I see they made the HIV analogy in their review.
I suggested some of their authors set their sights on the two Wikipedia articles that misrepresent "Pedophile Advocacy" groups and provide outdated information. This could be done by writing a citable journal article on present-day MAP initiatives.
A Review of Academic Use of the Term “Minor Attracted Persons”
-
Jim Burton
- Posts: 772
- Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2024 10:33 pm
Re: A Review of Academic Use of the Term “Minor Attracted Persons”
Committee Member: Mu. Editorial Lead: Yesmap
Re: A Review of Academic Use of the Term “Minor Attracted Persons”
Salter's piece itself, in referencing some "MAP activist groups" could help with those articles, yes?
I'm not saying that all scoutmasters are pedophiles. I might be saying that the best ones are.
Louis C.K: Sorry
Interviews:
1: https://fstube.net/w/4bmc3B97iHsUA8rgyUv21S
3: https://fstube.net/w/xd1o7ctj2s51v97EVZhwHs
Louis C.K: Sorry
Interviews:
1: https://fstube.net/w/4bmc3B97iHsUA8rgyUv21S
3: https://fstube.net/w/xd1o7ctj2s51v97EVZhwHs
-
Jim Burton
- Posts: 772
- Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2024 10:33 pm
Re: A Review of Academic Use of the Term “Minor Attracted Persons”
There is now a reply from the Harper group, and a reply to the reply.
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.117 ... 0251332197
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.117 ... 0251332198
Salter just puts out an enormous invitation to list and immortalise the "groups" by repeating my concept of a "MAP Movement". I thought he was against adopting language on the basis of where it came from?
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.117 ... 0251332197
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.117 ... 0251332198
Salter just puts out an enormous invitation to list and immortalise the "groups" by repeating my concept of a "MAP Movement". I thought he was against adopting language on the basis of where it came from?
Committee Member: Mu. Editorial Lead: Yesmap