eveeve wrote: Wed Apr 09, 2025 8:22 pm
I’d be happy to answer any questions! I don’t mind awkward questions at all. (also sorry if my answers seem all of the place, like i said this is still very new to me to be this open about my attraction)
I'm glad, still, because I sometimes do surveys, I like to make sure the people I'm talking to are comfortable as a matter of course. If you're happy, I'm happy!
For me personally i’m more of a pedophile compared to a hepephile, usually when I see an attractive child i tend to more attracted towards childlike features. Don’t get me wrong at all there have been plenty of early teens i have found extremely attractive but most of them have childlike features they have retained from early stages. So yeah to answer your first question yes early adolescent children are way more appealing to me because of their physically traits, I do have said in the past the more childlike features the better for my attraction.
This gave me an idea. Maybe, proportionally speaking, female MAPs tend to be more pedophilic/nepiophilic than male MAPs, and likewise less hebephilic than male MAPs?
For my thoughts on Nepiophilia, there have been times where i’ve thought to myself a young child around that age was attractive and even got some sort of arousal from it but personally i prefer the child to have a little more facial features and figure to them. And this isn’t a jab at nepiophiles at all it’s just not my cup of tea but I can see the appeal of it!
I've wondered about this before, if MAPs are attracted to neoteny why wouldn't there be more nepiophiles?
For the next question on femininity and masculinity, for girls I tend to lean more to the side of childlike, petite and slim (apologies for sounding pervy) appearances.
No worries about sounding pervy. As long as you aren't being too explicit, I don't think you're breaking any rules.
Basically I like when girls have more childlike features with a little bit of figure to them, that’s the best way I can put it. For me
personally I think the age of 7-9 is the perfect age for girls, even my AoA for girls is 5-14, they still have a childlike face, slim childlike body(again sorry for sounding pervy), short, but they start to get a nice early teen body which I really like in girls.
My ideal age of attraction is exactly 7-9 too! It's difficult to define why that particular shape is appealing. A while ago I was trying to work out how you could define that appearance without reference to the stages of development before and after that point. It's puzzling...
For boys, it is a little different, i do prefer boys around ages 7 and up and i do like when they start getting a little muscle mass but still have those childlike qualities about them in their appearance. I still like when they aren’t that tall and shoulders aren’t that broad as normal teenagers are. I do tend to find older looker minors less attractive mostly because like I said I do find childlike qualities very attractive. And for the last part I do find that I am more attracted to girls than boys, I’ve been bi since as long as I can remember and even when I was younger I always found myself more attracted to girls than boys. Even though I do like both still!
This is interesting stuff, thank you for sharing. I'd really like to find out if this is common across most women who are MAPs.
For the last 2 questions, I don’t think my fantasies are that related to breastfeeding, but I will say without going too much into detail, breastfeeding is a very intimate thing between mother and child, and that most def has an impact on female pedophilia. I wouldn’t be surprised if most female pedophilia comes from that, for me that wasn’t the case because I did feel the attraction towards children in my late teens.
There was this really interesting article on Newgon about parenthood and pedophilia that contributed to my speculation about this.
https://wiki.yesmap.net/wiki/Debate_Gui ... pedophilia
Of course, it's not a foregone conclusion, but it's interesting to think about.
I absolutely think my sex drive is higher than most woman, (without sounding like too much of a perv again and hopefully I’m able to say this), I do tend to find myself masturbating a few times daily, which is was more than other woman my age. I still think I have the same if not a little higher of a sex drive than when i was a teenager. When I was around 12/13 I would religiously be in my room exploring my teenage parts lol. Most of my friends my age I have don’t seem to relate to my high sex drive. So that def could be a factor for it as well.
Maybe this accounts for the rarity of female MAPs: it requires some homosexual tendencies (which tends to be the minority of the total population) along with an abnormally high libido. Having said that, I did know someone who was an AFAB asexual MAP, so it's much too soon to draw conclusions.
I don’t mind perverted or awkward sounding questions at all! It actually feels very nice to get these things off my chest and be open for once. If you have any more i’d be more than happy to answer them all! Let me know if I missed anything or misinterpret a question!
I'm glad, I'll make a mental note. Female MAPs are an understudied population, and I expect it's little uncomfortable or irritating for some people to be asked a lot of questions. It's a good opportunity, though. I don't think you missed or misinterpreted anything. Thanks for the help!
WavesInEternity wrote: Thu Apr 10, 2025 2:38 am
Your theories are really interesting, especially the first two but also the third. If you can find proper academic references, I think you should write a guest blog about them. I could co-author it if it helps.
Thanks! I'll see, I'm kind of more at home with spitballing ideas than creating finished products. Not to say it'll never happen, just that the combination of having a clear sense of how you want things to be with a low capacity to stay organized, means it's a bit tricky.
The predictions of your theories seem spot-on regarding eveeve. On the male side, well, I've often been called androgynous, and my preferences also match a lot of what eveeve says, although I'm exclusively heterosexual.
I had this idea you might be able to pick up subliminally on whether a person is a MAP (kind of like gaydar), at least when it comes to men based on if they are feminine but not gay or trans. This is getting into conspiracy territory but, for example, consider Roman Polanski (let's assume for a moment that he was a MAP and not an opportunistic offender); there's something distinctly feminine about him, to my perspective.
As for the third aspect of your theory, I don't think it's correct to say that females normally have a "lower" sex drive, but it's definitely different. The typical male sex drive is more about "wanting/taking", while for females it's more about "being wanted/taken". For males, it's more visual and explicit ("god she's so cute! I love x and y about her body"); for females, it's more relational and implicit ("hm, I think there's a lot that's attractive about that guy friend"). I've experienced both types, and can attest to them being very different processes that nonetheless both produce the same result—sexual arousal—in the end.
To be honest, the third is the one I'm least committed to. It's the most recent and least fleshed out.