Why the Secret World Government launched the paedofascism
Posted: Sat Apr 25, 2026 9:23 pm
Read this book and you will find out how and for what purposes the Secret World Government launched the paedofascism (the paedofile panic).
The Secret World Government's objectives in creating the paedofile panic (paedofile hysteria, paedofascism):
1. Keeping slaves' (the population's) minds busy looking for and fearing "pedofiles". So that the sheep do not notice and do not oppose the enslavement process.
2. Enslavement. There are already 6 mln. people on the US Sexual Offenders List (mostly kids texting sexual messages or pics). These people can't live where they want, whey can't get job where they want, they have lots of other restrictions. They are 100% slaves!
3. Young girls are free for the members of the Secret World Government. The members of the SWG are not punished (it's their kingdom, they own these countries, they are the rulers, they control all government institutions). So, they can use girls (boys)(not spoiled or engaged by slaves) for their purposes.
Many people claim that the origin of the paedofascism are feminists. This idea can't be farther from the truth. Nobody would have listened to them. A power, a real government, a real force was required to establish laws and practices prevailing today.
Do you really think that ugly middle-aged fat psychopathic envious hags filled with faeces and hatred wanted to help beautiful young girls who were at the highest levels of happiness being in relations with the most beautiful men with whom they were in love?
You're not that stupid, right? They (so-called feminists) were and are SWG's agents.
Do you really think that independent (of the Secret World Government) politicians (law-makers) would have listened to a gang of hags and put innocent men in jail? Definitely not.
Raising the age of consent is the old agenda of the Secret World Government. As we know, Napoleon was SWG's appointee. (In reality, Napoleon Bonapart, was the first fascist in the empire, and the bourgeois revolutions in France were creations of the Secret World Government (Daniel Estulin's book Bilderberg Club's Secrets)). Right after seizing power, Napoleon (the Secret World Government) established an age of consent law (The French Napoleonic code (the first French constitution of 1791) created the legal context in 1791 when it set the age of consent to 11 years old.) (Not higher yet, to avoid public dissent).
In 1863, France raised the age of consent to 13. In 1945, the age of consent in France was raised to 15.
As the SWG was seizing power in different countries, the SWG would increase the age of consent in those countries.
In Tsarist Russia the age of consent was 10yo. When SWG (represented by bolsheviks) seized power in Russia, they raised the age of consent to 14.
When SWG destroyed the Soviet Union and seized power in the contemporary Russia, it set the age of consent at 18yo. (Present Russia is under full totalitarian control of the SWG (low probability of any revolt). They do with the people there anything they want.)
Now their agenda is to raise it to 30yo. You want to have relations with a girl under 30? Become our slave (go to jail). 21yo is already officially in UN programs. Just wait several years.
The SWG is not raising the aoc abruptly yet because there's still high enough risk of people's revolt. Especially in Germany, UK and France, where people are onto the Secret World Government.
Throughout the entire history of mankind there were maniacs sadists who murdered and raped children. If found, they were inevitably executed. (Which served them right). The law provided very well for such cases. Raising the age of consent contributed absolutely nothing to the reduction of murders and rapes of kids. It contributed well to their increase.
Proofs of the Secret World Government existence:
1. Migrants (people don't want them, but they are encouraged to enter more and more). If politicians were elected, people would have elected politicians who would stop migrants' waves. However, since politicians in western countries are not elected but appointed by the SWG, these politicians do what their owners (SWG) command.
2. Taxes. A truly elected (by people) government would implement people's wishes (one of them is to pay less taxes and leave more money for oneself). Heck no! The SWG would never let worms (people (you, our dear reader)) prevent the SWG from robbing you of your hard earned with blood and sweat money. Whereas they've got enough money for millions of years to come. See how greedy these creatures are! They still plunder you of your pittance.
3. Depriving people of pensions (last prominent example -- pension age raising in France, Russia and other countries).
4. 911 leaves no doubts today as to the involvement and staging by US leaders (the SWG) of the entire affair. 911 was a stupidity, but, at the same time, necessity for the SWG.
Well, maybe not such a stupidity after all. It was stupidity because it revealed and made evident to the public that SWG does exist. It was a necessity because they needed such a catastrophe to impose dictatorship on American people, expanding it to other countries of course.
End so on.
So, the governments are not elected by the population of their countries. It is so f-ng obvious! There can't be a morsel of doubt about that. Which means... Bingo! Someone appoints them.
Listen, those creatures from the SWG are not that hermetically isolated. They have fairly diluted staff (security, cleaners, cooks...) These servants know loooooots of things about the SWG. They talk to them, their kids (heirs) (very blabbering creatures really, divulge lots of stuff) talk to them. That's how we (the authors of these lines) know about it.
People not believing in SWG are either outright stupid or work for the SWG (making believe not believing). Such people are really rare nowadays. Today almost everyone believes in SWG. Just ask. One of the best sources to read about SWG is Daniel Estulin's book Bilderberg Club's Secrets.
Once someone seizes power in a country, it becomes very complicated business to overthrow them. Imagine a person wanted to overthrow Stalin. Slightest suspicion, Stalin just says soldiers to go and shoot the person. Very simple.
Well, now the SWG already controls the majority of countries on this planet. If you try to run an election campaign and you are not one of those appointed by SWG, you either end up on any pretext removed from the elections (law prosecution, accusations, dirt pouring in media), or bribed, or, well, dead. Ask someone from any country of the Western world, you'll hear enough stories of this kind.
In 80s bludgeon approach was yet dangerous for the SWG. There was high risk of people insurgence, finding members (at least some) of the SWG and executing them (like Ceausescu). After 911, after the introduction of the totalitarism into US society, such insurgence is much less probable. Slightest sign and those involved would be in jail in minutes.
Without SWG's control of judges, judges would act reasonably. Lawmakers are not elected, they are appointed. They do what they're told. They pass laws that they were told to pass. Feminists and envious mentally deranged people and maniacal sadists vigilantes couldn't do anything. They just consequences.
You see here exactly why most feminists are not just silent about Third World mass immigration, but very often actively support it. (An order from the Secret World Government).
2. How SWG control people’s minds.
In late eighties Noam Chomsky and Edward Herman, who knew about the Secret World Government’s propaganda and studied its psychological enslaving of the population, wrote in their work Manufacturing Consent about how the Secret World Government manipulates people.
Propaganda does not just aim to send a message; it aims to construct reality as such. This is what Noam Chomsky and Edward Herman, in their analysis of propaganda from the late eighties, defined as “manufacturing of consent”: the process of establishing a normative reality that conforms to specific interests of elite power (Secret World Government). Same things were written by Stanley Cohen in his Folk Devils and Moral Panics, 1972.
“Hurting children is one of the worst things you can say someone is doing. It’s an easy way to demonize your enemy,” says Kathryn Olmsted, a person who studied conspiracy theories, a professor of history at the University of California-Davis.
It´s vital to realize that such hysterias have been promoted over and over again to keep people on the Proper Track. Such ruses have worked very effectively by mobilizing community opinion in favor of vapid, empty concepts like Family Values. Who can be against that? Or Harmony. Who can be against that? Or, as in the child sex abuse hysteria of the day: "Save the Children!" Who can be against that?
"If you´re not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed and loving the people who are doing the oppressing."--Malcolm X.
Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media is a 1988 book by Edward S. Herman and Noam Chomsky.
What is the theory of manufacturing consent?
It argues that the mass communication media of the U.S. "are effective and powerful ideological institutions that carry out a system-supportive propaganda function, by reliance on market forces, internalized assumptions, and self-censorship, and without overt coercion", by means of the propaganda model of communication...
The people with real power are the ones who own the society, which is a pretty narrow group (Secret World Government).
You’ve got to keep the bewildered herd pretty scared (one of the sources of the scare is paedohysteria), because unless they’re properly scared and frightened of all kinds of devils that are going to destroy them from outside or inside or somewhere, they may start to think, which is very dangerous for the Secret World Government. Therefore it’s important to distract them and marginalize them.
In what is nowadays called a totalitarian state, or a military state, it’s easy. You just hold a bludgeon over their heads, and if they get out of line you smash them over the head. But as society has become more free and democratic, you lose that capacity. Therefore you have to turn to the techniques of propaganda. The logic is clear. Propaganda is to a democracy what the bludgeon is to a totalitarian state. That’s wise and good because, again, the common interests elude the bewildered herd. They can’t figure them out.
https://www.highexistence.com/wonder-te ... ered-herd/
The problem with the bewildered herd is that it can never truly be tamed, only contained. And so propaganda – the whip of the lion tamer, the bludgeon of the dictator – must be ever-present. Up to this point, we’ve learned about the prevailing conception of democracy, the first modern uses of propaganda, and the symbiotic relationship between the political class and private power. In the next part, we explore the seven ways propaganda is used and infused in society to numb the herd into reluctant obedience.
Chomsky says if there’s anything the specialized class hates, it’s when the bewildered herd organize themselves into semi-rational units:
“The people in the public relations industry aren’t there for the fun of it. They’re doing work. They’re trying to instill the right values. In fact, they have a conception of what democracy ought to be: It ought to be a system in which the specialized class is trained to work in the service of the masters, the people who own the society (the Secret World Government). The rest of the population ought to be deprived of any form of organization, because organization just causes trouble. They ought to be sitting alone in front of the TV and having drilled into their heads the message, which says, the only value in life is to have more commodities or live like that rich middle class family you’re watching and to have nice values like harmony and Americanism. That’s all there is in life. You may think in your own head that there’s gotta be something more in life than this, but since you’re watching the tube alone you assume, I must be crazy, because that’s all that’s going on over there. And since there is no organization permitted that’s absolutely crucial – you never have a way of finding out whether you are crazy, and you just assume it, because it’s the natural thing to assume.”
A simple example: Webster’s analysis of the British children’s home paedophile panic of the 1980s and 90s, The Secret of Bryn Estyn, launched by direct instructions from the Secret World Government, is one of the great solo investigations. Webster showed that the entire series of episodes, the result of a nation-wide ‘trawling’ by the police for paedophile networks preying on the residents of children’s homes, was a fantasy; the result of sloppy journalism, public officials afraid of being blamed for ignoring a scandal, and lies told by some of the former residents who were motivated by the police promise of large compensation for any abuse. Webster dismantles the whole thing and concludes that many wrongful convictions ensued.
