MAP Forum

That the whole "femboy anime, femboy furry" thing is just an excuse to make characters that look REALLY fucking young or child coded without the whole "OMFG MINOR" label it'd get if it wasn't labeled "femboy" etc?

Sometimes I agree, but the main thing they find attractive is the femininity in males, which is usually unaccepted by society and/or different

Coyotehh wrote: Sat Jun 27, 2026 6:56 pm Sometimes I agree, but the main thing they find attractive is the femininity in males, which is usually unaccepted by society and/or different

Which is why we need to keep on doing it baby!

Definitely, though not everyone likes femininity in child-coded anime characters and the like. I do though, and I'm glad to have it, but the mental gymnastics of antis who like those characters is baffling and frustrating.

There’s literally a subgenre of furry art called “baby fur” which focuses on child-like furries

Scorchingwilde wrote: Sat Jun 27, 2026 7:31 pm Definitely, though not everyone likes femininity in child-coded anime characters and the like. I do though, and I'm glad to have it, but the mental gymnastics of antis who like those characters is baffling and frustrating.

LIKE i know right? A LOT of ocs are very much child coded yet people are perfectly fine having nsfw of it, swaybat (the artist) for instance . So much of her art is nsfw literal child coded characters yet you see her art literally all over discord and no ones calls it "bad" or "problematic" or anything because it does not have the title of "cub, loli or shota" etcetc.