MAP Forum

Theendoftheline wrote: Wed Aug 12, 2026 6:04 pm Oh theirs a HUGE percent of teens that are antis I'd even go as far as to say most of them. Hang out on social media apps enough and you'll see plenty of teens saying how for example a 16 year old dating an 18 year old is the worst thing possible and how the 18 yo is a groomer.

I've seen evidence of this in heated X threads. This is definitely the byproduct of anti pedo hysteria and would have never happened in the 90s and 2000s. They'll post a Google docs showing 16-19 dating and all in synonymous dead ass agreement it is wrong and evil. Including people younger. Shouldn't they not be able to understand that according to their own logic?

>groomer
They can't define that term in anyway that separates it from 18+ courtship. Groomer simply means normal human courtship with someone above and below 18. The term groomer attributed to the older person. Precise logic to separate 17-19 and 17-29 dating don't exist. They just label a 29 year old an experienced predator.

aeterna91 wrote: Wed Aug 12, 2026 4:42 pm I've even read posts from minors arguing for an age of consent higher than their own, or even from people aged 18–20 arguing that the age of consent should be raised above their own age. It’s crazy, because they base their arguments on fallacies like the one about the prefrontal cortex,

You mentioned minors and normies in general arguing using the prefrontal cortex as an excuse. Using the same logic of the prefrontal cortex we can infer that the mass number special needs adults who possessed CSAM/decoy chat solicitation crimes can't be held accountable because they have prefrontal cortex's that are significantly impaired. (Autistic PF's have very close knit wiring that causes abnormal repetitive behaviors and they don't pick up on social norms dampening their ability to follow social rules and in engage in risky behavior, low impulse control and explosive tantrums and isolating from society with no friends until the courts drag them out of their bedroom for a CSAM arrest )

While the question of teenagers and sex is meet with neuroscience on the prefrontal cortex, autistic CSAM defendants get pressed with the right/wrong test McNaghten rules alone, where everything is over simplified into a binary of good or bad.

If we really want to be equal in logic it will be

1:Simple logic of, Old enough to bleed old enough to bleed for sex | right vs wrong for sex crimes
or
2: We can apply frontal cortex science across the board to its logical conclusions

I'm picking 2:

When science shows that the prefrontal cortex is actually designated to imitate behaviors observed in the first 25 years of life and that each individual's prefrontal cortex adapts to any given society, studying and mimicking both the good and the bad the feminist world view on a high AoC will be shaken and challenged. In reality prefrontal cortex molding is best explained as

first 25 years in a ghetto with high crime = mold to those behaviors
first 25 years with special needs sheltered in their bedroom = mold to those behaviors
first 25 years in a patriarchal religious authoritarian society = mold to those behaviors
first 25 years in a good healthy environment that teaches impulse control and discipline = mold to those behaviors

That is what will put feminist and their prefrontal cortex talk in the hot chair. Intellectually honest feminist will admit that is the case but the dumb ones will get weeded out. Maybe I'm mistaken for assuming logical can refute cultural hysteria. My point is we don't need a developed prefrontal cortex to enjoy and have safe sexual pleasure and nor is their evidence of sex with teens inherently being harmful.

But there is evidence that

1) dragging teen girls through courts causes harm (a state attorney admitted this that she didn't want to bring the victim to court due to trauma)
2) telling a teen girl her ex lover is evil will retroactively make her hate him and flood her brain with disgust and betrayal
3) retroactive victimhood being so common even though we live in a hyper #metoo culture

Keep telling antis that the prefrontal cortex's real job is to adapt to the first 25 years of life. Make sure they quit spreading incomplete or misinformation about it being the AoC part of the brain.

--
One other thing - On X there was a random comment saying it was pedophilic for a 16 year old male to sexually fantasize about adult women. This comment is massively ignorant and stupid because 16 year old males brain's reward pathways will cement to finding teens attractive to life potentially. I mean that is good for us but for normie society if 14-16 year old dudes were to take that advice they'd only fap to fantasies of teenagers and by the time they are 18 they realize the fantasy persist and a 14 year old who took that advice is still attracted to 14 year olds at 18 all because he was haunted by the concept of fapping to 18+ adults.

Other thing that is common on teen profiles on Mastodon and X is "DNI under 15" when they are 17. It shows how strong social norms are in place haunting them. The strong social norms and moral codes are depriving them of precious liberty to love and be loved. And as Max Stiner said these social social norms are nothing but metaphorical phantoms inside their own mind. I add they dissolve when put under the lenses of critical thinking. But as long as social status seeking and peer pressure exist unchallenged they are here to stay.

Jim Burton wrote: Wed Aug 12, 2026 10:03 pm Random minors' opinions about how it applies to them would apparently not matter, since they are deemed incompetent under the law. The function and original purpose of this particular law is protection of the incompetent, not responding to their "concerns" or "preferences".

Obviously they do understand whats going on but I was to mock argue that "How can anti teens appreciate predator busters on Youtube like Chris Hansen, Jidion, Alex Rosen and "dead pedophiles don't re-offend shirts" if they are too incompetent to understand sex they are too incompetent to understand predator buster YT drama.

They could argue back we understand sex we just disagree with age gaps and creepy demonic adults like zarkle trying to abuse us and get 1000 likes.

Kierkegaard wrote: Wed Aug 12, 2026 11:17 pm I think it's sad, but also a predictable consequence of MAP affirming narratives and subcultures being non-existent on the mainstream internet due to overwhelming censorship. They simply don't have exposure to any positive portrayals of MAPs in media or in the online discourse they're submerged in, so they never even have the opportunity to consider that positions other than 'MAPs = evil predators' are allowed.

Yup, this is part of it.

MAPallmylife66 wrote: Thu Aug 13, 2026 2:28 am

weird.organisms wrote: Wed Aug 12, 2026 11:32 am What do you think of antis who are also minors?
In all honesty I'm terrified of them knowing what they'll likely grow up to be...but that doesn't mean I don't find them cute!

I believe this is a learned perception of MAP's from outside influences, and also from bad experiences with predators. In either case, their perceptions of MAP's is not their fault. It's the fault of those who influence their perceptions and beliefs.

Yeah....like anything or like men asking women, their are plenty of people on various social media that will straight up act like pigs around minors asking straight up for nudes etc and not even trying to be subtle about it.