If such panic propagation projects were not launched and fueled by the Secret World Government, never would the nonsense have run as far as it did. Independent journalists would have been more careful, the police and lawyers would have been a bit more sceptical (and more careful).
In Denmark, the Vadstrupgaard case in 1997 where a male kindergarten employee was accused of sexual molestation of several children was one of events staged by the Secret World Government that initiated a paedophile panic in Denmark. The term panic is adequate since the media focused on child professionals and the relevant trade unions together were involved in 133 cases of alleged sexual abuse from 1995 to 2002. Only in two cases were the accused found guilty, showing that the fear of paedophilia had entered into the public imagination on an unprecedented scale.
The issue is … whether we want to live in a free society or whether we want to live under what amounts to “a form of self-imposed totalitarianism, with the bewildered herd marginalized, directed elsewhere, terrified, screaming patriotic slogans, fearing for their lives and admiring with awe the leader who saved them from destruction, while the educated masses goose-step on command and repeat the slogans they’re supposed to repeat and the society deteriorates at home.”
Movie End Game 2007 (about the Secret World Government): "But what they are describing is the complete end of democracy, the end of what matters to people, the end of what happens to the human journey, and for that reason I think this is revolting. The truth of their world government has now been exposed. We know you are ruthless, we know you are evil.”
Did the paedophylic hysteria exist before the propaganda? No. Neither Krafft-Ebing nor Freud nor any of their contemporaries had a lot to say about pedophilia. They didn't consider pedophilia much of a problem, unlike homosexuality, which they wrote a lot about. They were very concerned about homosexuality. At the time, pedophilia was considered only a temporary sexual deviance. Freud considered exclusive pedophilia (sexual attraction exclusively to prepubescent children) something rare, calling it a "sporadic aberration".
Philip Jenkins was a fairly obscure historian until 1996, when reactionary Catholics made him an improbable star. He began his career as a professor of criminal justice at Pennsylvania State University, specializing in the debunking of alleged "crime waves". For criminological journals he wrote four articles on what he considered the unjustified fear of serial murderers in England. In his 1992 book, Intimate Enemies: Moral Panics in Contemporary Great Britain, he broadened his analysis of "constructed" social fears to cover "witch hunts" over Satanism, rape, incest, paedophilia, child pornography, homosexuality and drugs. In each case an "imaginary menace" is manufactured by the Secret World Government ("moral entrepreneurs") as a form of "symbolic politics".
Aggressive, demonising caricatures and slander directed against well-meaning paedophiles are spread by malicious individuals—the media and influential figures with an interest in inciting hatred.
According to sociologist Stanley Cohen, the intensification of deviance usually begins with a focus on some ‘deviant’, typically ‘criminal’, issue. This may concern legal matters relating to sexual orientations that are commonly regarded as immoral.
Now that the media are focusing on the issue, misinformation may begin to spread. Hidden, extreme and marginal cases are being reported and amplified, despite their atypical nature. Reported cases of such deviance are often presented as ‘only those we know about’ or ‘the tip of the iceberg’. This claim sounds alarming, but it is virtually impossible to prove or disprove. Judges and magistrates are then put under pressure by the Secret World Government with the aim of the imposition of harsher sentences. And politicians, acting on the instructions of the Secret World Government, pass tougher laws, giving the impression that they are combating this threat. These reactions by politicians, as a rule, serve to intensify fear within society even further.
This self-reinforcing and self-perpetuating pattern was first documented by Stanley Cohen in his book Demons of the People and Moral Panic.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
How SWG make innocent people seem to be rapists and murderers of children
The SWG’s main objective here was to mix innocent people with real criminals (murderers and rapist of children). Mark, SWG dogs never (never!!!) use the word “murderer” or “rapist” of children. No! They always use the word “pedophile”. This is how the SWG propaganda professionals taught them. And there is a serious reason for this.
This way they mingle real predators, real monsters, real murderers and rapists of kids (whose psychological portrait is fully identical with those of the members of the SWG) with, for example, an innocent 25yo fella who is desperately in love with a 15yo girl, who, in turn, is desperately in love with him. Or a beautiful 30yo man who chatted about sex with 14yo girls who liked him a lot. Or kids texting about sex with each other or sending naked pictures of themselves.
Murders and rapes of kids are relatively rare, so, the SWG, to blow up the panic and sow fear, had to widen the scale of those to be feared, calling them the all-encompassing word “pedofiles”.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Secret World Government intentionally propagate kids’ suicides
After the Secret World Government imposed laws prohibiting online sexual chats where minors actively participated, an abrupt increase in kids' suicides was observed. Did the Secret World Government know, that their actions will launch tremendous waves of youth's suicides? Yes, they did. Did they do it on purpose? Definitely. They did it on purpose. They are very, very bloodthirsty. They enjoy torturing and murdering people a lot.
Although ‘DANGER’ signs have been posted all over the corners of cyberspace, the online world is actually one of the safest places to explore one’s sexuality. If a young woman is keen to test her ‘keyboard skills’ in cybersex, she can experiment with sexual positions and fantasies without worrying about pregnancy, or even, for the most part, about getting emotionally involved. If things get ‘too hot’, she can politely take her leave or simply block an overly passionate suitor... If things get ‘too hot’, she can politely take her leave or simply brush off an overly eager suitor.
Here is a typical portrait of the paedocrites (this is a scientific study):
In many societies dominated by traditional, sexually repressive values, there is no shortage of rape, murder and the like. In this context, it is instructive to consider the views of the most scarred victims of our society: the criminally insane. Hans Eysenck’s book *Sex and Personality* presents a remarkable study of 186 patients at Broadmoor Hospital, the UK’s leading institution for criminally insane individuals. 3% of them had been admitted under Section 26 of the *Mental Health Act*, whilst the remainder had been convicted of the following:
16% sexual offences (rape)
11% arson
26% murder (whether intentional or unintentional)
28% attempted murder and causing bodily harm
16% robbery and property offences.
One might have expected that the views on sexuality expressed within such a group would reveal something that conservatives would immediately deem appallingly wrong—a failure to embrace traditional values. Far from it. On the contrary, it turned out that these values had been embraced all too well:
Broadmoor patients are, on the whole, far more sexually inhibited than the ‘normal’ group. Consequently, they find it more difficult to become sexually aroused; they rarely think about sex; they consciously try to banish thoughts of sex from their minds; and when they do experience strong sexual feelings, they are unable to express them; do not think about sex every day; claim that they find it very difficult to become aroused; view sex merely as a means of reproduction rather than a way of deriving pleasure; sex is not particularly important to them; they are not aroused by the thought of an affair.
They draw clear distinctions between what constitutes appropriate and inappropriate sexual behaviour; they find the sight of animals copulating repulsive; there are things they would never do with anyone; they find the idea of a sexual orgy repulsive; they do not believe that, in some cases, a woman can be sexually aggressive; They prefer to have sex under the covers in the dark; they would not want to scratch or bite their sexual partners; they object to the use of four-letter words in the company of people of the opposite sex; they consider wife-swapping to be indecent; they find certain forms of lovemaking repulsive.
They hold very conservative views on the subject of sexuality:
They are not interested in the possibility of seeing someone naked; they will protect their children from being exposed to sex; they will not take the opportunity to watch others having sex; they are against the unrestricted publication of pornographic stories; they believe in sexual censorship; their morality is unambiguous and straightforward; they believe that sexual liberation undermines society; they do not consider sexual play between children to be harmless; they believe it is right for a man to dominate.
But they are no longer merely potential offenders; they are criminals who have committed heinous crimes! And yet there are still so many serial killers at large who have not yet committed any crimes or been caught! But we now know their typical psychological profile!
Now where are vigilante gangs from? Maniacs (sadists) obtained a right to torture and murder innocent people impunibly(!!!) That is where the vigilante gangs are from.
How many of those sadists went to look for a missing child? We'll tell you the official statistics: none of them. Finding a missing child or saving someone just does not give the sadists satisfaction. That's why.
Far from it. Lots of times the real raper or murderer of a kid turns out to be a boisterous anti-paedo vigilante. (And what else did you expect from a sadist?)
Facts are a stubborn thing. The facts and the statistics rigidly demonstrate that rapes and murders of kids are committed not by minor attracted persons, but by persons with standard sexual orientation preferring grown-up sexual partners. Frequently they are under the influence of alcohol and frequently they become “opportunity rapists or murderers”, i.e. when an opportunity to kill or rape presents itself (darkness, absence of other people nearby, etc.)
Whereas MAPs’ love towards children is sincere and lacking any desire to inflict harm. Children feel it very well. Kids’ senses work as very good radars. Otherwise they wouldn’t let MAPs near themselves and loving MAPs would never be able to win children’s confidence.
There are grounds for believing that the aggressive, sexist objectification of girls as sexual objects is predominantly characteristic of men with a ‘standard’ sexual orientation who prefer adult women. These offenders often have a tendency to break the law in non-sexual contexts as well. At the time of the offence, they are often drunk and, whilst at home, use the child as an accessible and defenceless substitute for the adult partner they prefer.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sex educator and investigative journalist, Judith Levine, writes in her 2002 book Harmful to Minors: The Perils of Protecting Children from Sex, “Projecting sexual menace onto a cardboard monster and pouring money and energy into vanquishing him distracts adults from teaching children the subtle skills of loving with both trust and discrimination.”
Judith Levine's book Harmful to Minors: The Perils of Protecting Children from Sex is based upon the premise, “for our part, adults owe children not only protection and a schooling in safety but also the entitlement to pleasure.” (Levine and Elders, 2003).
There is probably more baby rape going on as a result of paedohysteria. Society doesn't distinguish between what is normal (i.e. to find teenagers sexually attractive) and what is not normal (desire to rape babies). Both are defined as 'paedophilia'. If you define millions of ordinary men as paedophiles, unfortunately some of them are going to take that label and run with it.
Creating too much attention and drama around it *could* serve to give already 'unhinged' or mentally disturbed persons ideas or fuel their 'fantasies' e.g how can I plump the lowest depths or break the biggest taboo's (clearly there are disturbed people out there thinking along those lines).
So I think making the public aware is one thing, but creating excessive drama and hysteria around it *could* cause problems - as you do often get 'copy cat' criminals - looking for any kind of attention by trying to plump what they perhaps view as the depths of depravity.
