Page 4 of 4

Re: Contact Debate - ethics of the logical categories

Posted: Tue Apr 14, 2026 12:35 pm
by zarkle
I found an example to support all our claims, both mine and the others in this thread.

Here is a case where 3 contributing factors exist
https://old.reddit.com/r/adultsurvivors ... ion_story/

1) prepubescent sex contact from cousin without understanding what is going on
2) abusive angry parents
3) religious and social shame

all interacting together to create a traumatizing experience


Now let me give more examples that support my case of "rational sexual desires" not being present in many prepubescents

Ancient China knew prepubescent girls have no rational sexual drive
The Great Ming Code, 25th section, Criminal Code on Rape came into effect from 1373, raised the age of consent to 12 by stating 'girls younger than 12 lack rational sexual desires, therefore any intercourse with them is considered the same as rape and therefore punishable by death with hanging'.

--
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cEX97F8eCT8
and here is another case of a father raping his prepubescent daughter but she reports him right around the time she hits puberty, NOT a coincidence. Once the hormones kick in the moral repulsion starts, and of course the abusive behavior of his made it much worse. Still I hold an anti prepubescent incest stance. If incest must occur wait till after puberty so it can be a true informed decision.



This is why I disagree with having sex with prepubescents, despite being highly attracted to them. All I ever wanted to do is look at little Chinese girls on foreign swimwear catalog websites without triggering "child sexual abuse" laws. The goal is to figure out why some prepubescents have libidos and others don't because clearly reality is more complicated then I originally thought.