MAP Forum

I disagree. Only 1 and 2 are bad because they are artificial creations of economic pressure.

Let me list the four models of families

1) Single parent family
2) Nuclear Family (mom dad kids)
3) Extended family (mom dad aunts uncles grand parents all in the same roof raising kids)
4) Communal child rearing (the whole community/village model)

Early human history was a mix of 3) and 4) but the parents in normal cases knew their offspring, so it wasn't promiscuity norms like Marxist believe and further more, in modern day when the nuclear family was destroyed capitalism kept going. Showing evidence that the nuclear family is not the fuel of capitalism - because a single funko pop collecting consumer drinking soymilk fuels capitalism far better then the nuclear family ever did. The most common model before industrial capitalism was a very strong family, it was mother and father surrounded by uncles, aunts, grandparents, and siblings all under the same roof with the community chipping in, and if you go back to prehistoric times you see more like 4) but with one major exception communal/village families of the past had the biological parents are the forefront and everyone else chipped in. The bio parents were the first layer of the band, and aunts uncles and community was the second and third. Marxist tried to say communal families were promiscuous and no one knew whos kids belonged to whom, when in reality it was a band model with bio parents at the front and the community surrounding them with many extended family/village family hybrids.

The only way to bring back the extended family is to make it where people can afford large houses and land to live on. That way mom dad, grandma, grandma, aunts and uncles can all live under the same roof like they did 100s of years ago. The only way to bring back communal families is to directly challenge strong social norms and stigmas which may be virtually impossible because our society can accommodate nuclear and extended in theory but village would require small communities that volunteer and adhere to behaviors that are not socially acceptable.

In a sense the village family never died because when I was a kid i would go around and interact with neighbors and they would give me food and advice once in a while, but it wasn't mandatory communal care, just friendly people. Maybe the best alternative to communal family today are just really good family friends that chip in significantly, but even they are expected boundaries.

Not all, but so many are!

In a nuclear family, most definitely!
In an extended/villager family not so much. There are more people to go to, parents don't get all worn out and start screaming at their kids, etc.

Dr Fritz Bernard:
https://heretictoc.com/wp-content/uploa ... 1.5012.jpg

Here are a list of crimes committed by parents and anti pedos in the name of "saving children" from so called "elite satanic pedo ritual abuse". It includes qanon, pizzagate, and mcmartin.

https://text.is/1XN3J

I believe satanic pedo conspiracies are a reflection of ancient parental instincts from a prehistoric world of high childhood mortality, with these strong parental instincts being mistargeted at minor attracted people. But you can interpret the data anyway you want, But the data is in. These crimes are real, and most were committed under the guise of saving children and satanic panic was one of the most costly and longest criminal trials in US history with 7 million USD wasted.

The crazy conspiracy theorists are not worth anyone's time. They're out there frothing at the mouth about the Illuminati and lizard people and satanic cults but you can usually tell instantly the type. There will always be the uneducated crazies out there, the Inbredibles, I don't worry about them, I trust in the gene pool to clean itself up naturally over time.

Lol. There should be child lover cult that has per rule to do all kids want.