Page 2 of 2

Re: The History of the Age of Consent: Cynicism, Feminism, and the Politics of Control (AI)

Posted: Sat May 03, 2025 5:09 pm
by LittlePrincessLover
galileo2333 wrote: Sat May 03, 2025 10:39 am Aristocratic English White girls should be declared just as sexually ready for adult men when she's 7, as (historical White perception of) Sub-Saharan African girls and Southeast Asian girls at 7. And society should protect men of no upper age limit, and of all colors and socioeconomic and geographic backgrounds, including White men, being able to have sex with girls as young as 7.
100% agreed. As long as it’s what she wants (and more often than not when it happens already it is what she wants) then it should all be allowed. If she’s ready then she’s ready. That should be no ones choice but hers.

There are preteen girls having sex with older men right now. Because they want to and because they like it. It’s happening whether some people want to accept it or not.

Re: The History of the Age of Consent: Cynicism, Feminism, and the Politics of Control (AI)

Posted: Tue Feb 10, 2026 5:43 am
by anarchist of love
By positioning themselves as the arbiters of morality and the defenders of the vulnerable, feminists aligned themselves with powerful moral and political forces. They used the AoC as a springboard for broader social reforms, expanding their influence in areas such as labor rights, suffrage, and public health. In this way, the AoC issue became a wedge for feminist political power, a tool to garner support for causes that extended far beyond the issue of consent itself. It was a means to build political capital in an era when women were still fighting for basic rights.
Not sure if anyone touched on the following fine points:

i'd put the word "reactionary" in front of "feminist" in this text. Signifying what the AI alluded to in the first sentences, a FACTION of feminism. The Reactionary feminists won the funding and were obfuscatingly called the "radical" feminists. People like Nikki Craft and so many others.

Secondly, i think it's worth pointing out that women are STILL fighting for basic rights. Recall the ERA that has NEVER gotten passed, for one. This is where the short-sightedness of glorifying those whom are allowed to get critical funding from the feds (i.e. Mondale-led Trilateralists) proves problematic in the long run. And certainly not liberating for anyone!

But, wow, AI sure can write, eh?! Whoa! The question then becomes, how long will AI be Allowed to write so well for causes being officially suppressed??