I have something of a similar contact stance myself. I'm pretty much Anti-C on children in the single digits and mostly anti-c on those in the early double digit ranges (my AoA only starts here) but I'm pro-c starting at 12 or so. The 12+/16 thing posted here is pretty close to my stance on reforms.terminally_unique wrote: ↑Thu Oct 31, 2024 10:01 pm If I had to summarize my contact stance, it would be anti-contact for pre-pubescents (the majority of my AoA) and pro-contact for adolescents (my peak AoA).
I hate to agree, but public perception of homosexuals didn't substantially change until sodomy laws were repealed. However, a plausible first step for us would be easing mandatory reporting requirements so that we can seek MAP-friendly therapy without fear. That would involve convincing major mental health organizations to lobby legislators, which is unfortunately a tall order.
Pro-Reform: 'Soft Reforms' for community adoption
-
- Posts: 49
- Joined: Wed Jul 24, 2024 12:54 am
Re: Pro-Reform: 'Soft Reforms' for community adoption
AoA
Males : 10-13
Girls : 10 or 11 -17
Males : 10-13
Girls : 10 or 11 -17