Page 1 of 3

My introduction

Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2025 2:04 am
by Doxinator14
Yo I'm terrible at introductions and I'm from Canada (my English is not very good πŸ˜…) I'm 14, I'm a boy and a LAM (Ladies Attracted Minor 😏 and girls my age but it's mainly physical) I have find this forum today because I was searching on the web of it was like normal to be attracted to adults as a minor or if I was like... Just weird or something. I don't know what other things to say... I like burgers, the colour red, skateboarding, gaming, cars and modding my scooterπŸ›΅ you can talk to me in English ou en franΓ§ais ! I don't know how to end that sorry πŸ˜‚

Re: My introduction

Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2025 2:06 am
by Fragment
Welcome.

Be careful with a username with β€œdox” in it! People might get the wrong idea.

Re: My introduction

Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2025 2:22 am
by Doxinator14
Fragment wrote: Mon Apr 14, 2025 2:06 am Welcome.

Be careful with a username with β€œdox” in it! People might get the wrong idea.
Oups I'm really sorry I have not think about that... I have wanted a mix of my first name and Β« Terminator Β» πŸ˜…

Re: My introduction

Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2025 2:35 am
by WavesInEternity
Welcome! You hail from a rather fascinating place; Montreal is such a great city. I agree with Anthony Bourdain that it's the most interesting city in Canada.

Being attracted to older women at your age is totally normal. In high school, most of my friends were... I was the exception. As a rule of thumb, the age range you're attracted to in early adolescence will stay the age range you'll be attracted to for the rest of your life. So, congratulations, you're a confirmed teleiophile (as the page rightly points out, "legal majority is not prerequisite for teleiophilia"). In other words, you're a very "normal" straight male. At your age, I was obsessed with lolicon and in denial about what it entailed regarding my sexuality. I hoped I'd "grow out of it": after all, the girls in those drawings were similar in age to myself. I never did. I'm still attracted to younger girls, and I still absolutely love lolicon.

Vast evidence demonstrates that boys are more receptive than girls to sexual contact with adults, especially women. So receptive, in fact, that they even counter-intuitively report a positive reaction to coercive sexual contact with adults in nearly half of cases. :shock:

Re: My introduction

Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2025 3:16 am
by Doxinator14
WavesInEternity wrote: Mon Apr 14, 2025 2:35 am Welcome! You hail from a rather fascinating place; Montreal is such a great city. I agree with Anthony Bourdain that it's the most interesting city in Canada.

Being attracted to older women at your age is totally normal. In high school, most of my friends were... I was the exception. As a rule of thumb, the age range you're attracted to in early adolescence will stay the age range you'll be attracted to for the rest of your life. So, congratulations, you're a confirmed teleiophile (as the page rightly points out, "legal majority is not prerequisite for teleiophilia"). In other words, you're a very "normal" straight male. At your age, I was obsessed with lolicon and in denial about what it entailed regarding my sexuality. I hoped I'd "grow out of it": after all, the girls in those drawings were similar in age to myself. I never did. I'm still attracted to younger girls, and I still absolutely love lolicon.

Vast evidence demonstrates that boys are more receptive than girls to sexual contact with adults, especially women. So receptive, in fact, that they even counter-intuitively report a positive reaction to coercive sexual contact with adults in nearly half of cases. :shock:
I'm not in Montreal πŸ˜… And Anthony Bourdain had great cooking shows I still watch them sometimes ! Thank you for the information it's interesting to read 😁 and like to be honest yeah I'm attracted to the ladies but when I'm really excited I'm more receptive to like contact in general so πŸ˜… I don't know what that makes me

