Sending the third consignment (covering sub-title sections 11 to 19 out of a total of 81) of my paper titled; PEDOPHILIA CRIMINAL OFFENCE BUILT ON MORALLY BANKRUPT WESTERN PSEDOSCEINCES.
Many members of this forum may not have visited my website https://anticorruptionfight.blogspot.com/ . By sharing the paper here, I hope to ensure that everyone can access and read it directly through this forum.
Another key reason for sharing it here is to preserve the full text of my work in case the blog is ever taken down for any reason.
********************************************
11. EXPOSING THE PARADOXES OF MODERN PEDOPHILIA CRIME DEFINITIONS
This interpretation may unsettle staunch Western medical and legal advocates who view pedophilia as an inherently harmful and heinous crime, though causing offense is not my aim. The purpose here is to dismantle the modern pedophilia fallacy by demonstrating that our ancestors lived healthy, normal and moral lives within their societal norms. Our forefathers and mothers normally engaged in loving, consensual sexual relationships, fostering strong community bonds. Far from neglecting their children, they likely devoted more time than we do today to nurturing them—teaching essential life skills, moral values, and the distinctions between right and wrong, good and evil—preparing them for survival and flourishing. Yet, modern medical and legal authorities judgements condemns these widely accepted customs as a heinous child rape, insulting the foundational inherent sexual practices of humanity. When confronted with this contradiction, these authorities often resort to cherry-picking rare historical anecdotes, claiming that girls in ancient times typically married in late in life. This revisionism seeks to align ancestral behavior with modern sensibilities, propping up the narrative that our forebears shared today’s aversion to adolescent-adult sexual relations. Such selective storytelling distorts history. It is contrary to the historical reality and fact which shows, even as late as 19th century in Europe women who were not married before the age of 18 were considered and unmarriageable labelling them as spinsters. Nevertheless, the present western narrative of women’s “Age of Consent” at 18, were constructed basically fit a flawed, present-day pedophilia crime paradigm, ignoring the broader context of healthy, natural human development across millennia.
III. Incest In Animals’ Evolution
12. TERRITORIAL LOGIC OF INCEST EVOLUTION
The evolutionary history of species reveals that most land-bound animals are inherently territorial—a survival strategy shaped by geological constraints. Unlike birds, which can freely traverse vast distances, terrestrial animals face formidable barriers: rivers, mountains, deserts, and dense forests restrict their movement, while competition for limited resources like food, water, and shelter further confines them to fixed ranges. These geographical and ecological pressures force animals to establish and defend territories, as venturing beyond familiar grounds risks starvation, predation, or fatal clashes with rival groups. Consequently, their reproductive behaviors adapt to these limitations. This relentless pressure has sculpted their instincts, embedding a fierce drive to claim and protect their domains. Even their mating rituals bow to these constraints, ensuring survival hinges on mastering the art of territorial defence—a testament to nature’s brutal yet ingenious design.
13. INCEST AS CALCULATED STRATEGY IN MAMMALS TO AVOID RISKS OF WANDERING
In mammalian evolution, territorial dynamics shape reproductive strategies, particularly among social species. Dominant males, often fathers, expel their sexually mature sons from the pack to eliminate competition, forcing these young males into a nomadic existence. In contrast, females—daughters, sisters, mothers—remain safely within the group, protected for life. This stability ensures their survival and the continued propagation of their genes. Meanwhile, the ousted sons linger near the borders of their natal territory for many important reasons. First, they are familiar with its landscape, available resources, and pride members so they avoid venturing too far. Straying into neighboring territories risks lethal confrontations, severe injury, or death at the hands of rival groups. Staying close, therefore, is a strategic choice, as they bide their time for an opportunity to reclaim power.
