MAP Forum

Officerkrupke wrote: Wed Nov 05, 2025 12:46 pm
against the current pedo panic and stigmatization of MAPs.

MAPs includes pedos, so clearly no.

I don't see any sound reason to stop, as MAPs and the like are used as a cover for hostility to pedophilia.

Black men is a true subset of men. Sane people knows this.

I was quoting Rind's analysis of a Finnish student sampe, which clearly shows coercion and willingness (as in initition( on the part of the girl matters, in sharp contrast to your own dogmatic claim of harm.

Dworkin? You've never heard of e.g. Stanton, Butler, Sanger, Pankhurst, Hirschfeld, who'd not even afford us the tolerance demonized as conservative (e.g. AoC 7, marriage)? Rather than talking of "friendly" feminism, which is merely hypothetical as evidenced by the lack of said tolerance, we should ...

With regard to positive reactions in girls, the odds ratio is 4.50, favoring non-coerced and 3.42 as the initiator, so I put my trust in girls and math, not feminist extremism and their anti-girl anti-GL anti-family agenda.


Welcome, despite the extremist bias.

Useless section, given the extreme hostility to free speech here.

Yes, because sex is discouraged from occurring outside of marriage. You can say that's a good thing, but that's saying sexual repression is a good thing.



I contend that a lower AoC (e.g. 7) is preferable to that typically sought by feminists/progressives/liberals (ie: 18+) at the time. The ...

There isn't a snowball's chance in Hell that will work.





Proof? And no, some claim like:





The right has historically been, and continues to be repressive towards sexuality.






need not be accepted at face value.



An AoC of maybe 7, or being able to marry one's young sweetheart ...