Page 1 of 1

Huw Edwards admits child abuse image charges

Posted: Fri Aug 09, 2024 7:16 pm
by Artaxerxes II
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cmj260e54x7o:
Huw Edwards, once the BBC's most senior news presenter, has pleaded guilty to three counts of making indecent images of children.
He admitted having 41 indecent images of children, which had been sent to him by another man on WhatsApp, Westminster Magistrates' Court heard.
They included seven category A images, the most serious classification - two of which showed a child aged between about seven and nine.
Police later revealed the man who sent the images to Edwards was a convicted paedophile.
Until last year, Edwards was one of the main presenters on BBC One's News at Ten and often fronted coverage of major national events.

The BBC said it was "shocked" and he would have been sacked if he had been charged before he left the corporation in April.
"There can be no place for such abhorrent behaviour and our thoughts are with all those affected," it added.
The BBC also said it had been "made aware in confidence that he had been arrested on suspicion of serious offences and released on bail" last November.
Edwards had already been suspended in relation to different allegations but remained employed on full pay until he left on "medical advice" three months ago.
He was charged last month and could now face a jail sentence. He will next appear in court on 16 September.

Edwards was flanked by police officers and surrounded by photographers as he entered and left the court on Wednesday.
He was expressionless outside court and inside the hearing, which lasted for less than half an hour.
As the charges were read to him, he replied "guilty" three times, quietly and calmly.
The court heard he had been involved in online chat on WhatsApp from December 2020 with an adult man, who sent him 377 sexual images, of which 41 were indecent images of children.
Under the law, images can mean both video clips and still pictures. The Crown Prosecution Service said most of the category A images were estimated to show children aged between 13 and 15. Two clips showed a child aged about seven to nine.
Category A images show serious abuse including penetrative sexual activity.
He also had 12 category B pictures, which involve non-penetrative sexual activity, and 22 photographs in category C, which covers other indecent images. The category B and C pictures showed children aged between 12 to 15.
After the hearing, police said officers started investigating Edwards after seizing a phone as part of an unrelated probe, which revealed his participation in a WhatsApp conversation.
The Metropolitan Police said a 25-year-old paedophile called Alex Williams, who was sentenced to a suspended 12-month jail sentence at Merthyr Tydfil Crown Court in Wales on 15 March, had shared indecent images of children with Edwards.

The court was earlier told that, on 2 February 2021, the other man asked whether what he was sending was too young, to which Edwards asked him not to send any underage images.
The final indecent image was sent in August 2021 - a category A film featuring a young boy.
The man told Edwards the boy was quite young looking, and that he had more images which were illegal, the court was told.
Edwards told him not to send any illegal images.
No more were sent, and the pair continued to exchange legal pornographic images until April 2022.
Edwards's barrister Philip Evans KC told the court: "There’s no suggestion in this case that Mr Edwards has... in the traditional sense of the word, created any image of any sort."
He added that Edwards "did not keep any images, did not send any to anyone else and did not and has not sought similar images from anywhere else".
Mr Evans also said the former broadcaster had experienced "both mental and physical" health issues.
The barrister told the court his client "was not just of good character, but of exceptional character".
Edwards has not been on air since last July following high-profile reports in the Sun newspaper claiming he paid a young person for sexually explicit images.
The Metropolitan Police said they found no evidence of criminal behaviour in relation to those allegations, and that the current case was separate.
"These allegations did not form part of the matter which was considered by police in July 2023. They were investigated separately as a standalone case," a police spokesperson said.

Edwards was suspended by the BBC last July and executives began an internal investigation, which has not revealed its conclusions. He resigned in April.
Edwards received between £475,000-£479,999 between April 2023 and April 2024, an increase of £40,000 on the previous year.

'Making' indecent images - what does the law say?

Edwards pleaded guilty to three charges of making indecent photographs of a child. In the law, a photograph can also mean video footage.
"Making" indecent images can have a wide legal definition, and covers more than simply taking or filming the original picture or clip.
The Crown Prosecution Service says, external it can include opening an email attachment containing an image; downloading an image from a website to a screen; storing an image on a computer; accessing a pornographic website in which an images appears in an automatic "pop-up" window; receiving an image via social media, even if unsolicited and even if part of a group; or live-streaming images of children.
A court must also decide whether an offence falls into the category of possession, distribution or production.
According to the Sentencing Council, external, creating the original image counts as production - the more serious of the three categories. It adds that "making an image by simple downloading should be treated as possession for the purposes of sentencing".
In such cases, sentences can range from six months to three years in prison. However, a community order with a sex offender treatment programme requirement can be an alternative to jail time "where there is a sufficient prospect of rehabilitation".

'Long-lasting trauma'

In a statement after Wednesday's hearing, Claire Brinton of the CPS said: "Accessing indecent images of underage people perpetuates the sexual exploitation of children, which has deep, long-lasting trauma on these victims.
"The CPS and the Metropolitan Police were able to prove that Edwards was receiving illegal material involving children via WhatsApp."
Children's charity the NSPCC said: "Online child sexual abuse offences can have a devastating impact on victims and we should be in no doubt about the seriousness of Edwards' crimes."
The Internet Watch Foundation (IWF) also said: "This is criminal material, including images depicting the most extreme category of sexual abuse, which have real and lasting effects on victims."
Also related, Huw Edwards has his highest honour in Wales stripped from him, and the BBC is now demanding that he repays his entire salary to them:

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/hu ... r-AA1ovN8V

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/world/bb ... r-AA1owd4y

Re: Huw Edwards admits child abuse image charges

Posted: Fri Aug 09, 2024 9:45 pm
by PorcelainLark
What a farce.