Re: My introduction

Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2025 4:22 am
by WavesInEternity
Doxinator14 wrote: Mon Apr 14, 2025 3:16 am I'm not in Montreal πŸ˜…
That wasn't what I was implying, apologies for being unclear! I just meant that it's a city in the Quebec province that I know and love.
Doxinator14 wrote: Mon Apr 14, 2025 3:16 am And Anthony Bourdain had great cooking shows I still watch them sometimes !
He's my favourite celebrity chef. I loved Parts Unknown, and his book Kitchen Confidential too. His untimely death by suicide made me so sad. Cooking is one of my hobbies. :)
Doxinator14 wrote: Mon Apr 14, 2025 3:16 am to be honest yeah I'm attracted to the ladies but when I'm really excited I'm more receptive to like contact in general so πŸ˜… I don't know what that makes me
It really depends! For instance, would you be aroused by same-sex contact? (I tried it once with a close friend while we were both on the empathogenic/entactogenic drug MDAI... and I regretted it. πŸ˜…)

At the very least, it does mean that you're most likely what we'd call a non-exclusive teleiophile, similar to how I'm a non-exclusive pedohebephile because I can be attracted to a very small but not insignificant number of autopedophilic adult women with high neoteny.

Oh, by the way, I created a thread with a question for AAMs, if you feel like participating.

Re: My introduction

Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2025 8:10 pm
by Doxinator14
WavesInEternity wrote: Mon Apr 14, 2025 4:22 am
Doxinator14 wrote: Mon Apr 14, 2025 3:16 am I'm not in Montreal πŸ˜…
That wasn't what I was implying, apologies for being unclear! I just meant that it's a city in the Quebec province that I know and love.
Doxinator14 wrote: Mon Apr 14, 2025 3:16 am And Anthony Bourdain had great cooking shows I still watch them sometimes !
He's my favourite celebrity chef. I loved Parts Unknown, and his book Kitchen Confidential too. His untimely death by suicide made me so sad. Cooking is one of my hobbies. :)
Doxinator14 wrote: Mon Apr 14, 2025 3:16 am to be honest yeah I'm attracted to the ladies but when I'm really excited I'm more receptive to like contact in general so πŸ˜… I don't know what that makes me
It really depends! For instance, would you be aroused by same-sex contact? (I tried it once with a close friend while we were both on the empathogenic/entactogenic drug MDAI... and I regretted it. πŸ˜…)

At the very least, it does mean that you're most likely what we'd call a non-exclusive teleiophile, similar to how I'm a non-exclusive pedohebephile because I can be attracted to a very small but not insignificant number of autopedophilic adult women with high neoteny.

Oh, by the way, I created a thread with a question for AAMs, if you feel like participating.
Sorry I don't know how to split your message in sections like you have done with mine πŸ˜… I think I could be aroused by same sex contact just definitely not like for a romantic relationship ? I have never really thought about it frl and I have seen your thread yeah ! Thanks for letting me know 😁

Re: My introduction

Posted: Tue Apr 15, 2025 12:59 am
by WavesInEternity
Doxinator14 wrote: Mon Apr 14, 2025 8:10 pm Sorry I don't know how to split your message in sections like you have done with mine πŸ˜…
I actually just explained to another new user how to do it in this post.
Doxinator14 wrote: Mon Apr 14, 2025 8:10 pm I think I could be aroused by same sex contact just definitely not like for a romantic relationship ? I have never really thought about it frl and I have seen your thread yeah ! Thanks for letting me know 😁
Interesting. Judging by the way you describe your preferences, you might be somewhat pansexual but strictly heteroromantic. What's your score on the Kinsey Scale? (Mine is 0: strictly heterosexual.)

Re: My introduction

Posted: Tue Apr 15, 2025 4:06 am
by Fragment
Boo for linking a teleionormative quiz.

Potential response for the first question "Both men and women."

Re: My introduction

Posted: Tue Apr 15, 2025 5:25 am
by WavesInEternity
Fragment wrote: Tue Apr 15, 2025 4:06 am Boo for linking a teleionormative quiz.

Potential response for the first question "Both men and women."
I don't know of any MAP-inclusive version, sorry! In fact, I don't think any mainstream online quiz about sex would be. I just interpret the questions in a MAP-inclusive way, mentally replacing "men" by "boys" and "women" by "girls", or even more generally "males" and "females".