Page 1 of 2

AI chatbot Grok posts sexual images of minors after ‘lapses in safeguards’

Posted: Mon Jan 05, 2026 2:53 pm
by Jim Burton
https://www.straitstimes.com/world/unit ... safeguards

https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/ ... ne/685482/

https://spitfirenews.com/p/grok-csam-de ... -elon-musk
Billionaire Elon Musk’s artificial intelligence chatbot Grok said “lapses in safeguards” led to the generation of sexualised images of minors that it posted to social media site X.

Grok created images of minors in minimal clothing in response to user prompts over the past few days, violating its own acceptable use policy, which prohibits the sexualisation of children, the chatbot said in a series of posts on X this week in response to user queries.

The offending images were taken down, it added.

Re: AI chatbot Grok posts sexual images of minors after ‘lapses in safeguards’

Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2026 8:10 pm
by Jim Burton
Wired say that Grok's own website is even better for pervs!

https://www.wired.com/story/grok-is-gen ... hats-on-x/
Elon Musk’s Grok chatbot has drawn outrage and calls for investigation after being used to flood X with “undressed” images of women and sexualized images of what appear to be minors. However, that’s not the only way people have been using the AI to generate sexualized images. Grok’s website and app, which are are separate from X, include sophisticated video generation that is not available on X and is being used to produce extremely graphic, sometimes violent, sexual imagery of adults that is vastly more explicit than images created by Grok on X. It may also have been used to create sexualized videos of apparent minors.

Re: AI chatbot Grok posts sexual images of minors after ‘lapses in safeguards’

Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2026 8:37 pm
by Not Forever
It may also have been used to create sexualized videos of apparent minors.
How could they not have used it for that reason… I mean, damn, even Blender could be used to create photorealistic images (and whether it’s generated by AI or with 3D modeling software doesn’t really change much: there are no “victims”), even a pencil… I mean, have you seen some drawings that look like actual three-dimensional objects?

Where are the sensationalist articles about 3D modeling and pencils? Actually, I take that back… I’d never want to end up with Blender with built-in AI that monitors whether pornographic or violent content, or content involving minors, is being produced.

Re: AI chatbot Grok posts sexual images of minors after ‘lapses in safeguards’

Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2026 9:43 pm
by Jim Burton
Elon Musk’s ex makes chilling prediction amid 'urgent' Grok probe over indecent images of women and children

If I were him, I would employ a PA dedicated to negotiating and doling out child support to the mothers I have impregnated.

https://www.unilad.com/technology/news/ ... 7-20260106

Re: AI chatbot Grok posts sexual images of minors after ‘lapses in safeguards’

Posted: Sun Jan 11, 2026 9:54 pm
by Jim Burton
This story really took off.

The Canary, Ofcom to investigate Grok after allegations of sexual images of minors

https://www.thecanary.co/trending/2026/ ... fcom-grok/

BBC News, X restricts Grok features amid deepfake outrage

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cvg1mzlryxeo

Futurism, Elon Musk comments on Grok making sexualized images of children

https://futurism.com/artificial-intelli ... k-children

The Canary, Farage opposes banning X despite Grok scandal

https://www.thecanary.co/trending/2026/ ... opposes-x/

MassLive, Viewpoint: Massachusetts lawmakers must act to protect children’s images from AI perversion

https://www.masslive.com/westernmass/20 ... point.html

Max Read (Substack), Why won’t someone do something about AI porn?

https://maxread.substack.com/p/why-wont ... hing-about

The Dallas Express, Anti-trafficking group asks feds to investigate Grok for deepfakes, child porn

https://dallasexpress.com/national/anti ... hild-porn/

MediaNama, As safe harbor frays, X and Grok face heat over alleged CSAM content

https://www.medianama.com/2026/01/223-s ... am-content

The Queen’s Journal, There’s a line that even AI shouldn’t cross

https://www.queensjournal.ca/theres-a-l ... ldnt-cross

CyberDaily, eSafety Commissioner suggests action against Grok over sexualised deepfakes and CSAM

https://www.cyberdaily.au/digital-trans ... generation

Al Jazeera, EU flags ‘appalling’ child-like deepfakes generated via X’s Grok AI

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/1/5 ... xs-grok-ai

Boing Boing, Politician who sought browser bans shrugs: ‘CSAM on X is a personal choice’

https://boingboing.net/2026/01/08/csam- ... -porn.html

Re: AI chatbot Grok posts sexual images of minors after ‘lapses in safeguards’

Posted: Sun Jan 11, 2026 11:19 pm
by Jim Burton
This most recent piece from GB News is particularly revealing (fast forward to comments).

It reveals how Chuds (primary viewer segment for GB News) are being railroaded by Elon Musk into defending emulated Child Porn as freeze peach, because of course real abuse is worse, especially when Pakistani Brown Man Bad is involved.