Families become distrustful of one another, watching out for signs of abuse. Parents distrust teachers and doctors. These professionals, in turn, spy on parents. Fear of child sex abuse is one of the most acute problems of a society that is dissolving in mistrust and panic, where our most basic social bond, the love of a child, can be turned inside out into a fear and hatred of others. Fear of the predatory abuser fixes upon a potential danger. Of course parents should take any reasonable precautions, but at a certain point, the fear itself can become the most destructive thing in life.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Secret World Government uses paedofile hysteria to enslave young children
Children who create and send sexually explicit messages of themselves electronically will be breaking the law in Rhode Island, after a new Bill was signed this week.
Under the new measure, anyone below the age of 18 who creates and sends a sexually inappropriate image of themselves can be charged with a “status” offence. Such offences are acts which are only considered criminal when committed by a young person. Even tougher penalties can be handed out to those who possess or forward sexually explicit images of another young person. Such an action can be prosecuted under the state’s child pornography laws and if convicted the person may have to register as a sex offender.
Got that? To protect children from sex offenders, it's necessary to label children as ... sex offenders.
And I'd call having underage kids on a sex offenders register (SWG’s slaves list) for life classes as pretty bloody damaging for the kids they profess to be protecting.
Requiring a boy to answer unconditionally for everything he does, while concurrently insisting that he is not capable of making his own choices, sexual or otherwise, is both illogical and grossly unfair. Boys today have many sources of reliable information about sex, and therefore should not be dismissed as not having the background to make rational decisions in this area. A boy of 12 currently cannot legally consent to what he judges to be harmless sexual activities, but he can be held fully accountable, tried, and convicted of, for example, "sending a sexually inappropriate image of themselves". Hypocrites.
The crimes we are talking about can be both this and that. Dagbladet [a Norwegian newspaper, the heading reads "Risks prison after smacking butts"] reported that two boys of 13 from Oregon risked juvenile prison and registration as sex offenders after slapping girls' asses at their school. A girl of 14 could be charged with distribution of child pornography after posting nude pictures of herself. Posting pictures is called sexting and has become a way for young people to express their sexuality. Here we can read about the legal antics that occurred when a 13 year old girl was at the same time tried as a perpetrator and a victim in the same trial (was dangerous and in danger), revealing in its own way the immense hypocrisy involved whenever children and sexuality is a topic.
Now, dear reader, do you really think the Secret World Government imposed the paedohysteria to protect kids? Far from it. The SWG imposed it to enslave our children! Kids on the Sexual Offenders List can’t choose where to live, they can’t choose where to work, lots of other restrictions… They’re already slaves!
You may think that all these strict sex laws make the US the safest country in the world for children to grow up in. You think wrong. Safe childhood in the United States is defined in a very special way. The US Justice Department created a project called Project Safe Childhood. If we read a little on the website of this project, we quickly discover that child safety is a matter of safety from sex. This is perhaps not surprising, in a country that until recently did not give their own children a health service that we in Norway take for granted.
My own attempts to get to the bottom of the matter made me view these reports with suspicion, and my doubts only grew when I received frantic phone calls from parents and grandparents whose children and grandchildren were facing accusations in similar situations. In 1999, a single mother from Long Island (New York City) tracked me down to ask for help for her thirteen-year-old son, Adam, who had been accused of ‘sexual rubbing’ against his eleven-year-old sister (she had previously boasted about her sexual experiences to her friends, and then persuaded them to report him to the school psychologist). Adam was arrested, handcuffed, and threatened with trial as an adult on felony charges, and then placed in a strict Catholic institution (he was Jewish by faith) to undergo a compulsory rehabilitation programme for juvenile sex offenders, from which he was released on parole a year later on the condition that he would undergo outpatient treatment for at least another year. A grandmother from Michigan told me over the phone, in tears, that a facility for sex offenders had refused to release her eleven-year-old grandson because he refused to admit to a crime which, as he insisted, he had not committed. “They kept saying he was in denial, meaning that the treatment, they said, wasn’t working. So they just kept him behind bars.” Four years later, in the mid-1990s, according to my grandmother, the boy took his own life (may you all rot in hell, you damned paedophile fascists, destroyers of children; and your whole gang).
No less important than these personal tragedies affecting specific children is the effect this trend has on all children, including those who will never come anywhere near a child protection agency or a juvenile detention centre. Tony’s story is a specific example of the gradual pathologisation of normative childhood sexuality, that is, the behaviour exhibited by the majority of children. This has implications not only for behaviour deemed ‘deviant’, but also for the sexual behaviour of all children. Every time a new category of sexual deviation is defined—or, rather, invented—the entire scale of so-called normal behaviour is shifted several notches to the right. The views of both professionals and laypeople regarding what is acceptable for children, teenagers and their families are shifting towards a more conservative, more fearful and more restrictive stance, moving away from tolerance, humour and trust.
The word ‘normal’ is not a precise scientific term. It can refer to what most people do, or to what some people consider to be healthy, moral, customary or natural, as opposed to what is unhealthy, sinful, strange or unnatural. It could mean what my mum, my priest or a psychologist on Oprah Winfrey’s talk show considers acceptable. Or it could mean what I personally consider acceptable. What is ‘normal’ is extremely subject to change with every shift in the political and historical winds.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Age of Consent
The Age of Consent: We have no data to show that our increasingly restrictive age of consent laws – many of which will now make consensual activity between age-group peers a serious criminal offense that could end up slapping one partner with lifelong sex offender status – are beneficial to our youth or to our culture. Age of consent laws do not provide a meaningful deterrent to rape, sexual molestation or sexual abuse.
We have no evidence that Age of Consent laws assist in decreasing in teen pregnancy or STD/STI infection rates. Teen pregnancy and STD/STI rates in other countries Denmark and Sweden, for instance, or Japan, France, or Germany – where comprehensive sex education, social and medical support for sexually active teens, and less restrictive age of consent laws, are far lower. It’s astounding to us that the United States government (dictated by the Secret World Government) can look at the facts and still keep pushing abstinence-only sex education and “child-protective” (especially given that young adults are not children) sexual laws as it does. We clearly care a whole lot less for the actual health, happiness, and well-being of our youth than we do for a given set of mores.
The Secret World Government seek to extend “childhood” into the mid-20s in an effort to obtain more control.
Read this article: https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/adultho ... 37174.html
I wish I could say this is a joke but it isn’t. We are moving from the “teen brain” to the “adolescent brain” and adolescence is now looking to be extended into the mid-20s. Too bad adolescence itself is a nonsense concept. For more info you can read this article: http://drrobertepstein.com/pdf/Epstein-THE_MYTH_OF_THE_TEEN_BRAINScientific_American_Mind-4-07.pdf?lbisphpreq=1
Then if you want even more info, read Epstein’s book “Teen 2.0”. He explains better than I can the myth of the “teen brain”. This applies to this new push to extend adolescence into the 20s. I will say this: the argument used is often based around frontal lobe development which people claim (after reading pop-science articles) only becomes “fully-developed” at 25. Problem is that isn’t how it works. The frontal lobe stops developing around 25 and begins to decline slowly until death. A person’s decision making ability has less to do with time based brain development and more to do with experience based brain development. Look at it like this, a child raised in the wilderness will not develop human language. When that child is found as an adult they will never be able to truly develop language, no matter how old they get. The lack of experience and use severely stunted the language parts of the brain. It works similar with the frontal lobe. Our modern culture keeps kids in bubbles. Prevents them from taking real responsibilities or risks. They make no real decisions and their frontal lobe is stimulated minimally, slowing its development and weakening the reasoning abilities of humans. This is why, as Epstein points out, teens from other cultures are often more mature and responsible than young adults of our culture. Those teens are given responsibilities and aren’t treated like toddlers. Now “researchers” and “scientists” want infantilization to apply to young adults. This is insanity. Why is this being pushed? Control. Suddenly, mandatory public education will extend for four years of “free” college. Further dumbing down out population and indoctrinating people to be even more complacent and accepting of statist control. After all, people are “adolescent” until they hit 25. No doubt the age of consent will raise to, further criminalizing male sexuality and forcing men to only legally being able to go for older women.
Get ready folks. You have heard how some people say liking 16-18 year old people is pedophilia? That’s gonna bump up to 23-25 year old people.
Parents and young people are routinely arrested and charged for merely having nude photos of themselves or other minors.
It’s funny, people really are noticing that child porn laws are nonsense, but the state doesn’t want to lose its easy money and easy avenue to convince people to give up privacy and freedom. The Secret World Government is a leviathan. Child porn is an easy way for it to give itself power and take it away from the people.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Now the Secret World Government put us in a situation where rebels of genuine courage, many long-dead, are utterly vilified for having spoken that which was so obviously true, while hateful, emotionally unstable, misandrists are lionized for their viciousness and sanctimonious cruelty;
Sexual stigmatisation is not new (many of those forced to bear the Pink Triangle were artists, poets, intellectuals, but all were someone’s son, someone’s daughter) but it has undoubtedly been given a new lease of life in our new, enlightened, post-Nazi age of paedohysteria. Terrence White, whose beautiful, moving article sponsored this little outburst, is one man who – with incalculable courage and inestimable ethical strength – is daring to resist the new fascists in our midst: sexual fascists. That he has been labelled a ‘paedo’ by these frightening bigots (frightening because they have so much unopposed power) is all the more reason to honour his heroism: he will not be silenced, no matter what the Infallible Guardians of Public Morality throw at him.
It is a true perversion that the honourable cause of protecting the vulnerable and powerless from exploitation has become a front for paranoid and merciless extremists, who now make lucrative careers out of knowingly destroying the lives of talented and valuable men like Terrence White, who I know would rather harm himself than harm a child.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A femihag is not competing in any way with young white girls for African migrants. She couldn’t care if African migrants are harassing or raping young white girls and women.
If a 15yo girl chooses a 35yo male... well, that definitely means that she finds him much much looooots of times much more attractive than anyone from her same age compeers. Feminists (sexually unsatisfied envious fat and ugly creatures (zombies)) are extremely jealous and angry (and envious of other people's happiness). Most definitely they would be accusing the poor fella and the poor young girlie.
