Page 2 of 2
Re: My post
Posted: Wed Oct 29, 2025 12:10 pm
by Jim Burton
I saw some mention on KF, but couldn't find the dedicated thread on FST?
Re: My post
Posted: Wed Oct 29, 2025 10:01 pm
by mrlolicon93
Jim Burton wrote: Wed Oct 29, 2025 12:10 pm
I saw some mention on KF, but couldn't find the dedicated thread on FST?
https://kiwifarms.st/threads/map-nomap-community.59084/
https://kiwifarms.st/threads/the-pedive ... nt.194261/
FSTube is mentioned in the second thread.
Re: My post
Posted: Thu Oct 30, 2025 5:56 pm
by Bookshelf
A lot of this reads like anti brainrot. Bizarre.
I find it somewhat amusing, though, that there's a significant number of comments genuinely angry at the idea of a non-contact MAP... as if they're upset at the idea that a pedophile
doesn't touch kids and almost wants them to do it just to justify being angry.
Re: My post
Posted: Fri Oct 31, 2025 3:01 am
by mrlolicon93
Bookshelf wrote: Thu Oct 30, 2025 5:56 pm
A lot of this reads like anti brainrot. Bizarre.
I find it somewhat amusing, though, that there's a significant number of comments genuinely angry at the idea of a non-contact MAP... as if they're upset at the idea that a pedophile
doesn't touch kids and almost wants them to do it just to justify being angry.
It is because they think all anti-contacts are just lying.
Re: My post
Posted: Fri Oct 31, 2025 7:47 am
by Jim Burton
Well, that's a great argument for them to make, and just further establishes they are reactionaries and thoughtcrimers. I've also been seeing it very often on socials.
Not that I expect them to face immediate backlash for it, except perhaps on those few Reddit threads where Connor Weston was kind of defended.
A few months ago, Mu published
some banners that made the argument antis are taking their target's silence for granted. It's true - they, and their delusions benefit greatly from the silence of MAPs who they know, and those who teach their children, etc.