Page 1 of 1

CSAM for me, but not for thee!

Posted: Mon Oct 27, 2025 9:27 am
by Jim Burton
"Look, it's so easy for LEOs like us to produce completely ethical CP, without involving a real child!"

https://www.registercitizen.com/capital ... 106314.php
The minor was actually Hartford Police Detective Rafael Dacampo, who used an AI-generated image of a teenage girl as a profile picture and the screen name "Babababy15" in an undercover investigation, according to the arrest warrant.

Re: CSAM for me, but not for thee!

Posted: Mon Oct 27, 2025 11:21 am
by Bookshelf
The harms involved in AI generated CSAM are super serious, and they normalize real CSAM, and the real children whose visages were used to create the images are offended against every time they're used...

Which is why we at Moral Police Departmentâ„¢ have decided to use it because when we use it, all the harms we just said don't really apply.

Re: CSAM for me, but not for thee!

Posted: Mon Oct 27, 2025 11:32 am
by BLueRibbon
The officer wasn't sexually aroused by children.

That's the real crime, but nobody is willing to admit it.

Re: CSAM for me, but not for thee!

Posted: Mon Oct 27, 2025 10:20 pm
by jessika
police are corrupt hypocrites...always have been and always will be.
i was in prison long enough to see a thing or two.
how do you think contraband gets in the facilities.?

Re: CSAM for me, but not for thee!

Posted: Tue Oct 28, 2025 1:48 am
by PorcelainLark
Maybe I misread the article but I didn't see them talk about any artificial PIM.

Re: CSAM for me, but not for thee!

Posted: Tue Oct 28, 2025 10:02 pm
by Jim Burton
PorcelainLark wrote: Tue Oct 28, 2025 1:48 am Maybe I misread the article but I didn't see them talk about any artificial PIM.
The earlier article (linked in the copy) suggests the headline is clickbait, and this is the case, but it is not fully clear whose "explicit content" was shared due to the poor wording.

Given the presence of decoys and their inability to share explicit content, it can be argued they encourage "predators" to pressurize girls into sharing their photos to prove they are real. In that case, there would be an ethical as well as a results-based argument for expanding the arsenal to explicit AI porn, and with Australian LEOs now able to share the real thing, I do wonder what is holding them back.