Page 1 of 1

Question about “rebillious” teenagers

Posted: Mon Oct 13, 2025 7:02 pm
by G@yWad69
We are made to believe that teenage/adolecent rebillion is a natural and intrinisc part of life that will happen no matter the culture/society/historical context, and that no matter what, teenagers/adolecents will always rebel due to “brain devlopment” or whatever. Teenagers staying out late, not doing their homework and partying, having sex, and doing drugs will happen because they are “rebelling” due to “brain development”. My question is this, if we want them to be obedient and well behaved and not do drugs or have sex or party or stay out late, why dont we make the rules “teenagers should have sex and party and stay out late” so that this totally natural and non socieogenic teenage “rebllion” will happen and the teenagers will “rebel” by doing their homework and staying abstinent and sober? Because antis will say that the only reason teens have sex and do drugs is because theyre brains are hardwired to be naturally rebellious to anything adults say. So what if, we not only let teens have sex and party and drink and smoke weed, but we actively encourage them too? Then the teenagers will rebel by doing their homework and abiding by curfews and staying sober virgins to rebel against adults. Seriously, thats such an easy solution. The teens get to rebel against adult status quo, and the adults well behaved children.

If we want teens to stop having sex, then abolish the age of consent and encourage teens to have as much sex as possible and they will rebel by staying abstinent virgins.

If we want teens to stop drinking, abolish the drinking age and encourage teens to drink and they will rebel by staying sober.

If we want teens to stop staying out late, abolish the curfew and tell them you dont mind them staying out late and they will rebel by going to bed at 8 pm.

Since teenagers are naturally reblious due to their “brain development” then it is completely retarted to enforce rules like yhe age of consent or the drinling age and then get mad when they rebel by having sex or drinking. The smart thing to do would to be abolish these rules and encourage teens to have sex and drink and shit and they will rebel by not doing it. Even with “grooming”. Teens will rebel to whatever adults say right? So just encourage teens to date adult men and they will rebel by refusing to date adults. Unless antis…WANT teenagers to be groomed/drink/have sex????

Re: Question about “rebillious” teenagers

Posted: Mon Oct 13, 2025 7:26 pm
by G@yWad69
Also also. If teenagers are naturally rebellious, but pedophiles have magical mind control powers(grooming) that can magically turn of a teenagers “brain devlopment rebllion” and make teenagers blind slaves to the will of adults, why dont antis just use pedophiles to groom teenagers into doing their homework and staying abstinent and staying sober and cleaning their rooms? We could have mass grooming camps where supervised sex offenders visit juvies and groom all the kids into obeying the law and doing their chores and getting good grades. Your teenager wont stop partying and drinking? Just get a pedo to groom them into staying at home and avoiding alcohol. Your teenager wont stop having sex and sneaking out, just get a pedo to groom them into staying inside and not having sex. Apperantly pedos can even groom adults as well, so just hire pedos at alcohol addiction camps to groom everyone into being sober, hire pedos to groom adults into working out and exercising. I myself use my magical pedo grooming powers to groom starbucks employees into giving me free pink drinks and I groomed my landlord into lowering my rent to 20 dollars per month. I dont even have to pay for groceries, I just groom everyone in the store into paying for all my groceries.

Re: Question about “rebillious” teenagers

Posted: Mon Oct 13, 2025 9:15 pm
by Not Forever
Anyway, I find it funny that as soon as a teenager shows a bit of independence and speaks their mind, they're labeled as going through a "rebellious phase". I guess it makes sense if that label comes from people who think teenagers aren’t capable of giving consent.
If I think about it, it's kind of like minors are seen as animals—or worse, as less than animals.