Strawberries equal kinder porn

[KnightofHope]

I have no words really

https://www.boredpanda.com/zara-forced- ... complains/

The results of the vote at the bottom are at least somewhat encouraging.

[TheOtherKindofPride]

It just goes to show how desperate so many people in society are to hate us as much as possible. They're jumping at shadows and shadowboxing normal stuff mistaking it for the work of the Boogeyman. This kind of paranoia is a disease in society, and the cure is to stop being so insanely hateful towards those who just want to have mutually beneficial contact with minors. Don't hate all drugs to the point of having an aneurysm, just hate the ones that cant be ingested at all without destroying society. The puritanical Gestapo is getting way too trigger happy.

And while the results of the poll are an atom-thin silver lining, we should all stay aware that the instant these same people end up with normal non-lewd anime lolis in front of them, they'll completely lose their minds. You can never be safe among anyone who is not also a MAP, and even then...

[Bookshelf]

There's a comment on there that sums up my thoughts pretty well: "Pedos aren't going to be the slightest bit bothered what is written on a t-shirt. I guarantee that this mother hears about women suffering from sexual assault and the first thing her mind goes to is "What were they wearing?".

It's such a weird battle to choose to have. People who are going to do anything to kids aren't going to be encouraged or discouraged by what's written on their shirts. The article says the mother feels she's doing this to 'protect' her kids, but from what? What's getting prevented by making a big deal out of this shirt here?

[TheOtherKindofPride]

I'm pretty sure there are studies that have shown that what an adult rape victim was wearing is largely irrelevant, especially when compared to other factors like ease of 1-on-1 access to the victim and how easy to manipulate, psychologically or physically, they are. The closest thing to a clothing-related deterrent would be a chastity belt or a pistol on their hip, and I wouldn't be surprised if Americans started putting both on their kids at some point. These people are cartoonishly unhinged.

As a non-exclusive, unless a woman is covered head-to-toe in an obviously unflattering outfit that shows off none of their figure or even something like a Burqa that makes it basically impossible to tell if the person is even a woman or not, much less even attractive, it's not hard to find a naturally attractive women attractive, even if she's wearing a long sleeve shirt and pants. Hell, just leaving it up to my imagination actually makes it more interesting on some ways since I can imagine her being buck naked and 10/10 under the cloak, so kinda counter productive really. The more revealing or titillating clothing is basically just a bonus, unless the girl underneath the clothes is just genuinely unattractive. Admittedly a skirt on a girl is usually more attractive than shorts or pants, depending, but I've never felt the desire to do anything against anyone's consent regardless of what they looked like or what they were wearing. I'm pretty sure actual rapists just think differently from non-rapists, similar to those who are more prone to physical violence than other people. But then I'm getting into the whole "lolicon vs GTA/sexuality vs violence" debate territory, which is mind-numbing for how antis engage in such extreme mental gymnastics to pretend like there's a real meaningful difference when it comes to the likelihood of committing crimes.
I don't think this is one of these situations where if you suddenly put a non-rapist into the situation that triggered a rapist to commit their crime, a non-rapist would do the same thing. No, I'm pretty sure it's a personality problem, or at least that's one aspect of it.