MAP Forum

So an 18-year old boy and a 15-year old girl engaged in sexually explicit chats and now she is playing the victim and acting completely blameless.

Why does the younger generation completely ignore Romeo and Juliet laws?

They exist for a reason a 18-year old kid being sexual with a 15-year old who is close in age with him does not make him a predator.

Here is the video.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UrulIyK5q9E

Absolutely disturbing and bizarre. Precisely why I believe sites like Mu are so very important to the world.
It hurts to see a young man so confused, he's clearly mentally ill and needs guidance how to deal with his feelings.
I know I could help that boy. And the girl too!

Xuxa Nuit wrote: Thu Jan 16, 2025 9:08 pm
Absolutely disturbing and bizarre. Precisely why I believe sites like Mu are so very important to the world.
It hurts to see a young man so confused, he's clearly mentally ill and needs guidance how to deal with his feelings.
I know I could help that boy. And the girl too!

I completely agree.

Fragment wrote: Fri Jan 17, 2025 3:37 am

mrlolicon93 wrote: Thu Jan 16, 2025 2:25 pm Why does the younger generation completely ignore Romeo and Juliet laws?

They exist for a reason a 18-year old kid being sexual with a 15-year old who is close in age with him does not make him a predator.

Some states don't have them, so it would be illegal. In other states the R+J laws only allow for a 2 year gap.

Personally, I'm actually against R+J laws. One of the main arguments for the age of consent is that minors don't understand sex (ie lack informed consent). If a 13 year old can't understand sex with a 30 year old, why can they understand sex with a 14 year old? It seems illogical to me.

This kid lives in Texas which from the comments i read below the video are okay with a 3-year age gap but regardless i completely agree with you.

I honestly feel sorry for this kid.

Also if what you're saying about R&J laws is true then that makes the whole thing even more muddier because correct me if I'm wrong but definitionally speaking doesn't there need to be at least a 4 or 5 year age difference between the perpetrator and the victim and they need to be at least 16+?

I also, find it really fucking suspicious that the entire conversation on the girls end is deleted as well.

I've seen where some kids even think a 1 year age difference is grooming.

jeffychubchaser29 wrote: Sun Jan 26, 2025 6:14 am I've seen where some kids even think a 1 year age difference is grooming.

Same such as a 17-year old claiming they were groomed by an 18-year old.

I don't think he is A predator. Their both teen ages. When I was growing up I had Male friends who were 18 19 years old and would be dating A girl who was 16 17 and even 15. 20+ years ago this was never and issue.

Keith wrote: Sun Jan 26, 2025 6:52 pm I don't think he is A predator. Their both teen ages. When I was growing up I had Male friends who were 18 19 years old and would be dating A girl who was 16 17 and even 15. 20+ years ago this was never and issue.

I agree.

jeffychubchaser29 wrote: Sun Jan 26, 2025 6:14 am I've seen where some kids even think a 1 year age difference is grooming.

That's insane. Hell, if that were really the case the I 95% of the human population are groomers,