Re: Interview questions for Mu article - please participate!
Posted: Tue Sep 17, 2024 2:08 pm
1. When did you first realize you were a MAP, and how did you feel? What were some issues you faced?
Realizing I liked teenage boys when I was a teenager myself, I felt more worry about the fact that I liked males than their age. As I got older my attraction didn't age with me and stayed focused on boys in their younger teens. I never felt particularly bad about this as it had always been a part of me- the attraction that I'd come to accept about myself when I was 17. Knowing the legal and social sanctions I'd face acting on my attractions has always been hard, though. I feel that my situation is basically what gay people in Islamic countries face- except I don't even have anywhere to emigrate to.
2. Do any other people know you're a MAP? How did they react at the time, and how do they feel about it now?
I've told quite a few people that I'm gay and like "younger guys" but I haven't specified that I'm "minor-attracted" to as many people. I think having a hebephilic orientation makes it easier for people to accept than if I liked pre-pubescents, though, and I assume that some people think I'm mostly interested in 16-19 year olds. I have lost friends. But my family stick by me. They know what kind of person I am.
3. What do you think is the biggest misunderstanding about MAPs?
That our sexuality functions any differently to adult-adult attraction. A straight man isn't seen as inherently predatory. Even if he likes to sleep around it's considered "sleezy" but in no way "evil". But when MAP sexuality is discussed it is usually assumed that the MAP enjoys victimizing or dominating. It's assumed that any romantic attention we give to minors is just "grooming" with the final goal being using them for sex. It's assumed that we're attracted to "children" as a class, rather than feeling connected to individual children. Despite me having an exclusive attraction towards teenage boys I'm sure there are many people who wouldn't trust me with their elementary school aged daughter in they knew I was a MAP. They don't realize that'd be like saying "I don't trust you around my 50-year-old wife" to a 25-year-old gay man. Adult-attracted men aren't seen as a threat to their adult siblings, yet MAPs who are fathers are seen as a threat to their own children. As if the incest taboo uniquely doesn't apply to us. Looking at CSA data and thinking that it applies to all MAPs is like looking at rape data and thinking it applies to all straight men.
4. What part of being a MAP do you struggle with the most?
A lot of people will mention the stigma, but personally I'm not too worried about what other people think as long as they let me go about my own business. But it doesn't end with "I hate pedos"- people will actively try to stop us from having access to housing or employment, regardless of our sexual and criminal history. Non-offending MAPs can be treated as badly as registered sex offenders in many cases.
Yet even despite that being a problem, the biggest struggle for me is the loneliness. MAPs don't have any legal way to share intimacy with their desired partners and sexual intimacy is a core human need. Some people can be happy living a life of celibacy and finding fulfilment elsewhere. I'm not one of them. My desire for romantic connection- to give and receive love (including sexual intimacy)- is overwhelming and being denied it is heartbreaking. (Yet, as per the previous response, this would only be seen as "wanting to satiate sick desires". My heartbreak isn't acknowledged as heartbreaking.)
5. What has been your worst experience as a MAP?
Getting arrested. You lose everything- including your own identity.
6. How do you think social attitudes toward MAPs are harmful to us and our friends and families?
I think it varies depending on a bunch of variables. At one end the MAP stays silent and isn't able to have an open and honest relationship with their family, but there is no burden on friends and family beyond that. Such a MAP carries their secret and burden by themselves to their grave. In some cases this can mean a situation where a MAP commits suicide but because they never came out, their friends and family never know why and are denied full closure.
On the other extreme are MAPs who end up on the wrong side of the law and whose families become secondary victims of the legal process. Including being "outed" as the family of an offender, with the associated stigma (especially if they choose to support their family). It's even worse for family of people forced to register, who have to choose between losing that family member entirely, or being subject to many of the same restrictions as the registrant.
7. Do you think the stigmatization of MAPs presents any risks to children?
Most obvious is MAPs that are minors themselves. The risk of suicide amongst LGBT youth is still higher than that of straight youth. Yet being LGBT is largely accepted and there can be the hope that "it gets better". Minor MAPs have no such hop to hold on to. It is taboo to say that "fagg*ts should die", but "ped*s should die" is accepted discourse. Minor MAPs are aware of what they face going forward and many will opt for suicide- a suicide that will go unnoticed by society because even if their suicide note they'll be too ashamed to come out and explain their reason for choosing death.
