MAP Forum

Are videos of people fucking child sex dolls legal? What about photos of sex? What about non sexual but naked photos of anatomically correct child sex dolls? Is it legal to view online, post, produce, etc?

Also, if it is fully legal, then why dont we just make porn of sex dolls instead of real kids? The dolls are extremely realistic and wont get you in legal trouble if they are legal, so why isnt there a section on pornhub of people fucking anatomically correct realistic child sex dolls?

And if it is illegal, what is the sentence, is it a fine or jail time, if so for how long?

What counts as a sex doll? If it is anatomically correct(vulva or penis) but it doesnt have a hole, is it techinically a sex doll?

I am trying to find the answers online but cant really find anything

You'd have to look up the law in your own country. Don't stop there though, make sure you look into case law as well— since so much legislation is vague, it can sometimes be impossible to tell how it can be applied until the courts start making rulings on it.

I expect if kodacon is illegal in your country, then porn of sex dolls is also illegal.

It depends on your country's definition of CP, in some countries the definition of CP is based on the realism of the image or video and as long as it cannot be classified as "realistic" it would be legal.

I recommend you to read the sex crimes section of your local criminal code for a deeper research

I believe that none of the above matters. If an officer/judge wants it to be illegal, they can MAKE it illegal.
Anything goes when it comes to condemning pedos. Especially when laws on this are so vague, and intentionally so.

I would first question the sanity of filming yourself having sex with a doll.

It's illegal in Russia

In the United States at least, states that are adopting anti child-like sex doll laws are also updating their definition of child pornography to include the "victim" also including child-like dolls.

Aspire6 wrote: Thu Sep 25, 2025 7:12 pm In the United States at least, states that are adopting anti child-like sex doll laws are also updating their definition of child pornography to include the "victim" also including child-like dolls.

So basically what they are saying is that you are better of straight up jorking it to real child porn with real children instead of trying to find any alternative since it will be illegal either way. are they not meeting their prison quotas or something?? these people have nothing better to do then destroy peoples lives and lock them away over SILICONE DOLLS. If they weren riding the waves of pedophysteria people would be able to see them for the USELESS low lives they are. God forbid we pass laws on getting people fed and housed, no, the sex dolls are WAAAAAAYYY more important. Once this whole hysteria blows over I cant WAIT for the comedy pieces that will be made over our time period. “American citizens from the 20s were locked in prison over anime girls and sex dolls, to save the children of course”.

G@yWad69 wrote: Thu Sep 25, 2025 9:37 pm these people have nothing better to do then destroy peoples lives and lock them away over SILICONE DOLLS. If they weren riding the waves of pedophysteria people would be able to see them for the USELESS low lives they are. God forbid we pass laws on getting people fed and housed, no, the sex dolls are WAAAAAAYYY more important.

A new excuse for why these dolls are "bad" I've seen regurgitated by others is "when a child is victimized by a pedophile, that victimization continues with a child-like doll, as if the abuse never stops". So its a new "revictimization" excuse like you see with child pornography too.

How long until they make it so being known as a MAP means you have criminal, "revictimizing", thoughts about minors?