MAP Forum

https://xcancel.com/devilisblack666/sta ... 8013664720

Unintentionally funny video where a right-wing slop tuber wearing pit viper glasses asks three Swedish women if they would date a black guy after showing them a brochure of different interracial couples smiling, to which they answer by stating that they don't mind. And here's the kicker:

The slop tuber then tells them that having sex with a low IQ person is statutory rape per US law since low IQ people can't consent to sex and an IQ of 70 is needed to consent to sex, and then he says they would be statutory rapists under US laws if they had sex with a black man, and then he shows them an IQ chart. Video ends with the women going away, clearly confused at the questioning.

I think it's funny since liberals insist on vague and often inconsistent and vague notions of "informed consent" and "mental capacity" to justify why children having sex with adults is child rape. But the guy in the clip does make a good point inadvertently since society allows low-IQ men regardless of race (such as those with Down syndrome) to have sex whilst denying the same freedom to high-IQ minors. It does beg the question as to why "informed consent" really means and whether the presumed lack of this ability in minors is actually innate (as most liberal and leftist antis insist) or socially contingent on society insisting that it shouldn't be taught to minors or that it doesn't apply to adult-child sex at all.

Artaxerxes II wrote: Wed Jun 10, 2026 11:11 pm [...] But the guy in the clip does make a good point inadvertently since society allows low-IQ men regardless of race (such as those with Down syndrome) to have sex whilst denying the same freedom to high-IQ minors. [...]

Yeah, the 'normie' implication on consent seems to be that 'minor = low IQ.'
Of course IQ doesn't work that way.

I think the IQ issue is irrelevant and poorly framed; I don't think it's worth discussing.

But if, instead of IQ, he just talked about social issues, that could actually be really funny. After all, I’ve heard it said countless times that a minor cannot consent to sex with an adult because there is a “power imbalance”—that’s the prevailing argument. Well, let's look at a few statistics on the social situation of white and Black people... average income, likelihood of going to prison... that, without a doubt, is a massive power imbalance. So, yeah, according to the prevailing view, yes, interracial sex is rape. Now that would be a really funny way to troll certain people, and maybe that way at least some of them would start to realize just how ridiculous their nonsense about power imbalances really is.

aeterna91 wrote: Sat Jun 13, 2026 6:10 pm I think the IQ issue is irrelevant and poorly framed; I don't think it's worth discussing.

But if, instead of IQ, he just talked about social issues, that could actually be really funny. After all, I’ve heard it said countless times that a minor cannot consent to sex with an adult because there is a “power imbalance”—that’s the prevailing argument. Well, let's look at a few statistics on the social situation of white and Black people... average income, likelihood of going to prison... that, without a doubt, is a massive power imbalance. So, yeah, according to the prevailing view, yes, interracial sex is rape. Now that would be a really funny way to troll certain people, and maybe that way at least some of them would start to realize just how ridiculous their nonsense about power imbalances really is.

There's something not being talked about enough in our space. That is, progressives are already trying to ban interracial sex, especially White men with Black girls and women. Their claim is that structural racism creates a power difference that makes the sex inherently nonconsensual. There's also big efforts to ban White men having sex with Asian women because they're claiming that reinforces stereotypes of Asian women being submissive ("me love you long time" type tropes).

Look how big influencers have attacked passport bros. They're matter of factly calling it trafficking if a First World guy goes to the Philippines to meet a woman for intimate relationship, especially if he's significantly older than her.

Much of the rhetoric surrounding sex trafficking is claims that most sex buyers are White men and most commercial sex workers are Black women. The World Cup is being used to promote major campaigns against sex trafficking, most of which is activity that shouldn't be illegal.

White guys deserve to have intimate interactions with much younger dark women. The establishment must be attacked and removed from power so we can do that without interference.

galileo2333 wrote: Wed Jun 17, 2026 6:24 pm

aeterna91 wrote: Sat Jun 13, 2026 6:10 pm I think the IQ issue is irrelevant and poorly framed; I don't think it's worth discussing.

But if, instead of IQ, he just talked about social issues, that could actually be really funny. After all, I’ve heard it said countless times that a minor cannot consent to sex with an adult because there is a “power imbalance”—that’s the prevailing argument. Well, let's look at a few statistics on the social situation of white and Black people... average income, likelihood of going to prison... that, without a doubt, is a massive power imbalance. So, yeah, according to the prevailing view, yes, interracial sex is rape. Now that would be a really funny way to troll certain people, and maybe that way at least some of them would start to realize just how ridiculous their nonsense about power imbalances really is.

There's something not being talked about enough in our space. That is, progressives are already trying to ban interracial sex, especially White men with Black girls and women. Their claim is that structural racism creates a power difference that makes the sex inherently nonconsensual. There's also big efforts to ban White men having sex with Asian women because they're claiming that reinforces stereotypes of Asian women being submissive ("me love you long time" type tropes).