Now, what we’ve got:
Female hypoagency. The demonization of male sexuality. Paedohysteria. Misandry. The false rape accusation epidemics. Victimeless crimes. The age-of-consent scam. Seventeen year-old "children". The sexual trade-union. Youthism. Children as a mean of extortion. Male disposability. The myth of sex-trafficking. The rescue industry. Female victimhood. The donation racket.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
An anonymous individual named “hfghf” asked my opinion on this article: http://metro.co.uk/2017/10/27/teenage-girls-want-relationships-with-older-men-thats-why-its-theirresponsibility-to-say-no-7032490/amp/ In it, the author admits teen girls like older men, but comes to near insane conclusions as to why and demands that men must say no (and continue to seek relationships with older females, I wonder why….nothing to do with her age being around the 30s….) I might not like it, you might like it, and we might all wish that it wasn’t true, but the thing is, teenage girls do fancy older men. They do desire them. They do indeed. In fact, females in general like older males. From preteens to adults. There are biological reasons for this.
I attended an all girl Catholic boarding school where there was, as you can imagine, sweet FA in terms of male attention to be had. I had always assumed that man-drought was the reason that most of us developed a passionate crush on a teacher at some point in our school career. But having spoken to women who were raised in slightly less bizarre circumstances, I’ve revised that assumption. It’s not just girls who go to school in the middle of nowhere with no boys to flirt with who form passionate romantic obsessions with male teachers. It happens at every school, in every town, all over the world.
Don’t we all have that friend who dated an ‘older’ guy when she was at school? I have more stories than I can count of sneaking out of school to meet up with men in their twenties and thirties.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Secret World Government are reducing our population
Everything is very simple: people are just afraid to have children. Yes, because of the paedophile panic blown to these proportions by the Secret World Government.
In reality, parents who batter their children are thankfully rare. But parents who sexually abuse their children are even rarer. Sexual offences against children are thankfully very rare, but of those offences, the vast majority are committed not by strangers, but by family members or close friends. “Paedophile” is a stereotype that does not describe the acts of incest that characterize most sex offences against children.
Virtually every person in our countries was brought up in a family, and virtually every one of them brought up with love and care. Such sexual abuse that does occur generally occurs in the family, but it is still extremely rare.
“Falling birth rates are the greatest crisis facing humanity – bar none,” Stephen J.Philip Jenkins was a fairly obscure historian until 1996, when reactionary Catholics made him an improbable star. He began his career as a professor of criminal justice at Pennsylvania State University, specialising in the debunking of alleged "crime waves". For criminological journals he wrote four articles on what he considered the unjustified fear of serial murderers in England. In his 1992 book, Intimate Enemies: Moral Panics in Contemporary Great Britain, he broadened his analysis of "constructed" social fears to cover "witch hunts" over Satanism, rape, incest, paedophilia, child pornography, homosexuality and drugs. In each case an "imaginary menace" is manufactured by "moral entrepreneurs" as a form of "symbolic politics".
In the UK today, based on current fertility rates, we’re heading towards a trajectory where over a third of people will be childless. So even though only 10 per cent actively don’t want children, over 30 per cent will end up without them. This trend has been underway for five decades – though we haven’t been paying attention until now. It takes about two generations before you notice that there aren’t enough children.
Several dozens of innocent kids have already been killed in attempted arsonies against alleged pedophiles. Scores of mistakenly identified innocent people have been attacked, some of them were killed. Lots of kids have died because passers-by were just afraid to get near them or give them a lift. I everybody’s neighbourhood such stories abound.
Myth about underdevelopment
The SWG are pushing the ridiculous MYTH that anyone under 25 is “mentally/neurologically” “undeveloped” and also a child as well. Not only has this myth been proven false, but it doesn’t even make sense in the first place, why would your most important organ that dictates how you function in life, randomly stagnate a third of the way through the average human lifespan and be incapable of any future growth or maturation?
The great majority of the dominant white population in the West believed that black people were inherently less intelligent than white people, to the point of being unable to learn to read and write, and thus deserved to be chattel slaves or prevented from becoming doctors, lawyers, scientists, educators, etc. The fact that black people were not allowed to try and learn how to read and write in the first place helped bolster that once common belief, which was a major case of dirty pool on the part of the majority. Now we know black people are just as intelligent as white people. Today society believes similar things about the intelligence of younger people. But if we gave younger people a chance to prove themselves it is likely that would also prove society is wrong about their perceived intelligence.
Sexology is perhaps more than any other scientific field a matter of ideology and faith. Throughout history, there are countless examples of the conflict between science and faith. Read about the trial of Galileo Galilei when he claimed that the earth went around the sun. When people in power have an interest in maintaining a worldview, the truth — at least in the short term — will always lose. In the year 1616 "the holy inquisition" in Rome made a verdict that characterized the earth's movement around the sun for absurd and heretical.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interesting news from Russia
Erotic model and singer Katya Sambuka, voted the most beautiful woman on the social network ‘VKontakte’ and set to perform at Madonna’s concert in St Petersburg, has appealed to MPs from ‘United Russia’, the ‘Communist Party of the Russian Federation’, ‘Fair Russia’ and the ‘LDPR’ to put forward a legislative initiative to lower the age of sexual consent to 14.
Back in 2010, Alexander Barsukov, Chief Obstetrician and Gynaecologist at the Belarusian Ministry of Health, stated: ‘Here, as in Russia, the AVERAGE AGE AT WHICH GIRLS BEGIN THEIR SEXUAL ACTIVITY IS 14.5 YEARS.’
— HOW OLD ARE THE PARTNERS OF THESE MILLIONS OF UNDERAGE GIRLS? — Sambuka asks, quite reasonably. — I assure you that almost all of them are OF AGE. GIRLS AREN’T ATTRACTED TO THEIR PEERS… WE SLEPT WITH ADULTS, which means WE HAVE A MILLION HIDDEN CRIMINALS (paedophiles)?! And to avoid any absurdity, THE AGE OF SEXUAL CONSENT SHOULD BE LOWERED TO 14, as in CHINA, where there are no problems with the birth rate. Or in AUSTRIA, GERMANY, ITALY, SPAIN, DENMARK, ESTONIA and OTHER CIVILISED COUNTRIES. As a young star with half a million followers on social media, I believe that the authorities should focus on protecting teenagers from abuse, rather than on restricting the rights and freedoms of young people."
Additional thoughts
Again repeating myself, but depending on your age, the country/state you are living in, if you engage it will result in ostracization, physical harm, prison (justice) etc., because you are a normal heterosexual men. It doesn’t make sense that when you were 15 yourself, and attracted to young attractive women, all of the sudden you are supposed to lose that interest just because you get older.
I don’t think there’s anything worse about a 14yo sleeping with a 60yo man than there is with a 14yo girl sleeping with a 15yo boy. The idea that adults are somehow exploiting these teens is absurd to me. Teens can say no and they’re quick to say no when they don’t want something. Actual rape is rape regardless of the age and teenagers are still protected from rape regardless of what the Age of Consent is.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Isn't it high time, my dear young men, to take power in the world in your hands and start marrying girls that you are in love with instead of those imposed upon you by the SWG???
More about the Secret World Government (Bilderberg Group)
The BB's are the most secretive of the three. When the BB's meet, they clear out all people in the buildings where they are to meet, they completely de-bug all the rooms, bring in their own cooks, waiters, housekeepers, heavily armed security guards, etc., and they do not allow outsiders anywhere near the meeting place just before, during, and immediately after they meet.
These very powerful people do not meet to discuss the latest recipe for blueberry pancakes, or the melting rate of snow at the South Pole.
When they meet, they more than likely discuss and decide:
• Wars - They decide when wars should start, how long they should last, when they should end, who will and will not participate, the changes in boundaries of countries resulting from the outcome of these wars, who will lend the money to support the war efforts, and who will lend the money to rebuild the countries after they have been destroyed by war.
• Money - They own the central banks, such as the Federal Reserve System in the US, and similar organizations in all major countries throughout the world, and therefore are in a position to determine discount rates, prime rates, money supply levels, the prices of gold and other precious metals, and very tightly control who and/or what countries should receive loans (guaranteed by the taxpayers of the respective countries, or if that fails, the taxpayers of the US will pay the bills).
If they are successful in loaning money to various nations, the International bankers pocket the profits. If their loans fail, the taxpayers foot the bill.
When they say in the mainstream news media that the US has bailed out Russia, Mexico, Southeast Asian nations, or the like, what they REALLY mean is that the money never left the US, it was just sent to the International bankers on Wall Street who made the loans that failed.
• Governments - They decide who will be allowed to run for the offices of President, Prime Minister, Chancellor, Governor General, or other names applied to the leaders of all major countries around the world.
For example; Bill Clinton attended the 1991 BB meeting in Baden Baden, Germany, so that he could be vetted by the Elite to become the 1992 US president. Tony Blair attended the 1993 BB meeting in Vouliagmeni, Greece, so that he could be grilled by the Elite before becoming Prime Minister of Great Britain, and on and on.
• Stocks, Bonds, & Commodities - Since the Elite own the major banks and the Central banks, they know exactly what interest rates and money supply levels will be, so it is very likely that they regularly run these exchanges up and down to their financial gain.
• News and other information - They directly, or indirectly own all the major news media, and can therefore tell the public exactly what they want them to hear, and deny the public the information they do not want them to see, hear or read. For example; the House of Rothschild bought Routers news service in the 1800's. Within the last 20 years, Routers bought the Associated Press. Now the Elite own the two largest wire services in the world, where most newspapers get their news.
• Wages and salaries - They directly or indirectly own all the major banks, businesses, industries, and the like, and therefore can suppress wages and salaries by either shipping the production jobs to the cheapest labor rates around the world, by importing the technical specialists from the cheapest countries around the world, and by employing mostly temporary and/or part time workers in their home countries. The labor unions do not resist such efforts, because the labor leaders are members of the Elite as well.
I don't know about you, but these above activities seriously concern me, because my children and grandchildren will suffer many times greater than we do today under the control of these EVIL MONSTERS (I have tried to find worse terms for them, but this is the best that I can think of to describe them).
My ancestors finally decided to leave Ireland for the New World in 1772 because of economic suppression. The absentee landlords and money merchants had raised the rents on the tenant farmers of Ireland three times in just one year, and the farmers could no longer afford to ply their trade.
These brave people risked their lives in this new undeveloped land rather than continue to be persecuted by the Elite of that period. The writers of our Constitution took great care in drafting this fine document so as to protect us from Elite (Secret World Government) domination. We are again being conquered by the Elite in ever increasing ways and I, for one, have had enough. The best way to stop this cabal's efforts is "SUNSHINE". Who's Who of the Elite is my spotlight on this grand conspiracy.
You know what am I afraid of most? In about ten years my kids will walk up to me and ask me “Daddy, and where were you when they were taking our freedom from us?” And this question will be worse than death. So… I decided to fight. For the freedom of my children, for the freedom of my grandchildren… And… If you feel the same… Welcome aboard! Join us.