For non-MAP minors I think there are risks too. Particularly surrounding the entire narrative- the myths surrounding adult-child sexual contact take away the voices of minors, including those who are abused. The harsh legal penalties also mean there is a chilling effect where some minors choose to avoid talking about their experiences because of worry for an offender that they care about. The victim narrative means that adolescents are robbed of their potential sexuality- even with other minors- because sex is assumed to be traumatic. "Stranger danger" myths and a lack of adequate sexual education also mean that minors aren't aware of how to avoid the kinds of relationships that can be exploitative (remember a lot of abuse takes place in the family home). Hysteria creates imaginary problems at the expense of calmly dealing with actual problems.
8. What changes are needed?
It's hard to see a clear path forward for MAPs to normalization that keeps the current legal sanctions in place. So long as sex is seen as "a fate worse than death" for a minor (regardless of how much they agreed to it or enjoyed it) then the attitudes towards MAPs will remain. Burning 1,000 non-offending MAPs (who have a 1 in 1000 risk of offending in the future) alive will be seen as acceptable because it saves one child. All the while ignoring the fact that sexual abuse is continuing, no matter how harsh the penalties get. All the while ignoring that targeting MAPs will not prevent the majority of CSA cases that are made up of situational offending (including by family). The lives of MAPs, even offending MAPs, need to be seen as having innate value. So long as we're othered as monsters nothing will change.
9. Are there any positives of being a MAP?
This may not be true of all MAPs, but in my case connections I was able to build with minors (including those I'm not attracted to!). I tend to want to give minors more autonomy than most adults do when I interact with them. I don't see them as "kids" but as "people". I think because I see teens as potential sexual partners it pushes down the age at which I think minors are capable of various things. Obviously I don't believe toddlers should be driving or anything, and believing in the ability of minors isn't unique to MAPs. But I think being a MAP makes the capacity of kids easier to see.
Realizing I liked teenage boys when I was a teenager myself, I felt more worry about the fact that I liked males than their age. As I got older my attraction didn't age with me and stayed focused on boys in their younger teens. I never felt particularly bad about this as it had always been a part of me- the attraction that I'd come to accept about myself when I was 17. Knowing the legal and social sanctions I'd face acting on my attractions has always been hard, though. I feel that my situation is basically what gay people in Islamic countries face- except I don't even have anywhere to emigrate to.
2. Do any other people know you're a MAP? How did they react at the time, and how do they feel about it now?
I've told quite a few people that I'm gay and like "younger guys" but I haven't specified that I'm "minor-attracted" to as many people. I think having a hebephilic orientation makes it easier for people to accept than if I liked pre-pubescents, though, and I assume that some people think I'm mostly interested in 16-19 year olds. I have lost friends. But my family stick by me. They know what kind of person I am.
3. What do you think is the biggest misunderstanding about MAPs?
That our sexuality functions any differently to adult-adult attraction. A straight man isn't seen as inherently predatory. Even if he likes to sleep around it's considered "sleezy" but in no way "evil". But when MAP sexuality is discussed it is usually assumed that the MAP enjoys victimizing or dominating. It's assumed that any romantic attention we give to minors is just "grooming" with the final goal being using them for sex. It's assumed that we're attracted to "children" as a class, rather than feeling connected to individual children. Despite me having an exclusive attraction towards teenage boys I'm sure there are many people who wouldn't trust me with their elementary school aged daughter in they knew I was a MAP. They don't realize that'd be like saying "I don't trust you around my 50-year-old wife" to a 25-year-old gay man. Adult-attracted men aren't seen as a threat to their adult siblings, yet MAPs who are fathers are seen as a threat to their own children. As if the incest taboo uniquely doesn't apply to us. Looking at CSA data and thinking that it applies to all MAPs is like looking at rape data and thinking it applies to all straight men.
