Page 1 of 1

"PEDO BEARS ARE GO!": 2,000 paedophiles to be let out of prison early

Posted: Sun Oct 19, 2025 6:24 pm
by Jim Burton
The jails can't cope!

https://www.express.co.uk/news/politics ... s-children
About 2,000 paedophiles will be let out of prison early every year under Labour’s controversial sentencing reforms. Child sex abusers locked up for “some of the worst possible offences” could be let out after spending just a third of their jail term behind bars, according to research seen by the Sunday Express.

This is because only the most “serious” offenders will be forced to spend half of their sentence in prison, a cut from the current 67%. This list includes those convicted of rape and assault by penetration. But perverts caught making, distributing or publishing child sex abuse images and fiends jailed for sexual activity with a child could spend just a third of their sentence in jail.

Re: "PEDO BEARS ARE GO!": 2,000 paedophiles to be let out of prison early

Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2025 2:46 pm
by Not Forever
“All the victims of child sexual abuse I have ever spoken to want these vile criminals to spend more time in prison than they do at present. Not less.”
And my sister thinks people who rear-end her deserve the death penalty...

Re: "PEDO BEARS ARE GO!": 2,000 paedophiles to be let out of prison early

Posted: Tue Oct 21, 2025 9:18 pm
by Jim Burton
'A gift to paedophiles': Tories slam Sentencing Bill as they try to block sex offenders from early release

https://www.lbc.co.uk/article/paedophil ... 5HjdFfs_2/

Re: "PEDO BEARS ARE GO!": 2,000 paedophiles to be let out of prison early

Posted: Tue Oct 21, 2025 10:51 pm
by BLueRibbon
These include bids to require courts to collect and publish detailed data on sentencing, to make judges' sentencing remarks publicly available within two days, to automatically prevent parents convicted of child sexual offences from having parental rights, to extend the time victims and families have to challenge lenient sentences, and to expand whole-life orders for the murder of police or prison officers.
This is probably sloppy journalism, but the bolded part is wild.

Dad looks at boy porn; automatically can't be a parent to his daughter?