The Secret World Government's objectives in creating the paedofile panic (paedofile hysteria, paedofascism):
1. Keeping slaves' (the population's) minds busy looking for and fearing "pedofiles". So that the sheep do not notice and do not oppose the enslavement process.
2. Enslavement. There are already 6 mln. people on the US Sexual Offenders List (mostly kids texting sexual messages or pics). These people can't live where they want, whey can't get job where they want, they have lots of other restrictions. They are 100% slaves!
3. Young girls are free for the members of the Secret World Government. The members of the SWG are not punished (it's their kingdom, they own these countries, they are the rulers, they control all government institutions). So, they can use girls (boys)(not spoiled or engaged by slaves) for their purposes.
Many people claim that the origin of the paedofascism are feminists. This idea can't be farther from the truth. Nobody would have listened to them. A power, a real government, a real force was required to establish laws and practices prevailing today.
Do you really think that ugly middle-aged fat psychopathic envious hags filled with faeces and hatred wanted to help beautiful young girls who were at the highest levels of happiness being in relations with the most beautiful men with whom they were in love?
You're not that stupid, right? They (so-called feminists) were and are SWG's agents.
Do you really think that independent (of the Secret World Government) politicians (law-makers) would have listened to a gang of hags and put innocent men in jail? Definitely not.
Raising the age of consent is the old agenda of the Secret World Government. As we know, Napoleon was SWG's appointee. (In reality, Napoleon Bonapart, was the first fascist in the empire, and the bourgeois revolutions in France were creations of the Secret World Government (Daniel Estulin's book Bilderberg Club's Secrets)). Right after seizing power, Napoleon (the Secret World Government) established an age of consent law (The French Napoleonic code (the first French constitution of 1791) created the legal context in 1791 when it set the age of consent to 11 years old.) (Not higher yet, to avoid public dissent).
In 1863, France raised the age of consent to 13. In 1945, the age of consent in France was raised to 15.
As the SWG was seizing power in different countries, the SWG would increase the age of consent in those countries.
In Tsarist Russia the age of consent was 10yo. When SWG (represented by bolsheviks) seized power in Russia, they raised the age of consent to 14.
When SWG destroyed the Soviet Union and seized power in the contemporary Russia, it set the age of consent at 18yo. (Present Russia is under full totalitarian control of the SWG (low probability of any revolt). They do with the people there anything they want.)
Now their agenda is to raise it to 30yo. You want to have relations with a girl under 30? Become our slave (go to jail). 21yo is already officially in UN programs. Just wait several years.
The SWG is not raising the aoc abruptly yet because there's still high enough risk of people's revolt. Especially in Germany, UK and France, where people are onto the Secret World Government.
Throughout the entire history of mankind there were maniacs sadists who murdered and raped children. If found, they were inevitably executed. (Which served them right). The law provided very well for such cases. Raising the age of consent contributed absolutely nothing to the reduction of murders and rapes of kids. It contributed well to their increase.
Proofs of the Secret World Government existence:
1. Migrants (people don't want them, but they are encouraged to enter more and more). If politicians were elected, people would have elected politicians who would stop migrants' waves. However, since politicians in western countries are not elected but appointed by the SWG, these politicians do what their owners (SWG) command.
2. Taxes. A truly elected (by people) government would implement people's wishes (one of them is to pay less taxes and leave more money for oneself). Heck no! The SWG would never let worms (people (you, our dear reader)) prevent the SWG from robbing you of your hard earned with blood and sweat money. Whereas they've got enough money for millions of years to come. See how greedy these creatures are! They still plunder you of your pittance.
3. Depriving people of pensions (last prominent example -- pension age raising in France, Russia and other countries).
4. 911 leaves no doubts today as to the involvement and staging by US leaders (the SWG) of the entire affair. 911 was a stupidity, but, at the same time, necessity for the SWG.
Well, maybe not such a stupidity after all. It was stupidity because it revealed and made evident to the public that SWG does exist. It was a necessity because they needed such a catastrophe to impose dictatorship on American people, expanding it to other countries of course.
End so on.
So, the governments are not elected by the population of their countries. It is so f-ng obvious! There can't be a morsel of doubt about that. Which means... Bingo! Someone appoints them.
Listen, those creatures from the SWG are not that hermetically isolated. They have fairly diluted staff (security, cleaners, cooks...) These servants know loooooots of things about the SWG. They talk to them, their kids (heirs) (very blabbering creatures really, divulge lots of stuff) talk to them. That's how we (the authors of these lines) know about it.
People not believing in SWG are either outright stupid or work for the SWG (making believe not believing). Such people are really rare nowadays. Today almost everyone believes in SWG. Just ask. One of the best sources to read about SWG is Daniel Estulin's book Bilderberg Club's Secrets.
Once someone seizes power in a country, it becomes very complicated business to overthrow them. Imagine a person wanted to overthrow Stalin. Slightest suspicion, Stalin just says soldiers to go and shoot the person. Very simple.
Well, now the SWG already controls the majority of countries on this planet. If you try to run an election campaign and you are not one of those appointed by SWG, you either end up on any pretext removed from the elections (law prosecution, accusations, dirt pouring in media), or bribed, or, well, dead. Ask someone from any country of the Western world, you'll hear enough stories of this kind.
In 80s bludgeon approach was yet dangerous for the SWG. There was high risk of people insurgence, finding members (at least some) of the SWG and executing them (like Ceausescu). After 911, after the introduction of the totalitarism into US society, such insurgence is much less probable. Slightest sign and those involved would be in jail in minutes.
Without SWG's control of judges, judges would act reasonably. Lawmakers are not elected, they are appointed. They do what they're told. They pass laws that they were told to pass. Feminists and envious mentally deranged people and maniacal sadists vigilantes couldn't do anything. They just consequences.
You see here exactly why most feminists are not just silent about Third World mass immigration, but very often actively support it. (An order from the Secret World Government).
2. How SWG control people’s minds.
In late eighties Noam Chomsky and Edward Herman, who knew about the Secret World Government’s propaganda and studied its psychological enslaving of the population, wrote in their work Manufacturing Consent about how the Secret World Government manipulates people.
Propaganda does not just aim to send a message; it aims to construct reality as such. This is what Noam Chomsky and Edward Herman, in their analysis of propaganda from the late eighties, defined as “manufacturing of consent”: the process of establishing a normative reality that conforms to specific interests of elite power (Secret World Government). Same things were written by Stanley Cohen in his Folk Devils and Moral Panics, 1972.
“Hurting children is one of the worst things you can say someone is doing. It’s an easy way to demonize your enemy,” says Kathryn Olmsted, a person who studied conspiracy theories, a professor of history at the University of California-Davis.
It´s vital to realize that such hysterias have been promoted over and over again to keep people on the Proper Track. Such ruses have worked very effectively by mobilizing community opinion in favor of vapid, empty concepts like Family Values. Who can be against that? Or Harmony. Who can be against that? Or, as in the child sex abuse hysteria of the day: "Save the Children!" Who can be against that?
"If you´re not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed and loving the people who are doing the oppressing."--Malcolm X.
Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media is a 1988 book by Edward S. Herman and Noam Chomsky.
What is the theory of manufacturing consent?
It argues that the mass communication media of the U.S. "are effective and powerful ideological institutions that carry out a system-supportive propaganda function, by reliance on market forces, internalized assumptions, and self-censorship, and without overt coercion", by means of the propaganda model of communication...
The people with real power are the ones who own the society, which is a pretty narrow group (Secret World Government).
You’ve got to keep the bewildered herd pretty scared (one of the sources of the scare is paedohysteria), because unless they’re properly scared and frightened of all kinds of devils that are going to destroy them from outside or inside or somewhere, they may start to think, which is very dangerous for the Secret World Government. Therefore it’s important to distract them and marginalize them.
In what is nowadays called a totalitarian state, or a military state, it’s easy. You just hold a bludgeon over their heads, and if they get out of line you smash them over the head. But as society has become more free and democratic, you lose that capacity. Therefore you have to turn to the techniques of propaganda. The logic is clear. Propaganda is to a democracy what the bludgeon is to a totalitarian state. That’s wise and good because, again, the common interests elude the bewildered herd. They can’t figure them out.
https://www.highexistence.com/wonder-te ... ered-herd/
The problem with the bewildered herd is that it can never truly be tamed, only contained. And so propaganda – the whip of the lion tamer, the bludgeon of the dictator – must be ever-present. Up to this point, we’ve learned about the prevailing conception of democracy, the first modern uses of propaganda, and the symbiotic relationship between the political class and private power. In the next part, we explore the seven ways propaganda is used and infused in society to numb the herd into reluctant obedience.
Chomsky says if there’s anything the specialized class hates, it’s when the bewildered herd organize themselves into semi-rational units:
“The people in the public relations industry aren’t there for the fun of it. They’re doing work. They’re trying to instill the right values. In fact, they have a conception of what democracy ought to be: It ought to be a system in which the specialized class is trained to work in the service of the masters, the people who own the society (the Secret World Government). The rest of the population ought to be deprived of any form of organization, because organization just causes trouble. They ought to be sitting alone in front of the TV and having drilled into their heads the message, which says, the only value in life is to have more commodities or live like that rich middle class family you’re watching and to have nice values like harmony and Americanism. That’s all there is in life. You may think in your own head that there’s gotta be something more in life than this, but since you’re watching the tube alone you assume, I must be crazy, because that’s all that’s going on over there. And since there is no organization permitted that’s absolutely crucial – you never have a way of finding out whether you are crazy, and you just assume it, because it’s the natural thing to assume.”
A simple example: Webster’s analysis of the British children’s home paedophile panic of the 1980s and 90s, The Secret of Bryn Estyn, launched by direct instructions from the Secret World Government, is one of the great solo investigations. Webster showed that the entire series of episodes, the result of a nation-wide ‘trawling’ by the police for paedophile networks preying on the residents of children’s homes, was a fantasy; the result of sloppy journalism, public officials afraid of being blamed for ignoring a scandal, and lies told by some of the former residents who were motivated by the police promise of large compensation for any abuse. Webster dismantles the whole thing and concludes that many wrongful convictions ensued.
If such panic propagation projects were not launched and fueled by the Secret World Government, never would the nonsense have run as far as it did. Independent journalists would have been more careful, the police and lawyers would have been a bit more sceptical (and more careful).