4. What part of being a MAP do you struggle with the most?
A lot of people will mention the stigma, but personally I'm not too worried about what other people think as long as they let me go about my own business. But it doesn't end with "I hate pedos"- people will actively try to stop us from having access to housing or employment, regardless of our sexual and criminal history. Non-offending MAPs can be treated as badly as registered sex offenders in many cases.
Yet even despite that being a problem, the biggest struggle for me is the loneliness. MAPs don't have any legal way to share intimacy with their desired partners and sexual intimacy is a core human need. Some people can be happy living a life of celibacy and finding fulfilment elsewhere. I'm not one of them. My desire for romantic connection- to give and receive love (including sexual intimacy)- is overwhelming and being denied it is heartbreaking. (Yet, as per the previous response, this would only be seen as "wanting to satiate sick desires". My heartbreak isn't acknowledged as heartbreaking.)
5. What has been your worst experience as a MAP?
Getting arrested. You lose everything- including your own identity.
6. How do you think social attitudes toward MAPs are harmful to us and our friends and families?
I think it varies depending on a bunch of variables. At one end the MAP stays silent and isn't able to have an open and honest relationship with their family, but there is no burden on friends and family beyond that. Such a MAP carries their secret and burden by themselves to their grave. In some cases this can mean a situation where a MAP commits suicide but because they never came out, their friends and family never know why and are denied full closure.
On the other extreme are MAPs who end up on the wrong side of the law and whose families become secondary victims of the legal process. Including being "outed" as the family of an offender, with the associated stigma (especially if they choose to support their family). It's even worse for family of people forced to register, who have to choose between losing that family member entirely, or being subject to many of the same restrictions as the registrant.
7. Do you think the stigmatization of MAPs presents any risks to children?
Most obvious is MAPs that are minors themselves. The risk of suicide amongst LGBT youth is still higher than that of straight youth. Yet being LGBT is largely accepted and there can be the hope that "it gets better". Minor MAPs have no such hop to hold on to. It is taboo to say that "fagg*ts should die", but "ped*s should die" is accepted discourse. Minor MAPs are aware of what they face going forward and many will opt for suicide- a suicide that will go unnoticed by society because even if their suicide note they'll be too ashamed to come out and explain their reason for choosing death.
For non-MAP minors I think there are risks too. Particularly surrounding the entire narrative- the myths surrounding adult-child sexual contact take away the voices of minors, including those who are abused. The harsh legal penalties also mean there is a chilling effect where some minors choose to avoid talking about their experiences because of worry for an offender that they care about. The victim narrative means that adolescents are robbed of their potential sexuality- even with other minors- because sex is assumed to be traumatic. "Stranger danger" myths and a lack of adequate sexual education also mean that minors aren't aware of how to avoid the kinds of relationships that can be exploitative (remember a lot of abuse takes place in the family home). Hysteria creates imaginary problems at the expense of calmly dealing with actual problems.
8. What changes are needed?
It's hard to see a clear path forward for MAPs to normalization that keeps the current legal sanctions in place. So long as sex is seen as "a fate worse than death" for a minor (regardless of how much they agreed to it or enjoyed it) then the attitudes towards MAPs will remain. Burning 1,000 non-offending MAPs (who have a 1 in 1000 risk of offending in the future) alive will be seen as acceptable because it saves one child. All the while ignoring the fact that sexual abuse is continuing, no matter how harsh the penalties get. All the while ignoring that targeting MAPs will not prevent the majority of CSA cases that are made up of situational offending (including by family). The lives of MAPs, even offending MAPs, need to be seen as having innate value. So long as we're othered as monsters nothing will change.
9. Are there any positives of being a MAP?
This may not be true of all MAPs, but in my case connections I was able to build with minors (including those I'm not attracted to!). I tend to want to give minors more autonomy than most adults do when I interact with them. I don't see them as "kids" but as "people". I think because I see teens as potential sexual partners it pushes down the age at which I think minors are capable of various things. Obviously I don't believe toddlers should be driving or anything, and believing in the ability of minors isn't unique to MAPs. But I think being a MAP makes the capacity of kids easier to see.