Justincredible wrote: Tue Feb 04, 2025 3:14 am
And what's really infuriating is that even things that involve no actual children are still illegal. Like stories, art and ai.
AI has gotten so good it could be an incredible outlet for us. And literally no one is harmed. It fucking sucks.
Id argue that no one is harmed even when its not stories, art, or ai, and the government and their funded allies increasing lack of abillity to demonstrate real harm is why they have to go so hysterical and radical that they have to get rid of even FAKE DEPICTIONS of the act. They dont do this with child physical abuse or emotional abuse, or even child torture or child death/murder. You can search up videos on the clear web of kids being beaten or slapped or spanked or screamed at and gaslight or tortured or even videos of kids being fucking murdered and blown up in wars and science expiriments. And despite all the harm that comes from all these actions(even literal fucking death), no one is advocating that those pictures and videos be removed because it “fuels” child beaters or “normalizes” child murder. Right now I could search up a video of a child being fucking beaten and decapitated but since it “spreads awareness” or something, no one gaf. But if a kid is even FICTIONALLY DEPICTED getting their little dick sucked it will get me decades in prison. Im somehow supposed to believe that some teenager talking a nudie selfie is even more harmful and impactful than a kid getting their leg blown off by a mine. Yeah ok.
Of course theres the argument that people will get pleausure watching kids get sexually “abused”, but that argurment doesnt hold water when it comes to the child beaters saying “you go mama” on videos of children being screamed at, or “this is fun to watch, I hate kids that little brat deserves it” on videos of kids being beaten, or “this is funny, fuck them kids” on videos of kids literally being tortured or murderered in war videos or true crime videos. If “csa” is really that bad then like with videos of kids getting screamed at, slapped and beaten, tortured, and blown up and decapitated, then simply seeing a video of it online should actually be a good thing, as it will “spread awareness” about “horrific abuse”.
Theres also the bullshit argument that its “retraumatizing” to the victim, but once again, videos of kids being physically abused and assaulted, or emotionally abused and assaulted are somehow perfectly fine and dont “retraumatize” the victim.(Side note, how come when the police or vigilantes view PIM the “victim” is perfectly fine, but if a map views PIM the “victim” is suddenly traumatized, even if their halfway across the world, despite the police and vigillantes adding to the same view count of their “abuse”?). In fact, the former child victims of physical and emotional abuse/assault often use the documented footage of their abuse in order to fight back against gaslighting and spread awareness about the crime.
If “csa” is really that bad, horrific, traumatizing, monstrous, evil, then it shouldnt take a simple foreign cartoon depiction to suddenly “normalize” such a “horrific” form of “abuse” in the general population, or even a real life video, unless antis want to admit that every member of the general population, including themselves, is just pretending to hate it so drastically and truthfully have very loose and weak standing morals to the point where even cartoon and ai depictions of the thing they claim to be so against will make them go from good people being completely against it to wholeheartedly and fully supporting said “evil” thing.
An anti would probably also say that while they personally would still have a problem with PIM, that there would be a mass surgence of “pdfiles” and men preferring the minors to adults, but that also admits that minor attraction is extremely common in the general population, and to a certain degree, has been chosen specifically by our biology and is evolutionary valid(and theres poor reason to believe that evolution would pick something so disastrous and life ruining to potential sexual mates and caregivers yet instill that desire in such a large portion of the male population, if we are really to believe evolution would choose something so traumatizing and harmful to the fitness of young females and children in general to be so widespread, our species would not survive, or at the very least, not be so successful and prolific) that most men dont actually want or even prefer the “fully developed MILFS” they claim.
That pdfillia” isn't some rare anti biological mental illness the antis want it to be.
Its very strange that a video of a real kid being beaten wont suddenly convert everyone who is against childhood physical assault to child beating and supporting physical abuse, but some anime girl that barely resembles a human being getting railed will suddenly “normalize pdfillia”? Can these people make up their minds? Ive heard antis claim that pedophillia will never be normalized and is so against human evolution that it only exists in a small amount of socially ostracized deviants whenever I say that pedosexuality will eventually be accepted just like every other taboo sexuality but in the same breath claim that literally everything under the sun from the color pink to anime girls “normalizes pdfillia” and accuse every single man ever, even the most well liked and non deviant men of being “pdfs”.
, god I LOVE those saggy tits, sometimes I watch grandma style cooking shows just so I can catch a glimpse of those GIL-wait wrong forum