MAP Forum

In my opinion, terms like grooming and rape are very serious terms with were created to describe specific and serious situations, but both of which have been coopted to serve an agenda which weakens the meaning of those terms and exposes people to increased risk who were supposed to be protected by those terms.

Rape is a terrible thing to happen, where one person forces or pressures another into sex against their will or without consent. But that term has been expanded out to include anyone having sex with someone in an age range with the justification that people in that age range have no ability or right to give consent, and no will. That removes rights from young people and reduces their self empowerment or respect while diluting the seriousness of actual rape. Dilluting the serious crime of rape in this way could lead to an increase in actual rape crime while leaving victims feeling that what they've endured is less than how serious it really was.

Grooming is a terrible thing to happen, when someone manipulates another in any way, especially if it's manipulating someone into sex or into harmful situations such as drugs, crime or seclusion. But as with the term rape, it has been expanded to include anyone who has a relationship with a child where a relationship leads to anything that doesn't fit with social norms. It doesn't even have to lead to anything, it can just be someone who is identified as a pedophile talking to and having a friendship with a child. That map might genuinely care for the child, listen to the child, be a support for the child, help with real problems such as bullying advice or dealing with abuse in the home. But as soon as it's identified that one person is a pedophile and the other a child and they have a friendly relationship then the term grooming won't be far behind. If a friendship goes further and leads to even just a kiss, you can be sure that the pedophile will be accused of grooming. The effect is that grooming is a dilluted term that again distracts from the seriousness of actual grooming of anybody of any age and could lead to an increase in actual grooming and victims.

Outis wrote: Mon Oct 14, 2024 9:35 am Grooming is a terrible thing to happen, when someone manipulates another in any way, especially if it's manipulating someone into sex or into harmful situations such as drugs, crime or seclusion.

There are many other words for this (deception, manipulation, etc.) But the term "grooming" is deliberately used to dehumanize things like friendliness, caring, flirting. Since society denies youth sexuality, they needed a term that would support their delusion that a minor is always being maliciously manipulated by an "adult pervert"

Harlan wrote: Mon Oct 14, 2024 3:49 pm

Outis wrote: Mon Oct 14, 2024 9:35 am Grooming is a terrible thing to happen, when someone manipulates another in any way, especially if it's manipulating someone into sex or into harmful situations such as drugs, crime or seclusion.

There are many other words for this (deception, manipulation, etc.) But the term "grooming" is deliberately used to dehumanize things like friendliness, caring, flirting. Since society denies youth sexuality, they needed a term that would support their delusion that a minor is always being maliciously manipulated by an "adult pervert"

That's very true.

Brain O'Conner wrote: Fri Oct 11, 2024 12:50 pm

Red Rodent wrote: Fri Oct 11, 2024 12:31 pm

Brain O'Conner wrote: Fri Oct 11, 2024 12:50 am


I beg to differ. While you're are right in a way that prepubescent children do those things out of curiosity, a lot don't solely do it out of curiosity with no sexual feelings attached.

I don't see how we differ here. Kids find lots of things sexually arousing. However, the focus does change with puberty. It's quite normal for five-year-olds to find poo and snot erotic, and they are likely to enjoy playing with their genitals, but show them a romantic scene in a movie and many, if not most, will find it boring.

I may have misunderstood you then. But even so, there are a lot of kids that are five or six years old that get turn on whether they are exposed to erotic things such seeing their parents or other people having sex, particular body parts about a man or womans body, erotic poses or dances, and so on and so forth. I would also state the fact that children that young do have romantic feelings as anybody else would have them for and reenact the things they see from a movie to express the feelings and desires they want with a person. Again, none of this stuff is puberty dependent. I didn't really know that children that young get aroused over poo or snot though; I never heard of that one before

I agree with Brian. Most kids are curious once they were born. My earliest memory is being maybe 3 with a hand on while watching X-Men 2 (although that movie is kinda dirty) my female cousin and I would play a dirty form of truth or dare when we were 4 and for the longest I was convinced I was sexually abused as a baby because that be the only explanation to why I was so horny. I would grope mannequins in stores, watch dirty movies in secret in my bedroom, try to come on to adults and other kids. This was when I was 3-7 but when society told me kids can’t be sexual. When my mom would tell me to close my eyes during a kissing scene that was when I became very sexually reclusive. Kids are naturally sexual beings whether society wants to admit it or not. It’s just the question that is it wrong if an adult decides to be apart of the awakening. I’m personally into middle school girls so I don’t know about anything like that but it does beg a lot of questions.

Brain O'Conner wrote: Fri Oct 11, 2024 12:50 pm ...there are a lot of kids that are five or six years old that get turn on whether they are exposed to erotic things such seeing their parents or other people having sex, particular body parts about a man or womans body, erotic poses or dances, and so on and so forth. I would also state the fact that children that young do have romantic feelings as anybody else would have them for and reenact the things they see from a movie to express the feelings and desires they want with a person. Again, none of this stuff is puberty dependent. ...

