STICKY: Someone is normalizing MAPs on the internet(!!!)

[Meiwaku_Mailing_Girl]

Ngo just covered the B4U-ACT conference.

https://x.com/MrAndyNgo/status/1918475651633307942

That's interesting! I'm attending the conference.

[Jim Burton]

https://www.city-journal.org/article/b4 ... ap-therapy

[RoosterDance]

Ngo just covered the B4U-ACT conference.

https://x.com/MrAndyNgo/status/1918475651633307942

I can't see the replies because I don't want to sign up for twitter.
What's the general reaction like? The usual, I assume?

[Jim Burton]

Well, moronic.

https://x.com/LibTearCreator1/status/19 ... 4967266792

[Jim Burton]

This Townhall piece is utterly insane. He whips himself up into a frenzy and appears to channel what I can only describe as a feature-length end-times paroxysm with demons, gargoyles and a classic Karpman drama triangle. Is he still alive, can someone check?

https://townhall.com/columnists/kevinmc ... n-n2656559

It was only a matter of time.

After years of gender confusion being pumped into public schools, drag queens reading to toddlers in libraries, hormone blockers being given to children behind their parents’ backs, and activist teachers deliberately undermining family values—we’ve arrived at the next predictable, sickening stop on the cultural depravity express: the normalization of pedophilia.

(...)

So let me say what the media won’t: A society that even hesitates to draw a moral line against pedophilia is a society unworthy of survival.

And a political ideology that keeps finding new ways to excuse, repackage, or soften the language around child sexual abuse doesn’t just hate morals, traditions, or Christianity.

It hates children.

It hates the clarity children bring. It hates their joy. It hates their vulnerability. And worst of all, it hates the idea that parents—not bureaucrats, not social engineers, not “MAP”-friendly therapists—should be the ones to raise them.

The radical Left has lost the argument on merit, on science, and on decency. All it has left is narrative manipulation and institutional capture. Which is why groups like B4U-ACT exist in the first place—to soften the ground, prep the language, and sell the lie.

[Aspire6]

This Townhall piece is utterly insane. He whips himself up into a frenzy and appears to channel what I can only describe as a feature-length end-times paroxysm with demons, gargoyles and a classic Karpman drama triangle. Is he still alive, can someone check?

https://townhall.com/columnists/kevinmc ... n-n2656559

HA! That's batshit insane. I have no words. I wanted to leave a critical comment there but you have to pay to do so. Bastards.

I hope B4U-ACT is doing alright, I'm sure they're getting flooded by completely unnecessary hate right now because of the hysteria finding them. Removed: Shame on Townhall for their article, absolutely terrible journalism by them.

Edit 1: I have amended the above slightly and written what I likely would have wrote there, rather below instead. The following is my own opinion and I do not represent the views of Mu.

Townhall, shame on you for your journalism. You claim you wish to "protect the children", sure, we do too. To claim the "left" hates children misses the entire point of this movement because the left hates us too. We have no "side", we've always been on our own. You just haven't figured that out yet, ironic for someone who claims to be "journalists". B4U-ACT isn't "woke", it's not "affirming", it's called supporting. Supporting people who society should be more willing to talk about. Your fear of us is completely irrational.

It's back to that idea of protecting the children, and fun fact for you "journalists", a majority of sexual offenses against children are done by people who don't even have a preferential attraction to them; they are just situational offenders taking advantage of an easy target and an opportunity. It is horrible, we think it's horrible too. See? We're not that different after all, surprise! B4U-ACT has research on this, I recommend you actually visit their website instead of hurling false hysteria towards a group doing more than you ever could to actually protect the children.

Back to MAPs though, who you're so keen on calling "pedophiles", sure some of us can be called that, but some of us aren't. The term pedophile is someone who is attracted to pre-pubescent children. Someone who is attracted to say 13 and up is very much not a pedophile. I'm a pedophile and I don't mind calling myself that, we're not afraid of the term.

If you truly wished to "protect" the children, you would recognize the need to ensure that MAPs feel safe coming forward for help. The LAST thing, you ever want to do, is the opposite of that. If you hound any group of people, isolate them, push them to the brink, and leave them nothing to lose, they will become a serious danger to society. This is why pushing your irrational fear is horrible. It continues that narrative that we're all evil monsters hiding in the alleyway. These people, MAPs, who already deal with intense stigma of having the attractions, should feel safe seeking help to ensure they stay non-offending and live fulfilling lives.

If you don't agree with that, or suggest "castration" or "locking them up" or "killing them", I have a hard time believing you actually wish to "protect the children". You're just afraid of the discussion and that's childish. Do better.

