MAP Forum

Is 'glorifying/normalizing pedophilia' legal? And is it wise strategically when talking with normies and trying to get them to view us better? I would assume the answer to the first is yes usually and the answer to the second is probably no usually. When among likeminded people I sometimes like doing that kinda stuff for fun and for community affirmation (in legal ways).

It's not illegal.

In real life, I would try expressing sympathy for MAPs, at least those who 'don't offend', without stating you are a MAP yourself. With very close friends and family, coming out can go either way. Mu's recent survey revealed that outcomes were usually positive or neutral, but not always.

It's not illegal to be a pedophile, say your a pedophile, or even have an underage boy/girlfriend. But as soon as you have sex with them, you're the worst of criminals.

But even if you don't cross that line, people will always see you as a potential felon. Therefore it is perfectly legal, and even seen as respectable, to fire you from jobs, deny you any new ones, and also deny you any loans, housing, or insurance. You also won't be able to join the military.

Incidentally, I was pretty much able to copy and paste that from a summary of what happened to the gays.

It's not illegal but it will get you banned from most sites. It's heavily suppressed through the decisions of private companies making it seem de facto illegal. I wouldn't be surprised if they make it illegal soon, there would be widespread popular support if a law came up suppressing it. For comparison, I think I recall reading that Paypal won't allow financial transactions relating to lolicon/shotacon.

That's why it's important to push back against demagoguery and populism; the more the liberal establishment loses ground, the more populism will give license to authoritarians. Anarchists are naive to think letting the system burn will make things better.

I have written a paper on the subject of pedophilia and incest based on my study on human history. I have already given it in a like in my early introduction which is <https://anticorruptionfight.blogspot.com/>

The Basic premises of its starting page is in the following
Theoretical Rough Draft Part - I

BASIC PRIMISES

PAEDOPHILIA AND INCEST(INBREEDING) ARE MADE INTO THE TWO MOST HATED SEXUAL TABOO BEHAVIOURS IN THE “MODERN” AGE HUMAN SOCIETY. HOWEVER, I DO BELIEVE THE FEAR AND HATRED AGAINST PEDOPHILIA AND INCEST ARE REAL, STEMS FROM GENUINE CONCERN OF THE PEOPLE.

HOWEVER, PEDOPHILIA AND INBREEDING WERE BASICALLY THE TWO MOST IMPORTANT COMPONENTS THAT WERE ESSENTIAL FOR THE GROWTH AND SURVIVAL OF HUMAN RACE THROUGH OUT THEIR HISTORY. I OPENLY CHALLENGE ANYONE WHO REPUDIATE THE ABOVE HISTORICAL FACTS BASICALLY ON THE SCIENTIFIC GROUNDS, SHOULD COME FORWARD TO PROVE ME WRONG.

I CONSIDER THE TERM “PEDOPHILIA” MEANING “LOVERS OF CHILDREN”, IS A MISNOMER. ALSO THE DEFINITION OF A “CHILD” SAID TO BE INCAPABLE OF GIVING CONSENT ON THEIR SEXUAL MATTERS IS CONTROVERSIAL. I WOULD RATHER PREFER TO CALL IT AS SEXUAL RELATION BETWEEN PERSONS OF YOUNG AND OLD AGE.

ALL HETEROSEXUAL HEALTHY MEN IN GENERAL, MORE OR LESS, NORMALLY ATTRACTED TO THE GIRLS SPECIALLY AROUND THE PUBERTY AGE 10 TO 12 OR MORE. IT IS INBUILD IN THEM BY NATURE. PEOPLE DENYING THIS FACT ARE EITHER BLATANTLY LYING OR SUPRESS THEIR CONSCIOUS MIND TO BECOME PARTIALLY BLIND TO THE REALITY. IT IS COMMONLY CALLED AS "INDOCTRINATION" AND USUALLY HAPPENS IN MANY RELIGIOUS ORDERS WHO TAKE THE OATH OF CELIBACY TO REPRESS THEIR SEXUALITY BUT IT ALWAYS REMAINS IN THEIR SUBCONSCIOUS MIND. YOU CANNOT DENY A SCIENTIFIC TRUTH SIMPLY BECAUSE YOUR MORALITY DON’T AGREE WITH IT.

