What do you guys think of Dr. James Cantor and his research on pedophilia/pedophiles?
Me personally i appreciate that he acknowledges the fact that it may very well be an orientation but i feel most of his research is biased given he is studying mostly offenders.
He also, has a tendency to contradict himself a lot such as acknowledging minor attraction as an orientation while also, hoping for a cure and most of the conclusions he comes to such as pedophiles being short left handed with low iq brain damage/head injury and poor impulse control can easily be debunked.
James Cantor & his research on pedophilia
- mrlolicon93
- Posts: 205
- Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2024 8:20 am
James Cantor & his research on pedophilia
Male
Non-exclusive
Girl-Lover
AOA 3 and up prefers ages 5-14
Non-exclusive
Girl-Lover
AOA 3 and up prefers ages 5-14
- Jim Burton
- Posts: 775
- Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2024 10:33 pm
Re: James Cantor & his research on pedophilia
He has become Rind-like, but not as helpful. I think it's the complete lack of supportive grifts for us at this point. As soon as opportunities present themselves, people will come on-board. Hopefully things like the Melzer trust start to encourage writers and researchers in a certain direction. Properly managed, that estate can easily tip the direction of a University research program.
Committee Member: Mu. Editorial Lead: Yesmap
- BLueRibbon
- Posts: 870
- Joined: Sat Jun 29, 2024 12:03 pm
Re: James Cantor & his research on pedophilia
James Cantor seems to be a legitimate academic whose views are shaped by the findings of his studies. He likely adopted a more reasonable perspective toward MAPs as a result of his research.
www.brianribbon.com