And another UK suburban wive's organization with a stupid name.

https://www.gbnews.com/news/x-ben-arabe ... sations-id

Re: AI chatbot Grok posts sexual images of minors after ‘lapses in safeguards’

Posted: Wed Jan 14, 2026 6:23 pm
by Jim Burton
Gaslighting Britain: Why Labour Targets X Instead of the Real Online Abusers

https://conservativepost.co.uk/gaslight ... e-abusers/

Apple's utter silence about AI-generated child porn on X is appalling yet unsurprising

https://appleinsider.com/articles/26/01 ... surprising

The Canary, Ofcom to investigate Grok after allegations of sexual images of minors

https://www.thecanary.co/trending/2026/ ... fcom-grok/

BBC News, X restricts Grok features amid deepfake outrage

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cvg1mzlryxeo

Futurism, Elon Musk comments on Grok making sexualized images of children

https://futurism.com/artificial-intelli ... k-children

The Canary, Farage opposes banning X despite Grok scandal

https://www.thecanary.co/trending/2026/ ... opposes-x/

MassLive, Viewpoint: Massachusetts lawmakers must act to protect children’s images from AI perversion

https://www.masslive.com/westernmass/20 ... point.html

Max Read (Substack), Why won’t someone do something about AI porn?

https://maxread.substack.com/p/why-wont ... hing-about

The Dallas Express, Anti-trafficking group asks feds to investigate Grok for deepfakes, child porn

https://dallasexpress.com/national/anti ... hild-porn/

MediaNama, As safe harbor frays, X and Grok face heat over alleged CSAM content

https://www.medianama.com/2026/01/223-s ... m-content/

The Queen’s Journal, There’s a line that even AI shouldn’t cross

https://www.queensjournal.ca/theres-a-l ... dnt-cross/

CyberDaily, eSafety Commissioner suggests action against Grok over sexualised deepfakes and CSAM

https://www.cyberdaily.au/digital-trans ... generation

Al Jazeera, EU flags ‘appalling’ child-like deepfakes generated via X’s Grok AI

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/1/5 ... xs-grok-ai

Boing Boing, Politician who sought browser bans shrugs: ‘CSAM on X is a personal choice’

https://boingboing.net/2026/01/08/csam- ... -porn.html

The National, Elon Musk shrugs off responsibility as Grok makes sexual images of young girls

https://www.thenational.scot/news/25739 ... age-girls/

Ars Technica, X’s half-assed attempt to paywall Grok doesn’t block free image editing

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/202 ... e-editing/

Conservative Post, Gaslighting Britain: Why Labour targets X instead of the real online abusers

https://conservativepost.co.uk/gaslight ... e-abusers/

Re: AI chatbot Grok posts sexual images of minors after ‘lapses in safeguards’

Posted: Wed Jan 14, 2026 6:47 pm
by Aspire6
I always can't help but laugh at the ignorant idea that stopping Grok from doing this will "stop" it from happening.
The tech is out there, it can run entirely locally on personal computers (expensive, but possible). There is no stopping it and there is no slowing it down.

Re: AI chatbot Grok posts sexual images of minors after ‘lapses in safeguards’

Posted: Wed Jan 14, 2026 8:00 pm
by Jim Burton
https://www.ladbible.com/entertainment/ ... 8-20260107
Marvel star Xochitl Gomez spoke out about the gut-wrenching moment she discovered pornographic deepfakes using her face had been circulating on X.

Celebrities have been the targets of deepfakes since the dawn of AI, and while some may seem amusing, there are a lot of deeply inappropriate sexual images of popular faces floating aroudn the internet without consent.

One person who has been impacted by this epidemic is Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness star Gomez, who spoke out about the harrowing moment she learnt her face had been used to create explicit deepfakes back in 2024.

Touching on the topic during an interview on The Squeeze podcast - which is hosted by actor Taylor Lautner and his wife, also named Taylor Lautner - the 19-year-old remembered being 'weirded out' after seeing the images on X.

"It made me weirded out and I didn’t like it and I wanted it taken down. That was my main thought process was, 'Down. Take this down. Please'." she recalled.

Re: AI chatbot Grok posts sexual images of minors after ‘lapses in safeguards’

Posted: Thu Jan 15, 2026 7:02 pm
by Jim Burton
The Nation, Elon Musk’s Grok and the boundaries of speech around pedophilia

https://www.thenation.com/article/socie ... ophilia/#/

Los Angeles Times, Newsom calls for investigation into social media site amid obscenity backlash

https://www.latimes.com/california/stor ... media-site

Firstpost, Pentagon to Integrate Elon Musk's Grok Despite Obscenity Row | Vantage With Palki Sharma

https://www.firstpost.com/vantage/penta ... 63013/amp/

MSN, Why Grok — not ChatGPT or Gemini — became epicentre of obscenity backlash

https://www.msn.com/en-in/money/news/wh ... r-AA1TLaqa

Organiser, X admits lapse in Grok obscenity row; removes over 600 accounts and 3,500 posts after government intervention

https://organiser.org/2026/01/12/334595 ... ervention/