[PorcelainLark]

This Townhall piece is utterly insane. He whips himself up into a frenzy and appears to channel what I can only describe as a feature-length end-times paroxysm with demons, gargoyles and a classic Karpman drama triangle. Is he still alive, can someone check?

https://townhall.com/columnists/kevinmc ... n-n2656559

It was only a matter of time.

After years of gender confusion being pumped into public schools, drag queens reading to toddlers in libraries, hormone blockers being given to children behind their parents’ backs, and activist teachers deliberately undermining family values—we’ve arrived at the next predictable, sickening stop on the cultural depravity express: the normalization of pedophilia..

Acting like B4U-ACT wasn't founded OVER TWO DECADES AGO. This preceded any of this culture war conflict about trans people, come on.

The latest revolting example comes via a City Journal exposé on “B4U-ACT,” a Maryland-based organization that openly campaigns to destigmatize pedophilic attraction.

"Exposé," "openly."

Let’s be crystal clear: there is no “identity” in being sexually attracted to children. There is no “community” of “MAPs” that deserves inclusion in therapeutic development. There is no “orientation” in preying on the most vulnerable. It is not something to be “affirmed.”

How's that worked out for society? Who has sweeping all this stuff under the rug helped?

It is a pathology to be fought and condemned.

Source? What's the evidence it's a pathology you can "fight?" Why not just say pedophiles are dangerous and you want to get rid of them? Why use this medical-sounding language?

The reason they always go after the kids is simple: children represent innocence, and innocence is the last remaining obstacle to total cultural collapse. The radicals know they can’t win unless they corrupt that innocence.

Some of the pinnacles of European culture were Rome and Ancient Greece. Is pederasty a characteristic of a feminized culture, or a virile one? Is sentimentalism the sign of a powerful culture, or one declining into weakness? Now, I'm a bleeding heart liberal, I think sensitivity is a good thing, but how does preserving innocence help the next generation grow up into the kinds of brutes you want them to be?

It’s not enough to blur the lines between boy and girl, parent and child, teacher and activist. Now they’re trying to blur the line between criminal perversion and “misunderstood identity.”

Yes, because we all know B4U-ACT is for rapists and zoophiles.

So let me say what the media won’t: A society that even hesitates to draw a moral line against pedophilia is a society unworthy of survival.

How brave of you. You ARE the media.

We will never affirm pedophilia. We will never respect it. We will never legalize, normalize, or tolerate it under any banner—no matter how colorful the flag or how academic the justification.

So you're going to oppose Christianity now? No, you're going to pretend Christianity doesn't have a problem with sexual predation, because you don't actually care about stopping it. You care about posturing as a tough guy, because outwardly saying you oppose B4U-ACT makes you look better even if it means you end up sweeping abuse under the rug. You are a moral coward. If you had the balls to actually help children, you would be on B4U-ACT's side, but you're too chickenshit to do anything that would make you look bad.

[Bgbl613]

Los pedofilos al igual que Los y las homosexual es siempre han existido y seguiran existiendo, pretender lo contrario es querer tapar El sol con UN dedo. Existen muchos menores que buscan UN hombre que Los quiera, Los cuide, Los ame.

[Jim Burton]

https://x.com/TheEmmapreneur/status/1920588999283912874

Pedophiles have long been weaponizing compassion in order to normalize the stigma around the fact that they are predators. By changing the terminology from ‘pedophile’ to ‘minor attracted person’ or ‘MAP’, they hope you will welcome them with open arms, feel sorry for them, and allow laws to be passed to LEGALIZE their violence and CRIMES against children.

This slow normalization is called the ‘Overton Window’ where a subject matter is presented in doses to desensitize the public through small ‘shocks’ until society ‘gets used’ to the idea of accepting something they normally wouldn’t accept. It’s a slow crawl into hell. And pedophiles want you to run in.

Please educate yourself on this serious subject matter. We may think there’s no way that the age of consent could lower here in America, but these predators are well on their way to sneaking in legislation that will allow them to legally prey on our most vulnerable and innocent demographic: children. Why? Because you aren’t paying attention.

They are NOT ‘MAPS’. They are criminals, predators, sexual deviants, and psychopaths.

Period.

Pretty sure that isn't an Overton Window.

"I won't call them MAPs!" [immediately issues a series of motivations for using the word "MAP"]

[Aspire6]

"Weaponizing compassion", yeah that we're still human beings. Sorry to break the news to you.

Why do they keep using the same interview too? I hate how it's edited, it misses all the points the full interview hits. Guess that's the intention, fear through obfuscation.

Shame on TheEmmapreneur, you're a disappointing "journalist". Do better.

If you want the full interview, see the 24 minute and 20 second video here: https://youtu.be/GOb493ued-g
I recommend you actually watch the full video, this man is absolutely not a threat.