MAP Forum

If there are groups like NAMBLA for Boy Lovers why isn't there a group for Girl Lovers?

I think because most people know heterosexual male hebephilia is normal (even if they outwardly act like it isn't), while heterosexual male pedophilia is actually quite rare. Too many people fall into the former and too few fall into the latter to have warranted any organization.

PorcelainLark wrote: Sun Aug 18, 2024 10:28 am I think because most people know heterosexual male hebephilia is normal (even if they outwardly act like it isn't), while heterosexual male pedophilia is actually quite rare. Too many people fall into the former and too few fall into the latter to have warranted any organization.

Exclusive pedophilia is rare but non-exclusive pedophilia is actually very common.

mrlolicon93 wrote: Sun Aug 18, 2024 2:20 am If there are groups like NAMBLA for Boy Lovers why isn't there a group for Girl Lovers?

The following are just thoughts, not based on any data.

More social stigma attached to loving girls than to loving boys. Mothers more protective of girls. Girls likely to reflect more negatively on past sexual experiences. Odds stacked against a favourable reception to public demonstrations of girl-love activism. Boy love has acceptance and pedigree historically; few girl love precedents historically.

Perhaps girl lovers witnessed the ridicule and bad press heaped upon NAMBLA over recent decades, and decided not to go down the same path.

Re joining forces, boy lovers and girl lovers tend to be mutually exclusive communities online, and are often disparaging in such places about one another.

mrlolicon93 wrote: Sun Aug 18, 2024 10:53 am

PorcelainLark wrote: Sun Aug 18, 2024 10:28 am I think because most people know heterosexual male hebephilia is normal (even if they outwardly act like it isn't), while heterosexual male pedophilia is actually quite rare. Too many people fall into the former and too few fall into the latter to have warranted any organization.

Exclusive pedophilia is rare but non-exclusive pedophilia is actually very common.

Source?

PorcelainLark wrote: Sun Aug 18, 2024 5:45 pm

mrlolicon93 wrote: Sun Aug 18, 2024 10:53 am

PorcelainLark wrote: Sun Aug 18, 2024 10:28 am I think because most people know heterosexual male hebephilia is normal (even if they outwardly act like it isn't), while heterosexual male pedophilia is actually quite rare. Too many people fall into the former and too few fall into the latter to have warranted any organization.

Exclusive pedophilia is rare but non-exclusive pedophilia is actually very common.

Source?

Its kinda just common sense.

Plus most of the others i have met over the years are all non-exclusive like myself.

I have only met a small handful of exclusive pedophiles in my life.

Strato wrote: Sun Aug 18, 2024 3:16 pm

mrlolicon93 wrote: Sun Aug 18, 2024 2:20 am If there are groups like NAMBLA for Boy Lovers why isn't there a group for Girl Lovers?

The following are just thoughts, not based on any data.

More social stigma attached to loving girls than to loving boys. Mothers more protective of girls. Girls likely to reflect more negatively on past sexual experiences. Odds stacked against a favourable reception to public demonstrations of girl-love activism. Boy love has acceptance and pedigree historically; few girl love precedents historically.

Perhaps girl lovers witnessed the ridicule and bad press heaped upon NAMBLA over recent decades, and decided not to go down the same path.

Re joining forces, boy lovers and girl lovers tend to be mutually exclusive communities online, and are often disparaging in such places about one another.

I would add that NAMBLA and gay rights organizations met in real life and had high public visibility back in the day – there was no internet to anonymise activists and dilute activism. Plus, there were no online on-topic resources such as now exist on the dark web, to assuage pent up paedophile angst.

Just checked the activity stats for a boy love website, which are available for all to see on the banner page without logging on, in case anyone asks: total posts 162214, total topics 10190, total members 164302. That website has been going for under a year, yet it is clearly incredibly well patronized and vibrant. I am sure an equivalent girl love website attracts similar huge demand. I doubt even Mu would approach a fraction of that activity within a similar time frame.

So why would the average paedosexual risk public humiliation when he or she can so easily turn to the internet for much of what is desired … given the absence of the real thing?

What clear net BL site has those kind of numbers? I'm not familiar with any.

Jim Burton wrote: Mon Aug 19, 2024 10:22 am What clear net BL site has those kind of numbers? I'm not familiar with any.

None that I am aware of ...

Strato wrote: Mon Aug 19, 2024 5:17 pm

Jim Burton wrote: Mon Aug 19, 2024 10:22 am What clear net BL site has those kind of numbers? I'm not familiar with any.

None that I am aware of ...

And before anyone here accuses me of having disobeyed forum rules 1 and 2, I have not.

I am just pointing out that social networking has changed the way people think and behave. The ready availability of online girl love and boy love resources (given the above statistics) evidently provides much of what a minor-attracted person desires in the absence of the real thing. What is the point, they may say, of indulging in activism and the high risk of retribution that likely accompanies it, when my on-topic community, where I am made to feel so much at home, is right here at the click of a mouse.