Re: Huw Edwards admits child abuse image charges

Posted: Sat Aug 10, 2024 4:30 am
by Fragment
We have an article coming out on this soon.

Re: Huw Edwards admits child abuse image charges

Posted: Sun Aug 11, 2024 3:14 pm
by BLueRibbon
Fragment wrote: Sat Aug 10, 2024 4:30 am We have an article coming out on this soon.
The rough draft is done!

Re: Huw Edwards admits child abuse image charges

Posted: Sun Aug 11, 2024 5:40 pm
by Artaxerxes II
UPDATE: The identity of the person who sent PIMs to Huw has been revealed.

https://metro.co.uk/2024/08/01/paedophi ... s_news_top
Paedophile who sent Huw Edwards child abuse images revealed

A picture of the man who sent indecent images of children to ex-BBC presenter Huw Edwards has been revealed for the first time.

The Metropolitan Police confirmed yesterday that the 25-year-old convicted paedophile was named Alex Williams.

An image of him has now been shared for the first time.

The Met Police said Williams, of Merthyr Tydfil, south Wales, pleaded guilty to possessing and distributing category A, B and C images as well as possessing prohibited images of children.

Williams was convicted of seven offences – receiving a 12-month suspended sentence on March 15.

The images Williams shared with Edwards on WhatsApp came to light during an unrelated investigation by South Wales Police.

According to MailOnline, Williams has ‘gone into hiding’, with his parents confirming to the publication that he no longer lives with them.

They also denied having knowledge that he was a sex offender, and claimed to be unaware that he was convicted of child pornography offences earlier this year.

His parents claimed to now have seen him for three or four months, though the publication claims neighbours said they saw him in the street within the last few weeks.

His mother also claimed to have no knowledge of a connection between Edwards and Williams.

Former BBC presenter Edwards’ – was previously the BBC’s highest-paid newsreader – case was then passed to the Metropolitan Police, who arrested the veteran TV presenter in November last year, and charged him in June.

On Wednesday, Edwards admitted three charges of ‘making’ indecent photographs after receiving the images from Williams.

He committed the three offences between December 2020 and April 2021.

Westminster Magistrates’ Court was told seven of the indecent images shared with the veteran broadcaster by Williams were of the most serious type.

The final indecent image was sent in August 2021, a category A film featuring a young boy, with the convicted paedophile telling the newsreader the child was ‘quite young looking’ and that he had more images which were illegal.

Edwards told him not to send any illegal images, the court was told.

No more were sent, and the pair continued to exchange legal pornographic images until April 2022.

Speaking in Edwards’ defence, his barrister Philip Evans KC said in court on Wednesday: ‘There’s no suggestion in this case that Mr Edwards has… in the traditional sense of the word, created any image of any sort.

‘It is important also to remember for context that devices, Mr Edwards’ devices, have been seized, have been searched, and there’s nothing in those devices.

‘It is only the images that are the subject of the charges that came via a WhatsApp chat.

‘Mr Edwards did not keep any images, did not send any to anyone else and did not and has not sought similar images from anywhere else.’

Mr Evans KC also said the broadcaster had ‘both mental and physical’ health issues.

He told the court: ‘It is obvious to the court, I’m sure, that Mr Edwards was not just of good character, but of exceptional character.’

Mr Evans said the court was aware of issues with Edwards’ health – ‘both mental and physical’.

Prosecuting Ian Hope told the court that a suspended sentence might be considered for Edwards.

Setting out the potential penalties under the law, he said that where there is the prospect of rehabilitation a community order and sexual offender treatment programme could be considered as alternatives to a custodial sentence.

Re: Huw Edwards admits child abuse image charges

Posted: Sun Aug 11, 2024 11:07 pm
by PorcelainLark
Setting out the potential penalties under the law, he said that where there is the prospect of rehabilitation a community order and sexual offender treatment programme could be considered as alternatives to a custodial sentence.
Maybe I've misunderstood everything, but rehabilitated for what? Treated for what? If you fell asleep in a public place and someone took off your clothes, would you be engaging in problematic behavior (public indecency)? The whole point of rehabilitation or treatment is predicated on sexual offenses being intentional; you can't rehabilitate someone from a crime they don't intend. Another argument: if someone ends up running a red light because they've had a stroke, is it appropriate to think of that as "reckless driving"?
It looks like this is one of those places where the law fails to serve it's intended function.

Re: Huw Edwards admits child abuse image charges

Posted: Mon Aug 12, 2024 5:11 am
by Fragment
I noticed the exact same thing.

I hope him being rich, high profile and having a good lawyer could result in a good outcome. This case will become precedent for future cases, after all. That's one reason that I hope more rich, successful people get arrested for offences like these. To shape precedent.

Re: Huw Edwards admits child abuse image charges

Posted: Mon Aug 12, 2024 1:07 pm
by BLueRibbon
Huw Edwards' lawyer should have cited Atkins v DPP (2001). Had he done this, he could have won. So why did he plead guilty? Did he just want it over with?

Being wrongly convicted of making indecent images of children is a poor person problem.