THE MODERN SOCIAL SCIENCE, BEHAVIOURAL RESEARCH ON CHILD SEX CALLED PEDOPHILIA IS GENERALLY BUILD ON UNSCIENTIFIC FRAUDULENT GROUNDS. THERE ARE NOT ANY SUBSTANTIAL COMPREHENSIVE HISTORICAL RECORDS EVIDENCES THAT SCIENTIFICALLY PROVES THAT THE TRADITIONAL SEX BETWEEN THE YOUNG AND OLD CLEARLY RESULTED IN REAL PHYSICAL HARMS, MENTAL DAMAGE VIOLENCE PAIN, CRUELTY SUFFERING AND DISABILITY THAT HAD DESTROYED THE YOUNGER PERSONS ENTIRE LIFE. THE HISTORICAL EMPIRICAL EVIDENCES SHOWS QUITE THE OPPOSITE. SO THE AUTHORITIES CONVERTED PEDOPHILIA INTO A RELIGION, UNQUESTIONABLE ABSOLUTE TRUTH BUT FULL OF SELF-CONTRADICTIONS.

THE MODERN AGE SEX SCHOLARS ASSERTIONS THAT YOUNG PERSONS BELOW A GIVEN AGE INCAPABLE OF GIVING CONSENSUS ON THEIR SEXUAL MATTER, MOSTLY STANDS ON UNSCIENTIFIC BASIS, LIES, PRECONCEIVED IDEALS OF WOMEN’S VERTUES, PREJUDICED MORALS WHICH HAVE BEEN MADE INTO AN ARTICLE OF FAITH, A BLIND BELIEF BUILT LATTER ON FALSIFIED SCIENTIFIC GROUNDS.


PEOPLE DON’T NEED A ROCKET SCIENCE OR SEVERAL YEARS OF SOCIAL SCIENCE ACADEMIC RESEARCH PHD DEGREE TO FIND OUT THE HISTORICAL FACTS AND EVIDENCES I HAVE PROVIDE IN THIS PAPER. IT ONLY NEEDS AN OPEN MINDED AVERAGE INTELLIGENT RATIONAL PERSON WITH THE COMMON SENSE AND A FAIRLY GOOD KNOWLEDGE OF HUMAN PAST HISTORY, WILL BE ENOUGH TO UNDERSTAND SEE THE REALITY AND THE TRUTHFULNESS GIVEN IN HIS PAPER.

Now can any one please tell me does it come under the criteria of "Glorifying and Normalizing Pedophilia" and get me banned from this site"

Fragment wrote: Mon Jan 13, 2025 3:33 am "Boys are the most beautiful creatures in existence and antis are the ones with the problem because they can't see that."

That's not glorifying paedophilia: it's stating a palpable fact

Seriously, though, I think most people (are conditioned to) conflate tolerance and normalisation. We should call a pedo a pedo (or a nonce, beast, sicko, kiddie-fiddler, two-pin DIN plug...) because calling them "minor attracted" normalises them. (How may times have you heard that?) The moment one relinquishes the notion that we're disgusting perverts who should be fed to the woodchipper then come the accusations of promoting child abuse.

Yet in reality, it's hate-speech that's illegal, not our orientation.

Is 'glorifying/normalizing condoms legal ?
Is 'glorifying/normalizing prostitution legal ?
Is 'glorifying/normalizing pornography legal ?
Is 'glorifying/normalizing interracial marriage legal?
Is 'glorifying/normalizing homosexual relationship legal?
Is 'glorifying/normalizing cannabis legal ?

All these things were really illegal at different times.

It depends on the approach but I think it is legal and moral to do so if that's what you believe.

Once in the work place many years ago I was surprised when a gay man in his 50s started to talk in the office about a news article in the press at the time about a man talking about how he's a pedophile but none-offending, and he was making jokes about how bad it was that he could even say that. He was really coming down on this pedophile just for saying he's a normal guy and not offending.

What surprised me was then another guy, a younger guy in his mid 20's then defended the article and the man, saying how pedophiles can't help being born pedophiles and he it makes sense what he is saying. He hasn't done anything wrong and he's just talking about wanting to live a normal life.

I'm not proud of my own reaction because then they asked me what I thought and I just said "we've got a deadline here, we need to focus on our work and someone's sexuality isn't my business". That closed the conversation off, but I was surprised how the gay man had no sympathy for this pedophile and the young very heterosexual engaged guy had so much sympathy.

I don't think the LGBTQ is an ally that we should rely on to show any compassion or empathy, we should focus on smart rational people. That young guy was a smart young technical person. Did age play a part as in is the younger generation more open minded to new ideas? Was it that he was highly mathematical and scientific that played a part? Was it his own background and upbringing or experiences?