MAP Forum

I think a closed fist can be seen as aggressive (obviously the resistance image with the man with the rifle is 'confrontational'). A 'peace' sign might be softer.

I'm 'biased,' this might sound repetitive/tedious since most pro-MAP people aren't hedonists (and hedonists don't necessarily realize what hedonism implies about age-gap taboos and sexuality in general), but I would like 'happiness for all' or 'everyone deserves happiness,' since I see destigmatization as being a response to sexual exclusion/poverty (you could oppose discrimination or hatred against MAPs while still stigmatizing their attraction).

I've personally never really liked the idea of a flag for my belief system because what if someone doesn't like the colors/design and why does a universalist belief need a 'symbol' that has nothing to do with the message (I'm not sure how to explain) that, again, won't be to everyone's taste or people who don't hold that belief system might like the colors and not want it associated with something they oppose, etc. You could probably make a similar argument about sexual orientation flags, not that I really 'care.' To be honest, I don't see my sexual orientation as a core part of my identity in terms of feeling existentially attached to it.