Page 1 of 3
My introduction
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2025 2:04 am
by Doxinator14
Yo I'm terrible at introductions and I'm from Canada (my English is not very good

) I'm 14, I'm a boy and a LAM (Ladies Attracted Minor

and girls my age but it's mainly physical) I have find this forum today because I was searching on the web of it was like normal to be attracted to adults as a minor or if I was like... Just weird or something. I don't know what other things to say... I like burgers, the colour red, skateboarding, gaming, cars and modding my scooter

you can talk to me in English ou en franΓ§ais ! I don't know how to end that sorry

Re: My introduction
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2025 2:06 am
by Fragment
Welcome.
Be careful with a username with βdoxβ in it! People might get the wrong idea.
Re: My introduction
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2025 2:22 am
by Doxinator14
Fragment wrote: Mon Apr 14, 2025 2:06 am
Welcome.
Be careful with a username with βdoxβ in it! People might get the wrong idea.
Oups I'm really sorry I have not think about that... I have wanted a mix of my first name and Β« Terminator Β»

Re: My introduction
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2025 2:35 am
by WavesInEternity
Welcome! You hail from a rather fascinating place; Montreal is such a great city. I agree with Anthony Bourdain that it's the most interesting city in Canada.
Being attracted to older women at your age is totally normal. In high school, most of my friends were... I was the exception. As a rule of thumb, the age range you're attracted to in early adolescence will stay the age range you'll be attracted to for the rest of your life. So, congratulations, you're a confirmed
teleiophile (as the page rightly points out, "legal majority is not prerequisite for teleiophilia"). In other words, you're a very "normal" straight male. At your age, I was obsessed with
lolicon and in denial about what it entailed regarding my sexuality. I hoped I'd "grow out of it": after all, the girls in those drawings were similar in age to myself. I never did. I'm still attracted to younger girls, and I still absolutely
love lolicon.
Vast evidence demonstrates that boys are more receptive than girls to sexual contact with adults, especially women. So receptive, in fact, that they even counter-intuitively report a
positive reaction to
coercive sexual contact with adults
in nearly half of cases.

Re: My introduction
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2025 3:16 am
by Doxinator14
WavesInEternity wrote: Mon Apr 14, 2025 2:35 am
Welcome! You hail from a rather fascinating place; Montreal is such a great city. I agree with Anthony Bourdain that it's the most interesting city in Canada.
Being attracted to older women at your age is totally normal. In high school, most of my friends were... I was the exception. As a rule of thumb, the age range you're attracted to in early adolescence will stay the age range you'll be attracted to for the rest of your life. So, congratulations, you're a confirmed
teleiophile (as the page rightly points out, "legal majority is not prerequisite for teleiophilia"). In other words, you're a very "normal" straight male. At your age, I was obsessed with
lolicon and in denial about what it entailed regarding my sexuality. I hoped I'd "grow out of it": after all, the girls in those drawings were similar in age to myself. I never did. I'm still attracted to younger girls, and I still absolutely
love lolicon.
Vast evidence demonstrates that boys are more receptive than girls to sexual contact with adults, especially women. So receptive, in fact, that they even counter-intuitively report a
positive reaction to
coercive sexual contact with adults
in nearly half of cases.
I'm not in Montreal

And Anthony Bourdain had great cooking shows I still watch them sometimes ! Thank you for the information it's interesting to read

and like to be honest yeah I'm attracted to the ladies
but when I'm really excited I'm more receptive to like contact in general so

I don't know what that makes me
Re: My introduction
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2025 4:22 am
by WavesInEternity
Doxinator14 wrote: Mon Apr 14, 2025 3:16 am
I'm not in Montreal
That wasn't what I was implying, apologies for being unclear! I just meant that it's a city in the Quebec province that I know and love.
Doxinator14 wrote: Mon Apr 14, 2025 3:16 am
And Anthony Bourdain had great cooking shows I still watch them sometimes !
He's my favourite celebrity chef. I loved
Parts Unknown, and his book
Kitchen Confidential too. His untimely death by suicide made me so sad. Cooking is one of my hobbies.
Doxinator14 wrote: Mon Apr 14, 2025 3:16 am
to be honest yeah I'm attracted to the ladies
but when I'm really excited I'm more receptive to like contact in general so

I don't know what that makes me
It really depends! For instance, would you be aroused by same-sex contact? (I tried it once with a close friend while we were both on the
empathogenic/entactogenic drug
MDAI... and I regretted it.

