Majorly Attractive Pedophile incoming

[TayFerret]

Hello. I just randomly found this place from a link on BoyChat. I'm a furry pedo known for making furry drawings and a few video games too.

I'm firmly pro-contact. I usually say my AoA is around 6-12, but it extends beyond that too (both younger and older). I like boys and girls.

I started recognizing my attraction to kids sometime when I was a teen (maybe even when I was as young as 12), and at the age of 20 I fully accepted my sexuality and became pro-contact. (I don't think anyone who is anti-contact has really fully accepted their attraction yet).

I'm pretty based ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ItHj2g9jWu0 ), so I hope the administration here isn't too woke. If I'm gonna get in trouble for not using someone's they/them pronouns or for being critical of Black Lives Matter then you might as well just ban me now. But I'm not one of those old, bitter, racist types from BoyChat either!

[BLueRibbon]

Welcome.

We're not 'woke'. Just don't be a dick.

[NotTrueToMyself]

Welcome!

I must say I have a lot of admiration for the bravery it takes to live in the open.

We all need to be kinder to each other. If our own community cannot treat ourselves with respect, how do we expect normies to do it?

[Jim Burton]

The MAP Forum is intended to be a blank canvas, where any MAP or ally can feel comfortable participating, as long as they are open to alternative points of view.

Our rules prohibit extremism, and have nothing to do with progressivism or particular identity groups, other than MAP safety.

Racist content is one type of content that would be banned, on the basis that it is uniquely disruptive, not more or less bigoted than, say anti-gay content. Flippantly provocative content, such as casual use of anti-gay slurs would likely come under rule 6, as well. Anything that is unnecessary, and gives ammunition to our opponents.

Zogposting and references to other contentious political theories would be discouraged outside of the politics forum because they are likely to provoke users to reply off-topic. Forum admins and moderators would decide among themselves if certain theories might be discussed in dedicated threads, or permitted in a formal debate where each point could be addressed methodically. I'd support the idea of having a formal, 2-way debate with a pro-rape incel, or a racist MAP, if I had an intelligent person to argue methodically against it.

[Lennon72]

Hey, dude, What up? I am not into the whole "woke" thing either. But neither am I a right wing extremist. But regarding the pro-nouns, I personally think that it is important to call people what they wish to be called. It is natural to get it wrong sometimes but, no, you shouldn't get yelled at if you mess up. Corrected? Yes. Yelled at? No. Glad to have you here as we all go through life as MAPS.