Look how big influencers have attacked passport bros. They're matter of factly calling it trafficking if a First World guy goes to the Philippines to meet a woman for intimate relationship, especially if he's significantly older than her.

Much of the rhetoric surrounding sex trafficking is claims that most sex buyers are White men and most commercial sex workers are Black women. The World Cup is being used to promote major campaigns against sex trafficking, most of which is activity that shouldn't be illegal.

White guys deserve to have intimate interactions with much younger dark women. The establishment must be attacked and removed from power so we can do that without interference.

You have a point! I hadn't considered the racist aspect of those arguments against “sex tourism".

However, I think the main point of these arguments is age-gap hysteria. What they really hate is older men having sex with young women. I still believe there’s a certain type of progressive, anti-racist person who would never advocate banning white people from having sex with black people, but who does advocate banning sex between people of different ages based on this absurd notion of a “power imbalance”—so they would experience severe cognitive dissonance when they realized that the logic of their argument would also require banning sex between white and black people.

aeterna91 wrote: Fri Jun 19, 2026 1:23 pm

galileo2333 wrote: Wed Jun 17, 2026 6:24 pm

aeterna91 wrote: Sat Jun 13, 2026 6:10 pm I think the IQ issue is irrelevant and poorly framed; I don't think it's worth discussing.

But if, instead of IQ, he just talked about social issues, that could actually be really funny. After all, I’ve heard it said countless times that a minor cannot consent to sex with an adult because there is a “power imbalance”—that’s the prevailing argument. Well, let's look at a few statistics on the social situation of white and Black people... average income, likelihood of going to prison... that, without a doubt, is a massive power imbalance. So, yeah, according to the prevailing view, yes, interracial sex is rape. Now that would be a really funny way to troll certain people, and maybe that way at least some of them would start to realize just how ridiculous their nonsense about power imbalances really is.

There's something not being talked about enough in our space. That is, progressives are already trying to ban interracial sex, especially White men with Black girls and women. Their claim is that structural racism creates a power difference that makes the sex inherently nonconsensual. There's also big efforts to ban White men having sex with Asian women because they're claiming that reinforces stereotypes of Asian women being submissive ("me love you long time" type tropes).

Look how big influencers have attacked passport bros. They're matter of factly calling it trafficking if a First World guy goes to the Philippines to meet a woman for intimate relationship, especially if he's significantly older than her.

Much of the rhetoric surrounding sex trafficking is claims that most sex buyers are White men and most commercial sex workers are Black women. The World Cup is being used to promote major campaigns against sex trafficking, most of which is activity that shouldn't be illegal.

White guys deserve to have intimate interactions with much younger dark women. The establishment must be attacked and removed from power so we can do that without interference.

You have a point! I hadn't considered the racist aspect of those arguments against “sex tourism".

However, I think the main point of these arguments is age-gap hysteria. What they really hate is older men having sex with young women. I still believe there’s a certain type of progressive, anti-racist person who would never advocate banning white people from having sex with black people, but who does advocate banning sex between people of different ages based on this absurd notion of a “power imbalance”—so they would experience severe cognitive dissonance when they realized that the logic of their argument would also require banning sex between white and black people.

Good points, but I think it’s less about racism and more about age gap hysteria, but even then that wouldn’t get close to the main focal point, which is classism. Let me elaborate:

Traditionally, the AoC was instituted so that aristocratic families could stop their daughters from getting pregnant with randos (especially lower classmen) as bastardy back then was a burden.

But the classism comes into play when you closely analyse the arguments against sex tourism which, once stripped of fake concerns over “exploitation”, the reasoning behind it is the same as the one feminists use against surrogacy: Men shouldn’t be able to have the “cheat code” to sex and biological fatherhood. From a Freudian standpoint, it can be said that the mainstream arguments against surrogacy and sex tourism are just masks to hide an attempt, ostensibly by women, to hide their esoteric reason which is to lock out sexual competition, especially for lower-classmen.

In fact, going back to MAA-AAM coupling, one of the antis’ points about “minors are too easy to manipulate” may be a Freudian slip on their part, in that much like sex tourism having sex with a minor amounts to allowing men of the working and lower classes to “cheat” by having sex in ways that would otherwise be impossible. Now, there are men who are gainer all three things, but all are either conservatives easily manipulated by appeals to their prudery, or liberal/leftist men trying hard to be validated by women by legislating their sexual anxieties into law.

That’s why these specific type of antis ignore the counterarguments against them on sex tourism, surrogacy, and adult-minor sex: It doesn’t come from logic so much as from a psycho-sexual anxiety, the same one that drives Neo-Nazis into being obsessed with racial cuckoldry.