James Cantor & his research on pedophilia

[mrlolicon93]

What do you guys think of Dr. James Cantor and his research on pedophilia/pedophiles?

Me personally i appreciate that he acknowledges the fact that it may very well be an orientation but i feel most of his research is biased given he is studying mostly offenders.

He also, has a tendency to contradict himself a lot such as acknowledging minor attraction as an orientation while also, hoping for a cure and most of the conclusions he comes to such as pedophiles being short left handed with low iq brain damage/head injury and poor impulse control can easily be debunked.

[Fragment]

He has a long career researching minor attraction. I think you'll find his views have changed over time.

He has done more good than bad, even if some of his conclusions have seemed weird to me.

[Jim Burton]

He has become Rind-like, but not as helpful. I think it's the complete lack of supportive grifts for us at this point. As soon as opportunities present themselves, people will come on-board. Hopefully things like the Melzer trust start to encourage writers and researchers in a certain direction. Properly managed, that estate can easily tip the direction of a University research program.

[BLueRibbon]

James Cantor seems to be a legitimate academic whose views are shaped by the findings of his studies. He likely adopted a more reasonable perspective toward MAPs as a result of his research.