MAP Forum

A lot of maps like loli but do you think it's a good thing or should it be banned

I know there's a lot of overlap with LGBT and MAPs, do you think being minor attracted should be a sexuality within the broader LGBT+ community, do you think it's a seperate issue or somewhere in-between, do you maybe think minor attraction should be classed as part of neurodivergency. Just curious ...

I was growing up, but then as I got older it started to get obvious I had no real attraction to anyone my age or older.

My AOA is 12-16 with some slight play either way but I'd say that's the golden zone

You can enjoy being around adults more without being an aam, it depends whether you feel actual attraction or not. You really just have to look inside yourself and see where your feelings come from

[

Can someone educate me on why I should support pedos


[...] could you explain the reasons why prepubescents can consent and why you're correct. [...]


You have conflated 'supporting paedosexuals' with 'supporting pro-contact.' Those two positions are totally distinct from each other.

You ...

liliets wrote: Mon Feb 10, 2025 3:33 pm

jeffychubchaser29 wrote: Sun Feb 09, 2025 9:32 pm Wow over 200 views and no replies...bro fell off -_-

I think somethings are yet hard to answer for MAPs..

Erotic descriptions aren't encouraged and it's a bit hard to describe what turns you on without it being erotic

2) Supporting doesn't mean you need to be pro-c. "I think teens can consent, but pre-teens can't. However being attracted to preteens is just a feeling and feelings aren't illegal".

I'd say this has always been my stance, if we're going to keep the current status of pedophilia as part of the dsm ...

I'm a hebephile and have been for ages but I still see a big difference in pedos, I don't want to judge or anything but could you explain the reasons why prepubescents can consent and why you're correct. It's always been a barrier to me