I remember very well, from the age of 4 I experienced erotic attraction to boys, at first it was expressed in an interest in nudity and fantasies about being seen naked. Leafing through The Jungle Book with its colorful illustrations of a nearly naked Mowgli, I felt sexual arousal. Especially when Mowgli was completely naked. I wanted to take off the dolls' clothes or look into their panties. I already mentioned that when I was in kindergarten, another boy and I had a strong sexual desire, we went into seclusion, started undressing and petting until we were caught.

Fragment wrote: Fri Oct 25, 2024 11:23 am Been thinking about grooming a bit more. Read this link.

https://www.ceopeducation.co.uk/parents ... -grooming/

Building a relationship.
Grooming is about making a child think that abuse and exploitation is normal, or that they have no choice. Offenders do this by building a relationship and emotional connection with the child.

What might be happening?

• trying to convince the child that they are in a loving relationship as boyfriend or girlfriend
• relationship building over a short space of time – not seeking to be a boyfriend or girlfriend, but to make a quick connection. May be through flattery or pretending to have lots in common
• becoming a mentor to the young person, making them think they are someone who can help them or teach them things
• becoming a dominant figure in a young person’s life, perhaps by having a relationship with their parent or carer
• building a relationship with the child’s family, making them think that they are someone who can be trusted with the child.

Gaining power over a child.
In all grooming, the offender will try to gain power over the child, to manipulate or coerce them.

What might be happening?

• emotionally intimidating the child by threatening to withdraw their affection or saying things like, ‘if you loved me you would’
• telling the child there will be terrible consequences for refusing to do something sexual
• mimicking love. If a young person feels they are in love, this gives an offender power
• developing a dependency on drugs or alcohol so they can control them through addiction
• meeting a need, such as emotional needs, shelter, money

Keeping it secret.
In all cases offenders will try to make sure that the child doesn’t tell anyone else about the abuse.

What might be happening?

• telling the child that no one will believe them
• threatening to share secrets that the child has told them
• telling children that they have done something illegal and will be in trouble
• using the above power advantages against the child

To be honest, many of those behaviors do sound coercive. The ones in blue, in opinions aren’t (necessarily) grooming though, just indicative of care and affection.

Funnily just talking to a minor and showing interest is seen as grooming now though. If it was used to refer to coercive behaviors like on this list I’d have much less of a problem with it.

The term was always going to be set up for abuse, especially for people that have a problem even with adult age-gap couples, given how loaded it is even when applied to adult-minor couples. And to be honest, it doesn't even have to exist. We already have terminology to describe such coercive behaviour, and they're called "coercion" and "manipulation". No need to make up a new term to describe an already-existing phenomenon.

You might find it interesting how the term "grooming" in this context originated from a 1980s report to describe seduction of girls by men. So the trappings for what it is now were already there.

Fragment wrote: Fri Oct 25, 2024 11:23 am https://www.ceopeducation.co.uk/parents ... -grooming/

Building a relationship.
Grooming is about making a child think that abuse and exploitation is normal, or that they have no choice. Offenders do this by building a relationship and emotional connection with the child
...

Gaining power over a child.
In all grooming, the offender will try to gain power over the child, to manipulate or coerce them
...

Keeping it secret.
In all cases offenders will try to make sure that the child doesn’t tell anyone else about the abuse
...

Total bullshit.
Having a false idea of "innocence", they construct false concepts that support the false idea. The purpose of this concept is to dehumanize the standard friendly, mentoring, romantic communication between two people. The fact that the ageist dogma against intergenerational relationships has become entrenched in society it has forced society to come up with an "explanation" that should instill why normal adult behavior is "not normal".

When people meet and communicate, they always try to show friendliness. Both have a choice to stop communicating or continue (especially online). It is society's rejection of inter-age relationships that forces them to keep the secret, and not the adult's malicious intent. On the contrary, if these relationships could be open, it would increase the safety of minors, allowing them to pay attention to and respond to truly dangerous behavior and not ruin healthy relationships

Fragment wrote: Sun Oct 27, 2024 2:12 am If "gaining power" and "keeping secrets" are requirements for grooming, then there's a lot of people having illegal relationships where they don't groom at all.

This concept dehumanizes and criminalizes any normal 1 on 1 inter-age communication. It does not allow any personal attention, compliment, gifts, etc. All of this will be regarded as malicious bribery to "gain power".

When a Scottish minister complimented a 16-year-old boy on Instagram, his behaviour was branded unacceptable and he was forced to resign.

Fragment wrote: Fri Nov 01, 2024 12:28 am Anyone pedi repost that’s relevant:

Talking to a minor is not grooming.

Talking to a minor about sex is not grooming.

Talking to a minor sexually is not grooming.

Showing overt sexual interest in a minor is not grooming.

Doing something sexual with a minor after building a relationship with them is not grooming.


Grooming refers to a specific type of coercive behavior, usually threatening or deceptive in nature. It does not mean "any interaction between a minor an unrelated adult".

In addition
Honest friendship and romance with a minor is not "grooming".
Honest compliments, care and gifts are not "grooming"

I don’t like the term because a strictly platonic friendship between an adult and child can be misconstrued as grooming. If it needs to be used, it should be applied after the fact to behaviors that culminated in unwanted sexual contact.