MAP Forum

I'm tired of people pretending that antis care about morals when in reality the opposite is true. Not only do they call for violent executions of MAPs just for existing, but they actually threaten minors too. The ones they claim to be "protecting", [removed], just to mention one, had thousands of people harassing her and was sent death threats for her sexual behavior online as a minor. And then there's the miserable incel known as [removed] who regularly slut shames minors for views and calls them "disgusting" among other things

The staff of this site have mentioned sexualized minors themselves before. What crazy hypocrisy. I can't even say anything

I’m slightly confused about the editing: in the first case, isn’t it about an adult who later spoke publicly about their abuse? As for the second case, I don’t think it really falls under examples of sexualized minors, though I admit I only did a very quick search.

Don't worry, I get what you mean. And yeah, antis can be a bunch of hypocrites. They think they're 'morally superior,' which gives them the right to kill people who are 'morally inferior.' Unironically. Yeah, they are sorely lacking in self-awareness.

I was on a Swedish MAP site recently. They really lay down the law to new members. It must turn them on.

Undercover wrote: Sun Feb 01, 2026 5:06 am The staff of this site have mentioned sexualized minors themselves before. What crazy hypocrisy. I can't even say anything

You're talking about a minor who sold nudes online. Rule 2 seems pretty clear that that isn't allowed.

Erotica (whether photographic, artificially-generated, drawn, or written) is strictly prohibited. Links to such material, tips on where to find such material, and requests for such material, are not allowed.

Otherwise people could direct others to erotica using a host of excuses.

Porcelain could certainly have chosen a better term than 'sexualized minors', but he was right to edit your post.

His reasoning, as explained above, is clear and correct.