In my last post on 14th sept 2025 under the caption “The Human Past History Could Exonerate the Present Generation of Pedophiles With Vengeance”, I announced that I will be presenting the sequel or the extension of my first paper (Which I consider as “original” posted during the month of May 2025) and said the time line would be a couple of months perhaps longer or shorter.
At present I have almost completed the rough draft of this sequel, under the title: “POSTPONEMENT: PEDOPHILIA OFFENCE, CSA LAWS: BIGGEST SCAM BY MODERN POLITICAL MEDICAL AND LEGAL HISTORY"
However, at this time I have some important project task to finish. I am trying to complete two important manuscript the first one named “AGI Promise UBI” and the second one is “Zero Work Theory: The Theoretical Foundation of UBI and I need at this time all my time energy and concentration to make it happen.
Therefore, I am sorry to tell, it will take another stretch three four months, perhaps up to the first quarters of 2026, sorry for the long postponement, I hope this time I will be successful in delivering within this time period. Thank you.
By the way, I would like to present the Introductory piece of the paper here below
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Prelude and Context:
This paper is a sequel to my earlier work titled; PEDOPHILIA CRIMINAL OFFENCE OR CSA LAWS BUILT ON MORALLY BANKRUPT WESTERN PSEDOSCEINCES. I refer to it as the “original paper,” first published on my “anticorruptionfight.blogpost.com” blog and later in the “Minor Attracted Person” (MAP) forum in early 2025. The principal objective of the original paper was to demonstrate, through facts and evidence, that the prevailing “Child Sexual Abuse” (CSA) laws, promulgated by the emerging Western political modern ideological systems, and replicated by medical research bodies, conscripted to support its politically prescribed positions and enforced by their legal establishments are fundamentally fraudulent. Their very formulations qualify them as “pseudoscience.”
These laws criminalizing adult-minor sexual relations are built upon a foundation of Victorian-era puritan moral codes, known as “Age of Consent” (AoC) legislation. This legislation itself was constructed on Judeo-Christian, gynocentric, patriarchal values/virtues and prejudices, amplified by moral panic, with media frinzy, promoted by the ruling political establishment since the late 19th century. This framework was later transformed into modern CSA criminal statutes, propagated by Western ruling powers and adopted by their medical and legal establishments in the latter half of the 20th century.
Present Paper- Sections
PEDOPHILIA OFFENCE, CSA LAWS: BIGGEST SCAM BY MODERN POLITICAL MEDICAL AND LEGAL HISTORY is based on the same “first principle” theoretical perspective used in the original paper. As a sequel, it seeks to address numerous crucial questions central to the subject, filling gaps in the previous work, particularly concerning the concept of “pseudoscience,” which required expanded clarification. This introductory section presents the essential subject matter of the paper, section by section.
SECTION I begins with this “Prelude and Contex” introduction then into its most fundamental philosophical and scientific question in human history: WHAT IS LIFE? I place this question at the beginning because it forms the foundational basis for understanding the origins of human sexuality—especially in relation to adolescent–adult sexual relations, which are currently stigmatized or labelled as “pedophile behaviour” in contemporary our society.
SECTION II offers an extensive historical perspective, exploring AVAILABLE HUMAN HISTORICAL RECORD EVIDENCES that demonstrate compellingly that “adult–adolescent sexual relations,” widely practiced across cultures and traditions for hundreds and thousands of years, did not produce any “inherent or irreversible harms and damages” to adolescents—either at the time or in their future lives. On the contrary, the long human historical record shows that adolescent–adult sexual relations were essential for the survival of the human species (given low life expectancy) and contributed to social, moral, and communal well-being. These practices, often sanctioned as marriages, stand as the strongest testimonial against the modern Western claims that adolescent sexual involvement with adults is inherently harmful. Such claims, enthusiastically echoed by political, medical, and legal establishments and further amplified by mainstream media under the label of “pedophilia” are in fact built upon modern Western pseudoscience’s.
SECTION-III explains in detail what I mean by “Pseudoscience,” a central term in the title and argument of this paper. I distinguish it clearly from real science. This section begins by repudiating the Western medical and legal establishments’ basic doctrine that “any adult–adolescent sexual relations are inherently harmful, causing irreversible damage to the child.” My fundamental argument is that this doctrine completely lacks falsifiability, the most essential criterion for scientific or critical inquiry. It offers no rigorous scientific scrutiny, no experimental evidence, and no demonstrable proof to validate its claims. Instead, it relies on anecdotal stories, emotive narratives, logical fallacies, and distorted, cherry-picked data crafted to support predetermined conclusions or ideological dogmas. This will be discussed in full in the final section of the paper.
HELP FOR PEOPLE FIGHTING COURT CASES AGAINST CSA LAWS
One major objective of this paper and the original is to support individuals accused of being “pedophiles” and prosecuted under CSA laws, as well as the lawyers defending them. I strongly believe that the comprehensive facts and evidence presented here will materially assist them in contesting and winning such cases. Additional details can be found in my paper published in the MAP Forum (https://forum.map-union.org/), titled: “UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF U.S. LEGAL SYSTEM: A CHALLENGE TO CSA LAWS ON THE GROUNDS OF UNSCIENTIFIC, BIASED, DISCRIMINATORY, IDEOLOGICALLY CORRUPT, AND POLITICALLY MOTIVATED.” See the section entitled “Theorycrafting.”