Page 1 of 1
A common constitutional argument against sex offender registry laws is, was and always will be the 14th amendment
Posted: Sat May 23, 2026 12:26 am
by Adge
Why don't pedophiles receive the same protections as other sexual minorities federally? If you kill someone who never hurt kids but was a pedophile, there are no hate crime enhancements they can add.
Re: A common constitutional argument against sex offender registry laws is, was and always will be the 14th amendment
Posted: Wed May 27, 2026 1:58 pm
by DANAT4T
I've probably a little bit too radical on this but I don't care about hate crime laws. I don't want protection but as I said I probably am a bit too radical on this. I believe that human trafficking should be legal. I am not ashamed to be a radical libertarian MAP.
Re: A common constitutional argument against sex offender registry laws is, was and always will be the 14th amendment
Posted: Wed May 27, 2026 5:07 pm
by JGHeaven
DANAT4T wrote: Wed May 27, 2026 1:58 pm
I've probably a little bit too radical on this but I don't care about hate crime laws. I don't want protection but as I said I probably am a bit too radical on this. I believe that human trafficking should be legal. I am not ashamed to be a radical libertarian MAP.
Maybe it should be.
We are all slaves in a way. There is the term debt slave which applied to most people. We work long hours in jobs we hate because we have to, we have debts and commitments which leave us with no choice. I have read that even in ancient Israel, there were debt slaves, who had to work as a slave because they had debts and commitments, so it wasn't really that much different. God had no problem with this, he even gave advice on good slave treatment. So if God has no problem with slavery and we are all slaves under a modern fluffy branding, can we take a shocked hard view against other types of slavery and human trafficking?
It is wrong in a sense, but not really that much more wrong than what we have today. It is just what we're accustomed to. In ancient Israel I doubt anyone had moral problems with slavery, it was normal, even good, helping people to serve a purpose. It's easy to say it's wrong today, while ignoring our situation. In the future I am sure that people will look back to today and be shocked of what we thought was good and bad.
Re: A common constitutional argument against sex offender registry laws is, was and always will be the 14th amendment
Posted: Wed May 27, 2026 5:34 pm
by DANAT4T
JGHeaven wrote: Wed May 27, 2026 5:07 pm
DANAT4T wrote: Wed May 27, 2026 1:58 pm
I've probably a little bit too radical on this but I don't care about hate crime laws. I don't want protection but as I said I probably am a bit too radical on this. I believe that human trafficking should be legal. I am not ashamed to be a radical libertarian MAP.
Maybe it should be.
We are all slaves in a way. There is the term debt slave which applied to most people. We work long hours in jobs we hate because we have to, we have debts and commitments which leave us with no choice. I have read that even in ancient Israel, there were debt slaves, who had to work as a slave because they had debts and commitments, so it wasn't really that much different. God had no problem with this, he even gave advice on good slave treatment. So if God has no problem with slavery and we are all slaves under a modern fluffy branding, can we take a shocked hard view against other types of slavery and human trafficking?
It is wrong in a sense, but not really that much more wrong than what we have today. It is just what we're accustomed to. In ancient Israel I doubt anyone had moral problems with slavery, it was normal, even good, helping people to serve a purpose. It's easy to say it's wrong today, while ignoring our situation. In the future I am sure that people will look back to today and be shocked of what we thought was good and bad.
Human trafficking definitely should be legal. Why is the state entitled to view humans as superior to other animals. Why is the state entitled to view profit from human trafficking as inferior to other labour. I will paraphrase Andrew Jackson. They have those views because they are a den of vipers.
Re: A common constitutional argument against sex offender registry laws is, was and always will be the 14th amendment
Posted: Fri May 29, 2026 7:23 am
by Walton
DANAT4T wrote: Wed May 27, 2026 5:34 pm
JGHeaven wrote: Wed May 27, 2026 5:07 pm
DANAT4T wrote: Wed May 27, 2026 1:58 pm
I've probably a little bit too radical on this but I don't care about hate crime laws. I don't want protection but as I said I probably am a bit too radical on this. I believe that human trafficking should be legal. I am not ashamed to be a radical libertarian MAP.
Maybe it should be.
We are all slaves in a way. There is the term debt slave which applied to most people. We work long hours in jobs we hate because we have to, we have debts and commitments which leave us with no choice. I have read that even in ancient Israel, there were debt slaves, who had to work as a slave because they had debts and commitments, so it wasn't really that much different. God had no problem with this, he even gave advice on good slave treatment. So if God has no problem with slavery and we are all slaves under a modern fluffy branding, can we take a shocked hard view against other types of slavery and human trafficking?
It is wrong in a sense, but not really that much more wrong than what we have today. It is just what we're accustomed to. In ancient Israel I doubt anyone had moral problems with slavery, it was normal, even good, helping people to serve a purpose. It's easy to say it's wrong today, while ignoring our situation. In the future I am sure that people will look back to today and be shocked of what we thought was good and bad.
