Page 2 of 3

Re: Nepios

Posted: Fri Nov 07, 2025 9:19 am
by Officerkrupke
Cunny Defender wrote: Thu Nov 06, 2025 11:42 pm I'm usually a proud MAP, but i gotta be honest, nepios make me feel ashamed and dumbfounded on behalf of the MAP community
What’s your AoA?

Re: Nepios

Posted: Fri Nov 07, 2025 9:20 am
by Not Forever
Cunny Defender wrote: Fri Nov 07, 2025 9:12 amMate, keep the respectful tone here. You aren't going to compare attraction to teens to people that just came out of the freaking womb. It's because of people like you that MAPs are seen as ridiculous. [redacted rule 6/7]
It feels a bit strange to read this comment right after seeing people on YouTube blaming MAPs for making the Transgender and Queer community look ridiculous. Considering that we live in a time when a thirty-year-old who sleeps with a twenty-year-old is called a “pedophile”, I’d honestly avoid pointing fingers at others — let alone talking about “degeneracy”.

Re: Nepios

Posted: Fri Nov 07, 2025 9:26 am
by Cunny Defender
BLueRibbon wrote: Fri Nov 07, 2025 8:02 am
Cunny Defender wrote: Thu Nov 06, 2025 11:42 pm I'm usually a proud MAP, but i gotta be honest, nepios make me feel ashamed and dumbfounded on behalf of the MAP community
Why?

I don't get an attraction to infants, but it's not like nepis are here pissing in my coffee.

But by the way nepis, if you ever do come and piss in my coffee, we're going to have a problem, OK?
If someone is attracted to infants, they should keep this to themselves; it's simply a ridiculous and unrealistic attraction. Let's say this attraction were legalized. What are you going to do? It has no romantic capacity, no sexual capacity, or really any capacity at all

Re: Nepios

Posted: Fri Nov 07, 2025 9:32 am
by Cunny Defender
Not Forever wrote: Fri Nov 07, 2025 9:20 am
Cunny Defender wrote: Fri Nov 07, 2025 9:12 amMate, keep the respectful tone here. You aren't going to compare attraction to teens to people that just came out of the freaking womb. It's because of people like you that MAPs are seen as ridiculous. [redacted rule 6/7]
It feels a bit strange to read this comment right after seeing people on YouTube blaming MAPs for making the Transgender and Queer community look ridiculous. Considering that we live in a time when a thirty-year-old who sleeps with a twenty-year-old is called a “pedophile”, I’d honestly avoid pointing fingers at others — let alone talking about “degeneracy”.
Just because some people are confused about things doesn't mean that everything must be right suddenly

Re: Nepios

Posted: Fri Nov 07, 2025 9:37 am
by Cunny Defender
Officerkrupke wrote: Fri Nov 07, 2025 9:19 am
Cunny Defender wrote: Thu Nov 06, 2025 11:42 pm I'm usually a proud MAP, but i gotta be honest, nepios make me feel ashamed and dumbfounded on behalf of the MAP community
What’s your AoA?
I don't really have an age of attraction, but i would say that when it gets under 6, then it begins to get too young

Re: Nepios

Posted: Fri Nov 07, 2025 9:42 am
by Not Forever
Cunny Defender wrote: Fri Nov 07, 2025 9:32 amJust because some people are confused about things doesn't mean that everything must be right suddenly
What would people be confused about?
The point isn’t that they misuse the term “pedophile” — the point is that people don’t think badly of you because of the Nepios. They think badly of you because they believe the age gap makes every sexual or romantic relationship into rape, even when it’s consensual. Since people see any sexual relationship as potentially traumatic, with effects worse than death, MAPs end up being seen as they are seen.

You wouldn’t solve anything by sweeping them under the rug, and you would also be repeating the same behavior that is reserved for MAPs, placing them in yet another category considered even lower.

Re: Nepios

Posted: Fri Nov 07, 2025 10:27 am
by BLueRibbon
Cunny Defender wrote: Fri Nov 07, 2025 9:26 am
BLueRibbon wrote: Fri Nov 07, 2025 8:02 am
Cunny Defender wrote: Thu Nov 06, 2025 11:42 pm I'm usually a proud MAP, but i gotta be honest, nepios make me feel ashamed and dumbfounded on behalf of the MAP community
Why?

I don't get an attraction to infants, but it's not like nepis are here pissing in my coffee.

But by the way nepis, if you ever do come and piss in my coffee, we're going to have a problem, OK?
If someone is attracted to infants, they should keep this to themselves; it's simply a ridiculous and unrealistic attraction. Let's say this attraction were legalized. What are you going to do? It has no romantic capacity, no sexual capacity, or really any capacity at all
Nepis would probably tell you that they're not looking to impose any kind of adult sexuality on extremely young children.

And let's take your claim of 'no capacity' at face value. That doesn't mean they're 'degenerates', nor does it mean they should be forced to hide.

You're drawing the line right behind your own feet. Not cool.

Re: Nepios

Posted: Fri Nov 07, 2025 2:12 pm
by Jim Burton
I split the complaint-thread on the "degenerate" subject as pertains to moderation norms from Joanne's thread on Nepiophilia, and it can be found here.

Users are reminded to keep the conversation on-topic, address complaints in a report, or to the Improving MAP Forum section for more general inquiries.

Complaining about moderation in-thread is frowned upon, and against our rules. We rely on a small team of moderators, all of whom are volunteers, and aim to maintain good-faith via efficient moderation actions that protect the overall mission of the board, and protect its future.

Re: Nepios

Posted: Fri Nov 07, 2025 3:29 pm
by Learning to undeny
Cunny Defender wrote: Fri Nov 07, 2025 9:26 am If someone is attracted to infants, they should keep this to themselves; it's simply a ridiculous and unrealistic attraction. Let's say this attraction were legalized. What are you going to do? It has no romantic capacity, no sexual capacity, or really any capacity at all
The attraction to infants is "legalized" already, and it's "realistic" if they have it. And what would keeping it to themselves achieve? Apart from not been seen as degenerates...

Re: Nepios

Posted: Fri Nov 07, 2025 3:46 pm
by Cunny Defender
Learning to undeny wrote: Fri Nov 07, 2025 3:29 pm
Cunny Defender wrote: Fri Nov 07, 2025 9:26 am If someone is attracted to infants, they should keep this to themselves; it's simply a ridiculous and unrealistic attraction. Let's say this attraction were legalized. What are you going to do? It has no romantic capacity, no sexual capacity, or really any capacity at all
The attraction to infants is "legalized" already, and it's "realistic" if they have it. And what would keeping it to themselves achieve? Apart from not been seen as degenerates...
I ain't going to continue this conversation; this isn't a serious thing to discuss