Re: Nepios
Posted: Fri Nov 07, 2025 9:19 am
What’s your AoA?Cunny Defender wrote: Thu Nov 06, 2025 11:42 pm I'm usually a proud MAP, but i gotta be honest, nepios make me feel ashamed and dumbfounded on behalf of the MAP community
What’s your AoA?Cunny Defender wrote: Thu Nov 06, 2025 11:42 pm I'm usually a proud MAP, but i gotta be honest, nepios make me feel ashamed and dumbfounded on behalf of the MAP community
It feels a bit strange to read this comment right after seeing people on YouTube blaming MAPs for making the Transgender and Queer community look ridiculous. Considering that we live in a time when a thirty-year-old who sleeps with a twenty-year-old is called a “pedophile”, I’d honestly avoid pointing fingers at others — let alone talking about “degeneracy”.Cunny Defender wrote: Fri Nov 07, 2025 9:12 amMate, keep the respectful tone here. You aren't going to compare attraction to teens to people that just came out of the freaking womb. It's because of people like you that MAPs are seen as ridiculous. [redacted rule 6/7]
If someone is attracted to infants, they should keep this to themselves; it's simply a ridiculous and unrealistic attraction. Let's say this attraction were legalized. What are you going to do? It has no romantic capacity, no sexual capacity, or really any capacity at allBLueRibbon wrote: Fri Nov 07, 2025 8:02 amWhy?Cunny Defender wrote: Thu Nov 06, 2025 11:42 pm I'm usually a proud MAP, but i gotta be honest, nepios make me feel ashamed and dumbfounded on behalf of the MAP community
I don't get an attraction to infants, but it's not like nepis are here pissing in my coffee.
But by the way nepis, if you ever do come and piss in my coffee, we're going to have a problem, OK?
Just because some people are confused about things doesn't mean that everything must be right suddenlyNot Forever wrote: Fri Nov 07, 2025 9:20 amIt feels a bit strange to read this comment right after seeing people on YouTube blaming MAPs for making the Transgender and Queer community look ridiculous. Considering that we live in a time when a thirty-year-old who sleeps with a twenty-year-old is called a “pedophile”, I’d honestly avoid pointing fingers at others — let alone talking about “degeneracy”.Cunny Defender wrote: Fri Nov 07, 2025 9:12 amMate, keep the respectful tone here. You aren't going to compare attraction to teens to people that just came out of the freaking womb. It's because of people like you that MAPs are seen as ridiculous. [redacted rule 6/7]
I don't really have an age of attraction, but i would say that when it gets under 6, then it begins to get too youngOfficerkrupke wrote: Fri Nov 07, 2025 9:19 amWhat’s your AoA?Cunny Defender wrote: Thu Nov 06, 2025 11:42 pm I'm usually a proud MAP, but i gotta be honest, nepios make me feel ashamed and dumbfounded on behalf of the MAP community
What would people be confused about?Cunny Defender wrote: Fri Nov 07, 2025 9:32 amJust because some people are confused about things doesn't mean that everything must be right suddenly
Nepis would probably tell you that they're not looking to impose any kind of adult sexuality on extremely young children.Cunny Defender wrote: Fri Nov 07, 2025 9:26 amIf someone is attracted to infants, they should keep this to themselves; it's simply a ridiculous and unrealistic attraction. Let's say this attraction were legalized. What are you going to do? It has no romantic capacity, no sexual capacity, or really any capacity at allBLueRibbon wrote: Fri Nov 07, 2025 8:02 amWhy?Cunny Defender wrote: Thu Nov 06, 2025 11:42 pm I'm usually a proud MAP, but i gotta be honest, nepios make me feel ashamed and dumbfounded on behalf of the MAP community
I don't get an attraction to infants, but it's not like nepis are here pissing in my coffee.
But by the way nepis, if you ever do come and piss in my coffee, we're going to have a problem, OK?
The attraction to infants is "legalized" already, and it's "realistic" if they have it. And what would keeping it to themselves achieve? Apart from not been seen as degenerates...Cunny Defender wrote: Fri Nov 07, 2025 9:26 am If someone is attracted to infants, they should keep this to themselves; it's simply a ridiculous and unrealistic attraction. Let's say this attraction were legalized. What are you going to do? It has no romantic capacity, no sexual capacity, or really any capacity at all
I ain't going to continue this conversation; this isn't a serious thing to discussLearning to undeny wrote: Fri Nov 07, 2025 3:29 pmThe attraction to infants is "legalized" already, and it's "realistic" if they have it. And what would keeping it to themselves achieve? Apart from not been seen as degenerates...Cunny Defender wrote: Fri Nov 07, 2025 9:26 am If someone is attracted to infants, they should keep this to themselves; it's simply a ridiculous and unrealistic attraction. Let's say this attraction were legalized. What are you going to do? It has no romantic capacity, no sexual capacity, or really any capacity at all