)
At the very least, it does mean that you're most likely what we'd call a
non-exclusive teleiophile, similar to how I'm a non-exclusive
pedohebephile because I can be attracted to a very small but not insignificant number of
autopedophilic adult women with high
neoteny.
Oh, by the way, I created
a thread with a question for AAMs, if you feel like participating.
Re: My introduction
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2025 8:10 pm
by Doxinator14
WavesInEternity wrote: Mon Apr 14, 2025 4:22 am
Doxinator14 wrote: Mon Apr 14, 2025 3:16 am
I'm not in Montreal
That wasn't what I was implying, apologies for being unclear! I just meant that it's a city in the Quebec province that I know and love.
Doxinator14 wrote: Mon Apr 14, 2025 3:16 am
And Anthony Bourdain had great cooking shows I still watch them sometimes !
He's my favourite celebrity chef. I loved
Parts Unknown, and his book
Kitchen Confidential too. His untimely death by suicide made me so sad. Cooking is one of my hobbies.
Doxinator14 wrote: Mon Apr 14, 2025 3:16 am
to be honest yeah I'm attracted to the ladies
but when I'm really excited I'm more receptive to like contact in general so

I don't know what that makes me
It really depends! For instance, would you be aroused by same-sex contact? (I tried it once with a close friend while we were both on the
empathogenic/entactogenic drug
MDAI... and I regretted it.

)
At the very least, it does mean that you're most likely what we'd call a
non-exclusive teleiophile, similar to how I'm a non-exclusive
pedohebephile because I can be attracted to a very small but not insignificant number of
autopedophilic adult women with high
neoteny.
Oh, by the way, I created
a thread with a question for AAMs, if you feel like participating.
Sorry I don't know how to split your message in sections like you have done with mine

I think I could be aroused by same sex contact just definitely not like for a romantic relationship ? I have never really thought about it frl and I have seen your thread yeah ! Thanks for letting me know

Re: My introduction
Posted: Tue Apr 15, 2025 12:59 am
by WavesInEternity
Doxinator14 wrote: Mon Apr 14, 2025 8:10 pm
Sorry I don't know how to split your message in sections like you have done with mine
I actually just explained to another new user how to do it
in this post.
Doxinator14 wrote: Mon Apr 14, 2025 8:10 pm
I think I could be aroused by same sex contact just definitely not like for a romantic relationship ? I have never really thought about it frl and I have seen your thread yeah ! Thanks for letting me know
Interesting. Judging by the way you describe your preferences, you might be somewhat
pansexual but strictly
heteroromantic. What's your score on the
Kinsey Scale? (Mine is 0: strictly heterosexual.)
Re: My introduction
Posted: Tue Apr 15, 2025 4:06 am
by Fragment
Boo for linking a teleionormative quiz.
Potential response for the first question "Both men and women."
Re: My introduction
Posted: Tue Apr 15, 2025 5:25 am
by WavesInEternity
Fragment wrote: Tue Apr 15, 2025 4:06 am
Boo for linking a teleionormative quiz.
Potential response for the first question "Both men and women."
I don't know of any MAP-inclusive version, sorry! In fact, I don't think any mainstream online quiz about sex would be. I just interpret the questions in a MAP-inclusive way, mentally replacing "men" by "boys" and "women" by "girls", or even more generally "males" and "females".