In Denmark, the Vadstrupgaard case in 1997 where a male kindergarten employee was accused of sexual molestation of several children was one of events staged by the Secret World Government that initiated a paedophile panic in Denmark. The term panic is adequate since the media focused on child professionals and the relevant trade unions together were involved in 133 cases of alleged sexual abuse from 1995 to 2002. Only in two cases were the accused found guilty, showing that the fear of paedophilia had entered into the public imagination on an unprecedented scale.
The issue is … whether we want to live in a free society or whether we want to live under what amounts to “a form of self-imposed totalitarianism, with the bewildered herd marginalized, directed elsewhere, terrified, screaming patriotic slogans, fearing for their lives and admiring with awe the leader who saved them from destruction, while the educated masses goose-step on command and repeat the slogans they’re supposed to repeat and the society deteriorates at home.”
Movie End Game 2007 (about the Secret World Government): "But what they are describing is the complete end of democracy, the end of what matters to people, the end of what happens to the human journey, and for that reason I think this is revolting. The truth of their world government has now been exposed. We know you are ruthless, we know you are evil.”
Did the paedophylic hysteria exist before the propaganda? No. Neither Krafft-Ebing nor Freud nor any of their contemporaries had a lot to say about pedophilia. They didn't consider pedophilia much of a problem, unlike homosexuality, which they wrote a lot about. They were very concerned about homosexuality. At the time, pedophilia was considered only a temporary sexual deviance. Freud considered exclusive pedophilia (sexual attraction exclusively to prepubescent children) something rare, calling it a "sporadic aberration".
Philip Jenkins was a fairly obscure historian until 1996, when reactionary Catholics made him an improbable star. He began his career as a professor of criminal justice at Pennsylvania State University, specializing in the debunking of alleged "crime waves". For criminological journals he wrote four articles on what he considered the unjustified fear of serial murderers in England. In his 1992 book, Intimate Enemies: Moral Panics in Contemporary Great Britain, he broadened his analysis of "constructed" social fears to cover "witch hunts" over Satanism, rape, incest, paedophilia, child pornography, homosexuality and drugs. In each case an "imaginary menace" is manufactured by the Secret World Government ("moral entrepreneurs") as a form of "symbolic politics".
Aggressive, demonising caricatures and slander directed against well-meaning paedophiles are spread by malicious individuals—the media and influential figures with an interest in inciting hatred.
According to sociologist Stanley Cohen, the intensification of deviance usually begins with a focus on some ‘deviant’, typically ‘criminal’, issue. This may concern legal matters relating to sexual orientations that are commonly regarded as immoral.
Now that the media are focusing on the issue, misinformation may begin to spread. Hidden, extreme and marginal cases are being reported and amplified, despite their atypical nature. Reported cases of such deviance are often presented as ‘only those we know about’ or ‘the tip of the iceberg’. This claim sounds alarming, but it is virtually impossible to prove or disprove. Judges and magistrates are then put under pressure by the Secret World Government with the aim of the imposition of harsher sentences. And politicians, acting on the instructions of the Secret World Government, pass tougher laws, giving the impression that they are combating this threat. These reactions by politicians, as a rule, serve to intensify fear within society even further.
This self-reinforcing and self-perpetuating pattern was first documented by Stanley Cohen in his book Demons of the People and Moral Panic.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
How SWG make innocent people seem to be rapists and murderers of children
The SWG’s main objective here was to mix innocent people with real criminals (murderers and rapist of children). Mark, SWG dogs never (never!!!) use the word “murderer” or “rapist” of children. No! They always use the word “pedophile”. This is how the SWG propaganda professionals taught them. And there is a serious reason for this.
This way they mingle real predators, real monsters, real murderers and rapists of kids (whose psychological portrait is fully identical with those of the members of the SWG) with, for example, an innocent 25yo fella who is desperately in love with a 15yo girl, who, in turn, is desperately in love with him. Or a beautiful 30yo man who chatted about sex with 14yo girls who liked him a lot. Or kids texting about sex with each other or sending naked pictures of themselves.
Murders and rapes of kids are relatively rare, so, the SWG, to blow up the panic and sow fear, had to widen the scale of those to be feared, calling them the all-encompassing word “pedofiles”.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Secret World Government intentionally propagate kids’ suicides
After the Secret World Government imposed laws prohibiting online sexual chats where minors actively participated, an abrupt increase in kids' suicides was observed. Did the Secret World Government know, that their actions will launch tremendous waves of youth's suicides? Yes, they did. Did they do it on purpose? Definitely. They did it on purpose. They are very, very bloodthirsty. They enjoy torturing and murdering people a lot.
Although ‘DANGER’ signs have been posted all over the corners of cyberspace, the online world is actually one of the safest places to explore one’s sexuality. If a young woman is keen to test her ‘keyboard skills’ in cybersex, she can experiment with sexual positions and fantasies without worrying about pregnancy, or even, for the most part, about getting emotionally involved. If things get ‘too hot’, she can politely take her leave or simply block an overly passionate suitor... If things get ‘too hot’, she can politely take her leave or simply brush off an overly eager suitor.
Here is a typical portrait of the paedocrites (this is a scientific study):
In many societies dominated by traditional, sexually repressive values, there is no shortage of rape, murder and the like. In this context, it is instructive to consider the views of the most scarred victims of our society: the criminally insane. Hans Eysenck’s book *Sex and Personality* presents a remarkable study of 186 patients at Broadmoor Hospital, the UK’s leading institution for criminally insane individuals. 3% of them had been admitted under Section 26 of the *Mental Health Act*, whilst the remainder had been convicted of the following:
16% sexual offences (rape)
11% arson
26% murder (whether intentional or unintentional)
28% attempted murder and causing bodily harm
16% robbery and property offences.
One might have expected that the views on sexuality expressed within such a group would reveal something that conservatives would immediately deem appallingly wrong—a failure to embrace traditional values. Far from it. On the contrary, it turned out that these values had been embraced all too well:
Broadmoor patients are, on the whole, far more sexually inhibited than the ‘normal’ group. Consequently, they find it more difficult to become sexually aroused; they rarely think about sex; they consciously try to banish thoughts of sex from their minds; and when they do experience strong sexual feelings, they are unable to express them; do not think about sex every day; claim that they find it very difficult to become aroused; view sex merely as a means of reproduction rather than a way of deriving pleasure; sex is not particularly important to them; they are not aroused by the thought of an affair.
They draw clear distinctions between what constitutes appropriate and inappropriate sexual behaviour; they find the sight of animals copulating repulsive; there are things they would never do with anyone; they find the idea of a sexual orgy repulsive; they do not believe that, in some cases, a woman can be sexually aggressive; They prefer to have sex under the covers in the dark; they would not want to scratch or bite their sexual partners; they object to the use of four-letter words in the company of people of the opposite sex; they consider wife-swapping to be indecent; they find certain forms of lovemaking repulsive.
They hold very conservative views on the subject of sexuality:
They are not interested in the possibility of seeing someone naked; they will protect their children from being exposed to sex; they will not take the opportunity to watch others having sex; they are against the unrestricted publication of pornographic stories; they believe in sexual censorship; their morality is unambiguous and straightforward; they believe that sexual liberation undermines society; they do not consider sexual play between children to be harmless; they believe it is right for a man to dominate.
But they are no longer merely potential offenders; they are criminals who have committed heinous crimes! And yet there are still so many serial killers at large who have not yet committed any crimes or been caught! But we now know their typical psychological profile!
Now where are vigilante gangs from? Maniacs (sadists) obtained a right to torture and murder innocent people impunibly(!!!) That is where the vigilante gangs are from.
How many of those sadists went to look for a missing child? We'll tell you the official statistics: none of them. Finding a missing child or saving someone just does not give the sadists satisfaction. That's why.
Far from it. Lots of times the real raper or murderer of a kid turns out to be a boisterous anti-paedo vigilante. (And what else did you expect from a sadist?)
Facts are a stubborn thing. The facts and the statistics rigidly demonstrate that rapes and murders of kids are committed not by minor attracted persons, but by persons with standard sexual orientation preferring grown-up sexual partners. Frequently they are under the influence of alcohol and frequently they become “opportunity rapists or murderers”, i.e. when an opportunity to kill or rape presents itself (darkness, absence of other people nearby, etc.)
Whereas MAPs’ love towards children is sincere and lacking any desire to inflict harm. Children feel it very well. Kids’ senses work as very good radars. Otherwise they wouldn’t let MAPs near themselves and loving MAPs would never be able to win children’s confidence.
There are grounds for believing that the aggressive, sexist objectification of girls as sexual objects is predominantly characteristic of men with a ‘standard’ sexual orientation who prefer adult women. These offenders often have a tendency to break the law in non-sexual contexts as well. At the time of the offence, they are often drunk and, whilst at home, use the child as an accessible and defenceless substitute for the adult partner they prefer.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sex educator and investigative journalist, Judith Levine, writes in her 2002 book Harmful to Minors: The Perils of Protecting Children from Sex, “Projecting sexual menace onto a cardboard monster and pouring money and energy into vanquishing him distracts adults from teaching children the subtle skills of loving with both trust and discrimination.”
Judith Levine's book Harmful to Minors: The Perils of Protecting Children from Sex is based upon the premise, “for our part, adults owe children not only protection and a schooling in safety but also the entitlement to pleasure.” (Levine and Elders, 2003).
There is probably more baby rape going on as a result of paedohysteria. Society doesn't distinguish between what is normal (i.e. to find teenagers sexually attractive) and what is not normal (desire to rape babies). Both are defined as 'paedophilia'. If you define millions of ordinary men as paedophiles, unfortunately some of them are going to take that label and run with it.
Creating too much attention and drama around it *could* serve to give already 'unhinged' or mentally disturbed persons ideas or fuel their 'fantasies' e.g how can I plump the lowest depths or break the biggest taboo's (clearly there are disturbed people out there thinking along those lines).
So I think making the public aware is one thing, but creating excessive drama and hysteria around it *could* cause problems - as you do often get 'copy cat' criminals - looking for any kind of attention by trying to plump what they perhaps view as the depths of depravity.
