.
Writer, mediocre artist, and total sub!
Westernized society hates youth. MAPs are the cure. Youth are NOT slaves. They are our future and we must fight for their freedom.
ScuretCutie d(^v^)b
Posts: 51
Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2026 11:42 am

Re: babies and teens are all capable to consent, the only thing that needs to change according to age is the action

Post by ScuretCutie d(^v^)b »

Makes sense, but I'm fairly certain there's more to it. I like the thought process though, it's good to consider whether their body can handle it.
Just a chill AAM, 15. Single pringle, too afraid to mingle. Pro-contact and wishing us all a bright future. Project CHRYSALIS might just be what we need... Also, my name's Eve!
Nopi Balki
Posts: 66
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2025 12:03 am

Re: babies and teens are all capable to consent, the only thing that needs to change according to age is the action

Post by Nopi Balki »

Theendoftheline wrote: Mon Jul 20, 2026 12:05 am
Nopi Balki wrote: Sun Jul 19, 2026 7:53 pm
Theendoftheline wrote: Wed Jul 15, 2026 12:59 am

Idk I'm just biased...babies are the most disgusting things to me personally anyway, just blubbering masses of fat and drool that shit and piss themselves all day....I do not find that personally attractive at all.
I respect is not ur attraction, but about this "just blubbering masses of fat and drool that shit and piss themselves all day....", there is much more than that, when they pick up an object or toy and look at it with curiosity, when they see something simple and they giggle so happy for it , at that age they are very affectionate and they wanting to be close to someone and hug them, i see that and am in love man, sure parents experience that same emotions as me just that for me is that plus the sexual attraction, so that attraction though rare is not something too out of this world

Have you been a parent yet or never gonna try?
i dunno man i just cannot get behind that. I think you are confusing fraternal feelings with sexual desire somehow.
I feel both, is a beautiful thing.. is confusing sometimes though but if it was just fraternal i would not desire to lip kiss a 1 yo
Post Reply