14. THE PERILS OF EXILE: SURVIVAL AND STRATEGY
As the dominant male ages, weakened by battles and time, these nomadic sons—now stronger, skilled, and confident—sense their chance. Seizing the moment, they often succeed in overthrowing their father, driving him out and claiming the territory. To secure their lineage, they kill the young offspring of the old male and mate with the remaining females, including their own mothers, sisters, aunts, or even grandmothers, as female reproductive age spans generations. This inbreeding becomes standard, reinforced by the new dominant male’s possessive control over mating rights. Unlike food or land, which he might share, he guards his mates fiercely, ensuring most offspring carry his bloodline, including intercede to make it strong.. Consequently, genetic diversity diminishes, concentrating within a single male’s lineage. Across social and solitary animal species alike, dominant males and females monopolize reproduction, anchoring genetic heritage to a narrow bloodline. In this evolutionary logic, inbreeding persists as a byproduct of power, territoriality, and survival.
15. CHIMPANZEES AGE OF SEXUAL MATURITY AND MATING
Before delving into the subject of incest or inbreeding in humans, let us first study it in our closest animal relatives, primates and their mating behaviours. Apes are humans’ closest animal relatives, with chimpanzees sharing approximately 98% of human DNA. In captivity, they can live for around 50 years, or even longer with proper healthcare. Their biological and behavioural similarities to humans extend to various aspects of life, including sexual development and mating patterns. Chimpanzees’ females typically reach sexual maturity between 7 and 10 years of age, (around same as humans) with actual mating beginning between 10 and 12 years old. Studying their natural development offers key insights into the biological basis of sexual behavior, independent of human cultural influences. Understanding the natural onset of sexual relations in primates is crucial for research on human sexual development, yet modern discourse often stigmatizes this subject under the controversial label of pedophilia. Cultural taboos, guilt, and moral judgments frequently overshadow objective inquiry, making it difficult to explore early-age sexuality through a scientific lens. By examining primates like chimpanzees, and their mating behaviours under the principles of Game Theory, we can gain valuable insights into the biological timelines of sexual maturity, allowing for research that is driven by empirical evidence rather than societal bias.
16. THE STUDIES OF INBREEDING IN CHIMPANZEES
Chimpanzee societies provide compelling evidence that inbreeding arises from their highly territorial, xenophobic nature pressures and the mating scarcity, much like in other mammals. Field studies document that chimpanzee communities with territorial males engaging in lethal aggression against outsiders to defend resources and mating access (Goodall, 1986; Wilson et al., 2014). Young males will be driven out and banished from the group if they don’t submit to the alpha male or attempt to mount with the females in the groups. This subordinated fear migrating into neighbouring groups , which could results in death. Therefore, the younger males will remain submissive, wait until they have developed enough strength and other social skill such as coalition to overthrow the dominant male and become the new Alfa. There are instances that they committing infanticide to eliminate rivals’ males offsprings before mating with resident females, including mothers and sisters (Pusey, 1980; Watts, 2018).
Despite these observations, the role of inbreeding in chimpanzee evolution has been downplayed, arguably due to human moral prejudices and biases. Research confirms that when outside mating opportunities are scarce, even female chimpanzees exhibit reduced aversion to kin, particularly in isolated communities (Walker et al., 2017). Genetic studies of wild populations reveal higher-than-expected relatedness among offspring of dominant males (Vigilant et al., 2001), suggesting that inbreeding is not accidental but a tolerated consequence of male reproductive monopolization. This aligns with cross-species data showing that when dispersal is lethal and females are limited, incest avoidance mechanisms (e.g., juvenile dispersal or sexual disinterest) are overridden by necessity (Pusey & Wolf, 1996). The reluctance to foreground these findings in primatology underscores how taboo distorts scientific narratives—even when the evidence points to inbreeding as an adaptive response to ecological and territorial constraints.
17. EMALE CHIMPANZEES’ DISPERSAL BASICALLY CONTRADICTS THE TERRITORIAL NATURE OF CHIMPANZEES
The researchers who study chimpanzee mating behavior, often frame female dispersal as the general mechanism to avoid inbreeding, but this interpretation appears heavily skewed. Their conclusions seem less rooted in objective science and more in an effort to align findings with Western societal moral taboos against incest. Rather than conducting an impartial, evidence-based analysis, they assert that sexually mature female chimps voluntarily leave their natal groups to prevent mating with relatives. This claim hinges on an unproven assumption: that female chimps possess an innate awareness of the genetic risks of inbreeding, such as abnormalities in offspring. This anthropomorphic leap undermines the integrity of scientific literature on animal mating behavior, sidestepping foundational principles of game theory—rationality, interdependence, payoffs, and equilibrium—that should guide such studies.