Human trafficking definitely should be legal. Why is the state entitled to view humans as superior to other animals. Why is the state entitled to view profit from human trafficking as inferior to other labour. I will paraphrase Andrew Jackson. They have those views because they are a den of vipers.
I have even wilder opinions but many thinks it's just kinks but no
Re: A common constitutional argument against sex offender registry laws is, was and always will be the 14th amendment
Posted: Fri May 29, 2026 8:36 am
by DANAT4T
Walton wrote: Fri May 29, 2026 7:23 am
DANAT4T wrote: Wed May 27, 2026 5:34 pm
JGHeaven wrote: Wed May 27, 2026 5:07 pm
Maybe it should be.
We are all slaves in a way. There is the term debt slave which applied to most people. We work long hours in jobs we hate because we have to, we have debts and commitments which leave us with no choice. I have read that even in ancient Israel, there were debt slaves, who had to work as a slave because they had debts and commitments, so it wasn't really that much different. God had no problem with this, he even gave advice on good slave treatment. So if God has no problem with slavery and we are all slaves under a modern fluffy branding, can we take a shocked hard view against other types of slavery and human trafficking?
It is wrong in a sense, but not really that much more wrong than what we have today. It is just what we're accustomed to. In ancient Israel I doubt anyone had moral problems with slavery, it was normal, even good, helping people to serve a purpose. It's easy to say it's wrong today, while ignoring our situation. In the future I am sure that people will look back to today and be shocked of what we thought was good and bad.
Human trafficking definitely should be legal. Why is the state entitled to view humans as superior to other animals. Why is the state entitled to view profit from human trafficking as inferior to other labour. I will paraphrase Andrew Jackson. They have those views because they are a den of vipers.
I have even wilder opinions but many thinks it's just kinks but no
You mean kinks like sharing your personal details on social media platforms.

Re: A common constitutional argument against sex offender registry laws is, was and always will be the 14th amendment
Posted: Mon Jun 01, 2026 11:42 pm
by Aspire6
Because people think that it somehow normalizes sex with children, so they get violent when you suggest something so radical as not hating someone for something they had no control over having in the first place.
Re: A common constitutional argument against sex offender registry laws is, was and always will be the 14th amendment
Posted: Fri Jun 05, 2026 3:55 pm
by Walton
DANAT4T wrote: Fri May 29, 2026 8:36 am
Walton wrote: Fri May 29, 2026 7:23 am
DANAT4T wrote: Wed May 27, 2026 5:34 pm
Human trafficking definitely should be legal. Why is the state entitled to view humans as superior to other animals. Why is the state entitled to view profit from human trafficking as inferior to other labour. I will paraphrase Andrew Jackson. They have those views because they are a den of vipers.
I have even wilder opinions but many thinks it's just kinks but no
You mean kinks like sharing your personal details on social media platforms.
Yes

and admitting things not joking
Re: A common constitutional argument against sex offender registry laws is, was and always will be the 14th amendment
Posted: Tue Jun 09, 2026 7:49 am
by Artaxerxes II
JGHeaven wrote: Wed May 27, 2026 5:07 pm
DANAT4T wrote: Wed May 27, 2026 1:58 pm
I've probably a little bit too radical on this but I don't care about hate crime laws. I don't want protection but as I said I probably am a bit too radical on this. I believe that human trafficking should be legal. I am not ashamed to be a radical libertarian MAP.
Maybe it should be.
We are all slaves in a way. There is the term debt slave which applied to most people. We work long hours in jobs we hate because we have to, we have debts and commitments which leave us with no choice. I have read that even in ancient Israel, there were debt slaves, who had to work as a slave because they had debts and commitments, so it wasn't really that much different. God had no problem with this, he even gave advice on good slave treatment. So if God has no problem with slavery and we are all slaves under a modern fluffy branding, can we take a shocked hard view against other types of slavery and human trafficking?
It is wrong in a sense, but not really that much more wrong than what we have today. It is just what we're accustomed to. In ancient Israel I doubt anyone had moral problems with slavery, it was normal, even good, helping people to serve a purpose. It's easy to say it's wrong today, while ignoring our situation. In the future I am sure that people will look back to today and be shocked of what we thought was good and bad.
Well, everybody is a sex worker since we all work and struggle just to pass on our genes since times immemorial. So every time we move we are technically committing sex trafficking of ourselves.
Re: A common constitutional argument against sex offender registry laws is, was and always will be the 14th amendment
Posted: Tue Jun 09, 2026 7:51 am
by Artaxerxes II
Adge wrote: Sat May 23, 2026 12:26 am
Why don't pedophiles receive the same protections as other sexual minorities federally? If you kill someone who never hurt kids but was a pedophile, there are no hate crime enhancements they can add.
Disagree. If you’re going to appeal to legalisms, then pouring out how the SOR constitutes both double jeopardy + a cruel and unusual punishment, and at least in the USA double jeopardy is unconstitutional.