Families become distrustful of one another, watching out for signs of abuse. Parents distrust teachers and doctors. These professionals, in turn, spy on parents. Fear of child sex abuse is one of the most acute problems of a society that is dissolving in mistrust and panic, where our most basic social bond, the love of a child, can be turned inside out into a fear and hatred of others. Fear of the predatory abuser fixes upon a potential danger. Of course parents should take any reasonable precautions, but at a certain point, the fear itself can become the most destructive thing in life.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Secret World Government uses paedofile hysteria to enslave young children
Children who create and send sexually explicit messages of themselves electronically will be breaking the law in Rhode Island, after a new Bill was signed this week.
Under the new measure, anyone below the age of 18 who creates and sends a sexually inappropriate image of themselves can be charged with a “status” offence. Such offences are acts which are only considered criminal when committed by a young person. Even tougher penalties can be handed out to those who possess or forward sexually explicit images of another young person. Such an action can be prosecuted under the state’s child pornography laws and if convicted the person may have to register as a sex offender.
Got that? To protect children from sex offenders, it's necessary to label children as ... sex offenders.
And I'd call having underage kids on a sex offenders register (SWG’s slaves list) for life classes as pretty bloody damaging for the kids they profess to be protecting.
Requiring a boy to answer unconditionally for everything he does, while concurrently insisting that he is not capable of making his own choices, sexual or otherwise, is both illogical and grossly unfair. Boys today have many sources of reliable information about sex, and therefore should not be dismissed as not having the background to make rational decisions in this area. A boy of 12 currently cannot legally consent to what he judges to be harmless sexual activities, but he can be held fully accountable, tried, and convicted of, for example, "sending a sexually inappropriate image of themselves". Hypocrites.
The crimes we are talking about can be both this and that. Dagbladet [a Norwegian newspaper, the heading reads "Risks prison after smacking butts"] reported that two boys of 13 from Oregon risked juvenile prison and registration as sex offenders after slapping girls' asses at their school. A girl of 14 could be charged with distribution of child pornography after posting nude pictures of herself. Posting pictures is called sexting and has become a way for young people to express their sexuality. Here we can read about the legal antics that occurred when a 13 year old girl was at the same time tried as a perpetrator and a victim in the same trial (was dangerous and in danger), revealing in its own way the immense hypocrisy involved whenever children and sexuality is a topic.
Now, dear reader, do you really think the Secret World Government imposed the paedohysteria to protect kids? Far from it. The SWG imposed it to enslave our children! Kids on the Sexual Offenders List can’t choose where to live, they can’t choose where to work, lots of other restrictions… They’re already slaves!
You may think that all these strict sex laws make the US the safest country in the world for children to grow up in. You think wrong. Safe childhood in the United States is defined in a very special way. The US Justice Department created a project called Project Safe Childhood. If we read a little on the website of this project, we quickly discover that child safety is a matter of safety from sex. This is perhaps not surprising, in a country that until recently did not give their own children a health service that we in Norway take for granted.
My own attempts to get to the bottom of the matter made me view these reports with suspicion, and my doubts only grew when I received frantic phone calls from parents and grandparents whose children and grandchildren were facing accusations in similar situations. In 1999, a single mother from Long Island (New York City) tracked me down to ask for help for her thirteen-year-old son, Adam, who had been accused of ‘sexual rubbing’ against his eleven-year-old sister (she had previously boasted about her sexual experiences to her friends, and then persuaded them to report him to the school psychologist). Adam was arrested, handcuffed, and threatened with trial as an adult on felony charges, and then placed in a strict Catholic institution (he was Jewish by faith) to undergo a compulsory rehabilitation programme for juvenile sex offenders, from which he was released on parole a year later on the condition that he would undergo outpatient treatment for at least another year. A grandmother from Michigan told me over the phone, in tears, that a facility for sex offenders had refused to release her eleven-year-old grandson because he refused to admit to a crime which, as he insisted, he had not committed. “They kept saying he was in denial, meaning that the treatment, they said, wasn’t working. So they just kept him behind bars.” Four years later, in the mid-1990s, according to my grandmother, the boy took his own life (may you all rot in hell, you damned paedophile fascists, destroyers of children; and your whole gang).
No less important than these personal tragedies affecting specific children is the effect this trend has on all children, including those who will never come anywhere near a child protection agency or a juvenile detention centre. Tony’s story is a specific example of the gradual pathologisation of normative childhood sexuality, that is, the behaviour exhibited by the majority of children. This has implications not only for behaviour deemed ‘deviant’, but also for the sexual behaviour of all children. Every time a new category of sexual deviation is defined—or, rather, invented—the entire scale of so-called normal behaviour is shifted several notches to the right. The views of both professionals and laypeople regarding what is acceptable for children, teenagers and their families are shifting towards a more conservative, more fearful and more restrictive stance, moving away from tolerance, humour and trust.
The word ‘normal’ is not a precise scientific term. It can refer to what most people do, or to what some people consider to be healthy, moral, customary or natural, as opposed to what is unhealthy, sinful, strange or unnatural. It could mean what my mum, my priest or a psychologist on Oprah Winfrey’s talk show considers acceptable. Or it could mean what I personally consider acceptable. What is ‘normal’ is extremely subject to change with every shift in the political and historical winds.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Age of Consent
The Age of Consent: We have no data to show that our increasingly restrictive age of consent laws – many of which will now make consensual activity between age-group peers a serious criminal offense that could end up slapping one partner with lifelong sex offender status – are beneficial to our youth or to our culture. Age of consent laws do not provide a meaningful deterrent to rape, sexual molestation or sexual abuse.
We have no evidence that Age of Consent laws assist in decreasing in teen pregnancy or STD/STI infection rates. Teen pregnancy and STD/STI rates in other countries Denmark and Sweden, for instance, or Japan, France, or Germany – where comprehensive sex education, social and medical support for sexually active teens, and less restrictive age of consent laws, are far lower. It’s astounding to us that the United States government (dictated by the Secret World Government) can look at the facts and still keep pushing abstinence-only sex education and “child-protective” (especially given that young adults are not children) sexual laws as it does. We clearly care a whole lot less for the actual health, happiness, and well-being of our youth than we do for a given set of mores.
The Secret World Government seek to extend “childhood” into the mid-20s in an effort to obtain more control.
Read this article: https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/adultho ... 37174.html
I wish I could say this is a joke but it isn’t. We are moving from the “teen brain” to the “adolescent brain” and adolescence is now looking to be extended into the mid-20s. Too bad adolescence itself is a nonsense concept. For more info you can read this article: http://drrobertepstein.com/pdf/Epstein-THE_MYTH_OF_THE_TEEN_BRAINScientific_American_Mind-4-07.pdf?lbisphpreq=1
Then if you want even more info, read Epstein’s book “Teen 2.0”. He explains better than I can the myth of the “teen brain”. This applies to this new push to extend adolescence into the 20s. I will say this: the argument used is often based around frontal lobe development which people claim (after reading pop-science articles) only becomes “fully-developed” at 25. Problem is that isn’t how it works. The frontal lobe stops developing around 25 and begins to decline slowly until death. A person’s decision making ability has less to do with time based brain development and more to do with experience based brain development. Look at it like this, a child raised in the wilderness will not develop human language. When that child is found as an adult they will never be able to truly develop language, no matter how old they get. The lack of experience and use severely stunted the language parts of the brain. It works similar with the frontal lobe. Our modern culture keeps kids in bubbles. Prevents them from taking real responsibilities or risks. They make no real decisions and their frontal lobe is stimulated minimally, slowing its development and weakening the reasoning abilities of humans. This is why, as Epstein points out, teens from other cultures are often more mature and responsible than young adults of our culture. Those teens are given responsibilities and aren’t treated like toddlers. Now “researchers” and “scientists” want infantilization to apply to young adults. This is insanity. Why is this being pushed? Control. Suddenly, mandatory public education will extend for four years of “free” college. Further dumbing down out population and indoctrinating people to be even more complacent and accepting of statist control. After all, people are “adolescent” until they hit 25. No doubt the age of consent will raise to, further criminalizing male sexuality and forcing men to only legally being able to go for older women.
Get ready folks. You have heard how some people say liking 16-18 year old people is pedophilia? That’s gonna bump up to 23-25 year old people.
Parents and young people are routinely arrested and charged for merely having nude photos of themselves or other minors.
It’s funny, people really are noticing that child porn laws are nonsense, but the state doesn’t want to lose its easy money and easy avenue to convince people to give up privacy and freedom. The Secret World Government is a leviathan. Child porn is an easy way for it to give itself power and take it away from the people.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Now the Secret World Government put us in a situation where rebels of genuine courage, many long-dead, are utterly vilified for having spoken that which was so obviously true, while hateful, emotionally unstable, misandrists are lionized for their viciousness and sanctimonious cruelty;
Sexual stigmatisation is not new (many of those forced to bear the Pink Triangle were artists, poets, intellectuals, but all were someone’s son, someone’s daughter) but it has undoubtedly been given a new lease of life in our new, enlightened, post-Nazi age of paedohysteria. Terrence White, whose beautiful, moving article sponsored this little outburst, is one man who – with incalculable courage and inestimable ethical strength – is daring to resist the new fascists in our midst: sexual fascists. That he has been labelled a ‘paedo’ by these frightening bigots (frightening because they have so much unopposed power) is all the more reason to honour his heroism: he will not be silenced, no matter what the Infallible Guardians of Public Morality throw at him.
It is a true perversion that the honourable cause of protecting the vulnerable and powerless from exploitation has become a front for paranoid and merciless extremists, who now make lucrative careers out of knowingly destroying the lives of talented and valuable men like Terrence White, who I know would rather harm himself than harm a child.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A femihag is not competing in any way with young white girls for African migrants. She couldn’t care if African migrants are harassing or raping young white girls and women.
If a 15yo girl chooses a 35yo male... well, that definitely means that she finds him much much looooots of times much more attractive than anyone from her same age compeers. Feminists (sexually unsatisfied envious fat and ugly creatures (zombies)) are extremely jealous and angry (and envious of other people's happiness). Most definitely they would be accusing the poor fella and the poor young girlie.
Now, what we’ve got:
Female hypoagency. The demonization of male sexuality. Paedohysteria. Misandry. The false rape accusation epidemics. Victimeless crimes. The age-of-consent scam. Seventeen year-old "children". The sexual trade-union. Youthism. Children as a mean of extortion. Male disposability. The myth of sex-trafficking. The rescue industry. Female victimhood. The donation racket.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
An anonymous individual named “hfghf” asked my opinion on this article: http://metro.co.uk/2017/10/27/teenage-girls-want-relationships-with-older-men-thats-why-its-theirresponsibility-to-say-no-7032490/amp/ In it, the author admits teen girls like older men, but comes to near insane conclusions as to why and demands that men must say no (and continue to seek relationships with older females, I wonder why….nothing to do with her age being around the 30s….) I might not like it, you might like it, and we might all wish that it wasn’t true, but the thing is, teenage girls do fancy older men. They do desire them. They do indeed. In fact, females in general like older males. From preteens to adults. There are biological reasons for this.