In reality, the territorial nature of chimpanzees challenges this narrative. A separate study examining group composition and genetic relatedness reveals that 70 to 80% of males and females within a group are genetically linked. This high degree of relatedness directly contradicts the female dispersal and inbreeding avoidance theory. If females were indeed leaving to avoid inbreeding, such genetic proximity would be unlikely. Furthermore, it is a well-known fact that dominant males engage in infanticide, killing the offspring within their group if they detect the offspring is not their own. All these evidences suggests that chimps prioritize genetic and territorial cohesion over dispersal, exposing the flaws in a theory that seems more tailored to human moral prejudices than to the observable realities of chimpanzee behavior. True scientific inquiry demands we discard these biases and confront the data as it stands.
18. FEMALE DISPERSAL VALID ONLY IN FRINGE MINORITY CASES
However the female dispersal in chimpanzees probably occur in specific circumstances, but it is far from a general rule. In groups with a high male-to-female ratio, wandering females from neighboring groups who have been marginalized in their natal groups due to an excess of females with limited reproductive opportunities and lack of kinship, may seek entry. Thus, Discrimination in their original group perhaps the main reason prompting their departure. In the new group, resident females may reluctantly accept them, largely because the majority of males stand in favor of the newcomers for novel mating prospects. Sexual attraction studies support this dynamic: individuals raised together, such as siblings or close kin, often develop sexual indifference, while the arrival of unfamiliar males or females can spark attraction. This natural mechanism boosts genetic diversity, acting as an evolutionary safeguard against excessive inbreeding.
Yet, these immigrant females and their offspring probably do not achieve equal status. The dominant resident females and males often treat them as second-class members, and their offspring inherit this disadvantage. Lacking strong kinship ties, these descendants are more prone to disperse again upon reaching sexual maturity, perpetuating a cycle of migration. While this fringe minority pattern validates female dispersal in limited cases, the broader territorial and xenophobic tendencies of chimpanzee groups undermine its general applicability. Game theory principles, centered on species survival, do not support widespread dispersal for inbreeding avoidance. Moreover, no substantial research shows that most offspring from inbreeding suffer genetic abnormalities. Instead, female dispersal more likely stems from attraction to new mating partners than from a deliberate strategy to prevent inbreeding. Thus, the theory holds true only in exceptional contexts, not as a fundamental rule.
19. INBREEDING AS A REPRODUCTIVE IMPERATIVE IN RESOURCE-SCARCE ENVIRONMENTS
When viable mating partners become scarce and reproductive opportunities dwindle due to their territorial nature, biological necessity inevitably overrides preference. Moreover, the female mammals experience extended periods of sexual inactivity during gestation and lactation, creating severe limitations on male reproductive access. In these constrained circumstances, dominant males face an evolutionary ultimatum: either adapt their mating strategies or risk genetic oblivion. Waiting indefinitely for novel females to appear is not an evolutionarily stable strategy—each missed reproductive cycle represents a potential dead-end for the male's genetic lineage.
This harsh biological arithmetic forces dominant males to resort to inbreeding with close female relatives—mothers, sisters, or daughters, nieces—not by preference but by reproductive necessity. Far from being maladaptive, this strategy ensures the continuation of the male's genetic legacy when alternative options are unavailable. The imperative to reproduce outweighs theoretical concerns about genetic diversity, particularly when immediate survival of the bloodline is at stake. In such scenarios, inbreeding emerges not as a deviation but as an evolutionarily rational response to environmental constraints, a calculated trade-off, where a guaranteed genetic transmission trumps optimal genetic variation. This phenomenon underscores a fundamental principle of behavioural ecology: when resources are critically limited, organisms default to the most reliable survival strategies, even if they appear suboptimal under ideal conditions.