MAP Forum

Im terms of advocacy, I think alternatives such AI & Dolls can really help MAPS enjoy their life without fear of the law ruining it. What's wrong with AI? No "victims", so what's thr problem. Viewing images shouldn't ever be a problem, but with AI, what's the excuse for prohibition?

Anyone aware of any [redacted]?

Here is a link for beautiful lil dolls. I wish I could have a few. If I wasn't married. My wife knows I'm a MAP. She avoids it so long as I don't across on it. I love my TikTok...

[please don't share these type of links again - mod]

I'd have a room full and dedicated to them.

I agree, but we must be careful, and not for the reasons one may typically anticipate.

Even if this is not often mentioned, the chance is not zero that the existence of MAPs (their behavior not costrained by law) is not just a quirk, but somehow functional to the overall health of human and hominid groups*. I don't know if this has been already studied in literature, but it would be interesting to explore scientifically this possibility, because a positive outcome would make a solid point in the face of rational antis.

So if we basically cut out MAPs giving them purely synthetic outlets, we might end up with unintended consequences. I'm not saying that this, in the present western societies, would not improve the well being of MAPs, but it should not divert us from fighting against unjust and harmful laws.


* Now I have been general here, and one could try to dig into at least some cause/effect networks. The most direct consequence of the present restriction of MAP-AAM interactions I can think of, is that impacting the mental health of both MAPs and AAMs. One might think that just giving synthetic outlets to both MAPs and AAMs would solve the issue. But this would just be an isolated and partial fulfillment, removing the important factor of human interaction. That this will somehow impact society as a whole is difficult to deny, as society is a complex system, where small changes can result in large consequences down the causal line.

https://prostasia.org/ - This organization was originally set up to advocate the use of childlike dolls to reduce instances of what some people would call child abuse.

Please remember to check your local laws before ordering childlike dolls.

Sharing links to childlike dolls can be interpreted as sharing links to purchase illegal material in some of the countries we serve. Please do not share links to this material.

Further, requesting information about uncensored AI can be interpreted as solicitation to illegal activity.

https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk ... n-30916923

I think society's reaction to things like fictional / drawn CP, child dolls, and maybe AI generated CP is all the evidence anyone should need to see that the prejudice against us comes from a place of purity policing, and it has nothing to do with actually 'protecting' children. It's the attraction itself they hate instead of the alleged harm acting on it causes.

I would love to have a AI doll, I can not see any reason not to. But I think there is such a prejudges out there that anything is resembles MAP is considered wrong

FairBlueLove wrote: Mon Mar 03, 2025 10:34 am One might think that just giving synthetic outlets to both MAPs and AAMs would solve the issue.

Yes, but it would not help the moral minority "outer party" types maintain power, and would take away something to use as a easy target for the manipulated proles to experience their daily "Two
Minutes Hate", and feel morally superior.

Jim Burton wrote: Mon Mar 03, 2025 1:38 pm Sharing links to childlike dolls can be interpreted as sharing links to purchase illegal material in some of the countries we serve. Please do not share links to this material.

Further, requesting information about uncensored AI can be interpreted as solicitation to illegal activity.

https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk ... n-30916923

I truly feel for folks in the UK, freedoms of expression are whithering there constantly.

CLover36 wrote: Sat Mar 08, 2025 1:18 pm I truly feel for folks in the UK, freedoms of expression are whithering there constantly.

That's the trouble with having a common law system instead of a written constitution, you can't appeal to fundamental rights like with the US constitution. In theory, virtually any law could be passed in parliament if it was sufficiently popular regardless of whether it severely violated human rights.

The closest thing you have that you could appeal to is the European Convention on Human Rights.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_ ... man_Rights

America has it's problems, but this is one thing they are decidedly better about it, in my opinion.

Why not, exactly! Exactly,, Why Not?!