MAP Forum

Posted: **Sat Mar 22, 2025 3:11 pm**

I see they made the HIV analogy in their review.

I suggested some of their authors set their sights on the two Wikipedia articles that misrepresent "Pedophile Advocacy" groups and provide outdated information. This could be done by writing a citable journal article on present-day MAP initiatives.

Posted: **Sun Mar 23, 2025 9:16 am**

Salter's piece itself, in referencing some "MAP activist groups" could help with those articles, yes?

Posted: **Sun Apr 13, 2025 7:34 pm**

There is now a reply from the Harper group, and a reply to the reply.

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.117 ... 0251332197

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.117 ... 0251332198

Salter just puts out an enormous invitation to list and immortalise the "groups" by repeating my concept of a "MAP Movement". I thought he was against adopting language on the basis of where it came from?

MAP Forum

A Review of Academic Use of the Term “Minor Attracted Persons”

Re: A Review of Academic Use of the Term “Minor Attracted Persons”

Re: A Review of Academic Use of the Term “Minor Attracted Persons”

Re: A Review of Academic Use of the Term “Minor Attracted Persons”