Page 1 of 1
Ofcom investigates GB News for Gay-Paedo comparisons
Posted: Wed Aug 12, 2026 10:28 pm
by Jim Burton
https://www.attitude.co.uk/news/ofcom-t ... ia-531094/
https://www.theguardian.com/media/2026/ ... ine-farrow
Following Pride in London 2026, she described the event as a “very sexualised display”.
“I think the problem that Pride has is [that it’s] not about gay rights. It has become about celebrating every single sexuality that isn’t heterosexuality,” said Farrow.
“Including some very bizarre and unhealthy kinks and quirks, you know, like furries and bestiality, and even minor-attracted, they call themselves minor-attracted. You know, paedophiles.”
Re: Ofcom investigates GB News for Gay-Paedo comparisons
Posted: Wed Aug 12, 2026 11:08 pm
by Kierkegaard
I've always thought the reactionary discourse about how LGBT pride is a front for MAPs and has been run by MAPs the whole time is funny. Contrary to the ardent, ahistorical denialism by mainstream queers and leftists who say this is just a far right fabrication intended to demonize LGBT people, it is in fact true that many of the founders of the LGBT movement in the west and important figures in queer critical theory would be considered pedos by today's standards. Boy-love groups like PIE and Nambla marched alongside mainstream LGBT groups as recently as the early 90's in some places, and the list of important queer figures who were known for having critical views towards the age of consent and fucking 13 year olds is too long to list. Oscar Wilde, Foucault, De Beauvoir and Sartre, basically every French intellectual in existence, Alan Turing, Ginsberg, almost every other beat poet and a significant number of 60's/70's queer activists, etc.
It is a simple fact that having sex with pubescent teen boys was a very widespread, typical aspect of gay culture up until the 80's. Of course, the same is basically true for heterosexuals(look at all the rockstars who openly fucked 13 year old female groupies), so it's not like gay men are especially likely to be hebephiles. They weren't any less likely either though, and it's only semi-recently that the queer movement has strongly rejected MAP/pedo adjacent stuff.
That's the part that the homophobes get wrong. The queer movement used to be accepting of "MAPs" in practice, but things haven't really been that way since the 80's or so. And also pinning MAPness exclusively on queers when it's really always been a universal phenomenon practiced by heteros as well.