Page 2 of 2

Re: Mu Conversations: Is a MAP-Zoophile alliance a possibility?

Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2025 10:16 am
by Jim Burton
Despite the massive theoretical differences, a lot of the anti-MAPs are also anti-Zoo, anti-Necro, anti-sex.

I suppose this is because theory plays no part in the anti-sex performance. It's an afterthought.

Re: Mu Conversations: Is a MAP-Zoophile alliance a possibility?

Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2025 12:12 pm
by Fragment
Antis will find some excuse to be against the sexual practices they find gross, no matter how illogical.

The same braindead cunts that talk about “animals can’t consent to sex” will chow down on a hamburger as if animals can consent to becoming fucking mince meat.

I’m not interested in bestiality at all. But animals are property, so you can do whatever you want with them, whether it be turning them into a fucking sausage, or fucking them with your sausage. It’s not god damn rocket science.