I attended an all girl Catholic boarding school where there was, as you can imagine, sweet FA in terms of male attention to be had. I had always assumed that man-drought was the reason that most of us developed a passionate crush on a teacher at some point in our school career. But having spoken to women who were raised in slightly less bizarre circumstances, I’ve revised that assumption. It’s not just girls who go to school in the middle of nowhere with no boys to flirt with who form passionate romantic obsessions with male teachers. It happens at every school, in every town, all over the world.
Don’t we all have that friend who dated an ‘older’ guy when she was at school? I have more stories than I can count of sneaking out of school to meet up with men in their twenties and thirties.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Secret World Government are reducing our population
Everything is very simple: people are just afraid to have children. Yes, because of the paedophile panic blown to these proportions by the Secret World Government.
In reality, parents who batter their children are thankfully rare. But parents who sexually abuse their children are even rarer. Sexual offences against children are thankfully very rare, but of those offences, the vast majority are committed not by strangers, but by family members or close friends. “Paedophile” is a stereotype that does not describe the acts of incest that characterize most sex offences against children.
Virtually every person in our countries was brought up in a family, and virtually every one of them brought up with love and care. Such sexual abuse that does occur generally occurs in the family, but it is still extremely rare.
“Falling birth rates are the greatest crisis facing humanity – bar none,” Stephen J.Philip Jenkins was a fairly obscure historian until 1996, when reactionary Catholics made him an improbable star. He began his career as a professor of criminal justice at Pennsylvania State University, specialising in the debunking of alleged "crime waves". For criminological journals he wrote four articles on what he considered the unjustified fear of serial murderers in England. In his 1992 book, Intimate Enemies: Moral Panics in Contemporary Great Britain, he broadened his analysis of "constructed" social fears to cover "witch hunts" over Satanism, rape, incest, paedophilia, child pornography, homosexuality and drugs. In each case an "imaginary menace" is manufactured by "moral entrepreneurs" as a form of "symbolic politics".
In the UK today, based on current fertility rates, we’re heading towards a trajectory where over a third of people will be childless. So even though only 10 per cent actively don’t want children, over 30 per cent will end up without them. This trend has been underway for five decades – though we haven’t been paying attention until now. It takes about two generations before you notice that there aren’t enough children.
Several dozens of innocent kids have already been killed in attempted arsonies against alleged pedophiles. Scores of mistakenly identified innocent people have been attacked, some of them were killed. Lots of kids have died because passers-by were just afraid to get near them or give them a lift. I everybody’s neighbourhood such stories abound.
Myth about underdevelopment
The SWG are pushing the ridiculous MYTH that anyone under 25 is “mentally/neurologically” “undeveloped” and also a child as well. Not only has this myth been proven false, but it doesn’t even make sense in the first place, why would your most important organ that dictates how you function in life, randomly stagnate a third of the way through the average human lifespan and be incapable of any future growth or maturation?
The great majority of the dominant white population in the West believed that black people were inherently less intelligent than white people, to the point of being unable to learn to read and write, and thus deserved to be chattel slaves or prevented from becoming doctors, lawyers, scientists, educators, etc. The fact that black people were not allowed to try and learn how to read and write in the first place helped bolster that once common belief, which was a major case of dirty pool on the part of the majority. Now we know black people are just as intelligent as white people. Today society believes similar things about the intelligence of younger people. But if we gave younger people a chance to prove themselves it is likely that would also prove society is wrong about their perceived intelligence.
Sexology is perhaps more than any other scientific field a matter of ideology and faith. Throughout history, there are countless examples of the conflict between science and faith. Read about the trial of Galileo Galilei when he claimed that the earth went around the sun. When people in power have an interest in maintaining a worldview, the truth — at least in the short term — will always lose. In the year 1616 "the holy inquisition" in Rome made a verdict that characterized the earth's movement around the sun for absurd and heretical.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interesting news from Russia
Erotic model and singer Katya Sambuka, voted the most beautiful woman on the social network ‘VKontakte’ and set to perform at Madonna’s concert in St Petersburg, has appealed to MPs from ‘United Russia’, the ‘Communist Party of the Russian Federation’, ‘Fair Russia’ and the ‘LDPR’ to put forward a legislative initiative to lower the age of sexual consent to 14.
Back in 2010, Alexander Barsukov, Chief Obstetrician and Gynaecologist at the Belarusian Ministry of Health, stated: ‘Here, as in Russia, the AVERAGE AGE AT WHICH GIRLS BEGIN THEIR SEXUAL ACTIVITY IS 14.5 YEARS.’
— HOW OLD ARE THE PARTNERS OF THESE MILLIONS OF UNDERAGE GIRLS? — Sambuka asks, quite reasonably. — I assure you that almost all of them are OF AGE. GIRLS AREN’T ATTRACTED TO THEIR PEERS… WE SLEPT WITH ADULTS, which means WE HAVE A MILLION HIDDEN CRIMINALS (paedophiles)?! And to avoid any absurdity, THE AGE OF SEXUAL CONSENT SHOULD BE LOWERED TO 14, as in CHINA, where there are no problems with the birth rate. Or in AUSTRIA, GERMANY, ITALY, SPAIN, DENMARK, ESTONIA and OTHER CIVILISED COUNTRIES. As a young star with half a million followers on social media, I believe that the authorities should focus on protecting teenagers from abuse, rather than on restricting the rights and freedoms of young people."
Additional thoughts
Again repeating myself, but depending on your age, the country/state you are living in, if you engage it will result in ostracization, physical harm, prison (justice) etc., because you are a normal heterosexual men. It doesn’t make sense that when you were 15 yourself, and attracted to young attractive women, all of the sudden you are supposed to lose that interest just because you get older.
I don’t think there’s anything worse about a 14yo sleeping with a 60yo man than there is with a 14yo girl sleeping with a 15yo boy. The idea that adults are somehow exploiting these teens is absurd to me. Teens can say no and they’re quick to say no when they don’t want something. Actual rape is rape regardless of the age and teenagers are still protected from rape regardless of what the Age of Consent is.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Isn't it high time, my dear young men, to take power in the world in your hands and start marrying girls that you are in love with instead of those imposed upon you by the SWG???
More about the Secret World Government (Bilderberg Group)
The BB's are the most secretive of the three. When the BB's meet, they clear out all people in the buildings where they are to meet, they completely de-bug all the rooms, bring in their own cooks, waiters, housekeepers, heavily armed security guards, etc., and they do not allow outsiders anywhere near the meeting place just before, during, and immediately after they meet.
These very powerful people do not meet to discuss the latest recipe for blueberry pancakes, or the melting rate of snow at the South Pole.
When they meet, they more than likely discuss and decide:
• Wars - They decide when wars should start, how long they should last, when they should end, who will and will not participate, the changes in boundaries of countries resulting from the outcome of these wars, who will lend the money to support the war efforts, and who will lend the money to rebuild the countries after they have been destroyed by war.
• Money - They own the central banks, such as the Federal Reserve System in the US, and similar organizations in all major countries throughout the world, and therefore are in a position to determine discount rates, prime rates, money supply levels, the prices of gold and other precious metals, and very tightly control who and/or what countries should receive loans (guaranteed by the taxpayers of the respective countries, or if that fails, the taxpayers of the US will pay the bills).
If they are successful in loaning money to various nations, the International bankers pocket the profits. If their loans fail, the taxpayers foot the bill.
When they say in the mainstream news media that the US has bailed out Russia, Mexico, Southeast Asian nations, or the like, what they REALLY mean is that the money never left the US, it was just sent to the International bankers on Wall Street who made the loans that failed.
• Governments - They decide who will be allowed to run for the offices of President, Prime Minister, Chancellor, Governor General, or other names applied to the leaders of all major countries around the world.
For example; Bill Clinton attended the 1991 BB meeting in Baden Baden, Germany, so that he could be vetted by the Elite to become the 1992 US president. Tony Blair attended the 1993 BB meeting in Vouliagmeni, Greece, so that he could be grilled by the Elite before becoming Prime Minister of Great Britain, and on and on.
• Stocks, Bonds, & Commodities - Since the Elite own the major banks and the Central banks, they know exactly what interest rates and money supply levels will be, so it is very likely that they regularly run these exchanges up and down to their financial gain.
• News and other information - They directly, or indirectly own all the major news media, and can therefore tell the public exactly what they want them to hear, and deny the public the information they do not want them to see, hear or read. For example; the House of Rothschild bought Routers news service in the 1800's. Within the last 20 years, Routers bought the Associated Press. Now the Elite own the two largest wire services in the world, where most newspapers get their news.
• Wages and salaries - They directly or indirectly own all the major banks, businesses, industries, and the like, and therefore can suppress wages and salaries by either shipping the production jobs to the cheapest labor rates around the world, by importing the technical specialists from the cheapest countries around the world, and by employing mostly temporary and/or part time workers in their home countries. The labor unions do not resist such efforts, because the labor leaders are members of the Elite as well.
I don't know about you, but these above activities seriously concern me, because my children and grandchildren will suffer many times greater than we do today under the control of these EVIL MONSTERS (I have tried to find worse terms for them, but this is the best that I can think of to describe them).
My ancestors finally decided to leave Ireland for the New World in 1772 because of economic suppression. The absentee landlords and money merchants had raised the rents on the tenant farmers of Ireland three times in just one year, and the farmers could no longer afford to ply their trade.
These brave people risked their lives in this new undeveloped land rather than continue to be persecuted by the Elite of that period. The writers of our Constitution took great care in drafting this fine document so as to protect us from Elite (Secret World Government) domination. We are again being conquered by the Elite in ever increasing ways and I, for one, have had enough. The best way to stop this cabal's efforts is "SUNSHINE". Who's Who of the Elite is my spotlight on this grand conspiracy.
You know what am I afraid of most? In about ten years my kids will walk up to me and ask me “Daddy, and where were you when they were taking our freedom from us?” And this question will be worse than death. So… I decided to fight. For the freedom of my children, for the freedom of my grandchildren… And… If you feel the same… Welcome aboard! Join us.