Page 1 of 1

The Touch-Starved Adult

Posted: Wed Jul 29, 2026 10:42 pm
by Alice_Pleasance
For most of human history, children have been integrated into social and cultural life and the eroticism of child bodies was tolerated, taken for granted and did not even need to be mentioned because it was experienced by everyone in the community in daily life: humans routinely coddled, fondled, groomed children in the community and children reciprocated sexual exploration of the adults bodies. For single people today and in particular exclusive MAPs there is an epidemic of touch starvation. The media reports on touch starvation's negative affects on mental health and well-being, sometimes they report on this problem when it comes to children, but rarely when it comes to adults. Adult touch-starvation and the privation of inter-generational enjoyment from adults is not something that is even viewed as a problem for most of society, adults are supposed to have settled down with a partner and sexuality is falsely viewed as the normative genital penetrative sexuality which appears in mainstream porn. Adults who enjoy taking care of children are not allowed to touch them or be touched by them, when this is the obvious solution to the issue here as well as allowing children to sexually experiment with other children. Human sexuality is not entirely genital or penetrative in the way society's normative approach portrays sexuality in pornography, as always between consenting adults and selecting from a small catalog of acts. For humans, groping, smell, touch, bodily contact and other shared pleasures have always been just as important for human sexual activity, which always involved a social dimension of bonding and care which is older than the modern conception of consensual intercourse. It's an open secret that the link between a mother and a child's body during breastfeeding, care and nourishing behaviors in humans are erotic and sensual experiences for both parties, it is also an open secret that little girls regularly develop crushes for their older male teachers and their fathers but today is this rarely acknowledged, sometimes this is explored by both parties but modern society is ruled by fear. Uncles and avuncular figures throughout history have always had social contacts with boys which sometimes took on an erotic and sensual side. Older and younger guys who bond globally have passionate sexual contacts and female figures having contacts with younger girls and boys used to be practically tolerated. Despite all this, the media will talk about "the touch starvation epidemic" and not probe any further into the demographics of which people are actually being deprived of touch and sensuality with others, that is, children and older adults, and the logical solution of inter-generational relationships being decriminalized or allowed in some cases.

Re: The Touch-Starved Adult

Posted: Thu Jul 30, 2026 2:44 am
by bnkywuv
Alice_Pleasance wrote: Wed Jul 29, 2026 10:42 pm For most of human history, children have been integrated into social and cultural life and the eroticism of child bodies was tolerated, taken for granted and did not even need to be mentioned because it was experienced by everyone in the community in daily life: humans routinely coddled, fondled, groomed children in the community and children reciprocated sexual exploration of the adults bodies. For single people today and in particular exclusive MAPs there is an epidemic of touch starvation. The media reports on touch starvation's negative affects on mental health and well-being, sometimes they report on this problem when it comes to children, but rarely when it comes to adults. Adult touch-starvation and the privation of inter-generational enjoyment from adults is not something that is even viewed as a problem for most of society, adults are supposed to have settled down with a partner and sexuality is falsely viewed as the normative genital penetrative sexuality which appears in mainstream porn. Adults who enjoy taking care of children are not allowed to touch them or be touched by them, when this is the obvious solution to the issue here as well as allowing children to sexually experiment with other children. Human sexuality is not entirely genital or penetrative in the way society's normative approach portrays sexuality in pornography, as always between consenting adults and selecting from a small catalog of acts. For humans, groping, smell, touch, bodily contact and other shared pleasures have always been just as important for human sexual activity, which always involved a social dimension of bonding and care which is older than the modern conception of consensual intercourse. It's an open secret that the link between a mother and a child's body during breastfeeding, care and nourishing behaviors in humans are erotic and sensual experiences for both parties, it is also an open secret that little girls regularly develop crushes for their older male teachers and their fathers but today is this rarely acknowledged, sometimes this is explored by both parties but modern society is ruled by fear. Uncles and avuncular figures throughout history have always had social contacts with boys which sometimes took on an erotic and sensual side. Older and younger guys who bond globally have passionate sexual contacts and female figures having contacts with younger girls and boys used to be practically tolerated. Despite all this, the media will talk about "the touch starvation epidemic" and not probe any further into the demographics of which people are actually being deprived of touch and sensuality with others, that is, children and older adults, and the logical solution of inter-generational relationships being decriminalized or allowed in some cases.
Considering that some people are born with far less oxytocin receptors (typically narcissists and psychopaths with antagonistic personalities who ENJOY hurting others), it makes me think these are the people trying to push this "no touch" narrative. If they don't have many, if any oxytocin receptors then touch is actually an annoyance, if even disgust for them. They however know (too well) how touch deprivation affects people who need it, an unfortunate fact.

If my studies are correct touch deprivation is touted by these types of toxic people because it prevents bonding and makes children (and adults) dependent and desperate for attention, media swoops in and takes advantage of that, medical companies can prescribe medications for mood disorders when a simple loving touch could do the trick.

Then there's the law. Oh the legal system loves this kind of thing too! If someone doesn't have something the body needs they'll go to great lengths to get it. These people I think have found that to be a way of insisting punishment, illegal activities and money making through arrests and jailing by making people desperate to the point of breaking the law.

If these personality traits are in parents, they could be genetic (according to studies on brain scans and neurological research, there's a connection) which means if they are allowed to have kids, those genes will be passed on in some cases, and those without those genes will be forced into compliance. Thus I don't think this is purely a "society makes you scared of sex and touch" kind of thing, as studies indicate much of personality is genetic. We're not blank slates as babies and it can be observed at a very early age.

Like I keep saying, these people should NEVER EVER be allowed to be parents. This toxic dangerous narrative needs to be put to rest and we need to expose this evil behavior before all of Western people become sadistic child abusers and all the kind people become wiped out. I fear modern humanity is evolving into a more aggressive species, we don't have much reason to evolve physically due to our manipulating of our environment, so maybe we're evolving psychologically, genetically, and behaviorally instead?

I think the reason this anti-intergenerational thing is becoming a thing is because they don't want their kids getting freed of their brainwashing and to be confident, self loving individuals. Maybe I'm paranoid...actually I'm pretty sure I am at this point. This increase in harmful laws and ideas of society are driving me crazy...or maybe I AM just a crazy rebel who sees the reality for what it is.