MAP Forum

Little girls all the way, they just keep getting hotter the younger they are!

I like YOUNG BOYS only. My AOA are BOYS between 3-9 years old. But have A real soft spot for Little-boys between 3-6 years old.

LittleGirlLover9 wrote: Thu Feb 13, 2025 12:40 am Little girls all the way, they just keep getting hotter the younger they are!

You said that right

I like both, but honestly I am almost sexually exclusive attracted to little girls. Little girls aged 0-3 years old. They are the hottest age imo. I don't even know how to explain it, they just have every single fucking attribute that I love. Their cute little eyes, their chunky bodies, their cuteness, their fluffy cheeks, their weird soft feminity and ofc sexually they have many attributes that I find sexy: Their proportions and body shape are arousing, their flat chest, their paler skin, their smooth hairless skin and their [please avoid graphic description - Moderation].

I love both, but I had to vote boys. Accepting that I'm a bottom has led me to see boys in an entirely new and exciting way.

I notice there are as many pedophiles in this community as there are hebephiles.

This demonstrates that many hebephiles don't feel the need to take part in sexually deviant communities.

Jim Burton wrote: Tue Mar 25, 2025 3:32 am I notice there are as many pedophiles in this community as there are hebephiles.

This demonstrates that many hebephiles don't feel the need to take part in sexually deviant communities.

I don't have any hard data to back this up, but I'd surmise that the main reason for that is that hebephiles are more likely to be non-exclusive, i.e. they can be attracted to some adults with high neoteny.

Being preferentially hebephilic myself, I'm over 99% attracted to minors and under 1% attracted to adults... but there are indeed a few adults I find attractive, as some 20-year-old girls can have the phenotype and key psychoemotional features of 14-year-olds.

However, I can imagine that if those percentages were, say, 90% and 10% respectively, I might well not be here.

Perhaps even more specifically, their non-exclusivity is normative-adjacent, so they can get along. A lot of them probably count themselves among the mainstream - in my experience the gay dating community includes a lot of "twinks only" and "trans only" I suspect to be hebephiles. I'm sure the straight equivalent exists, and may in fact be even more normalised from what I see on Instagram.

liliets wrote: Mon Feb 10, 2025 3:46 pm Girls, It surprises me that most MAPs I see are Bisexual MAPs

I'm not surprised bisexuality is high among MAPs. Children are very androgynous.